A Query Approach to Modeling Attendance to Attributes in Discrete Choice Experiments

被引：0
|
作者：
Kemper, Nathan [1 ]
Popp, Jennie [1 ,2 ]
Nayga, Rodolfo M. [3 ,4 ]
Bazzani, Claudia [5 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Honors Coll, Fayetteville, AR USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Econ, College Stn, TX USA
[4] Korea Univ, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Univ Verona, Dept Business Adm, Verona, Italy
来源：
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS | 2024年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词：
attribute nonattendance; discrete choice experiments; genetically modified organisms; query theory; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; EYE TRACKING; PREFERENCES; IMPACT;
D O I：
10.22004/ag.econ.338993
中图分类号：
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号：
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要：
Overlooking respondents' attribute attendance in choice experiments affects coefficient estimates, model fit, performance measures, and welfare estimates. How best to identify and account for individual attribute processing strategies is still unclear. Query theory suggests that preferences are subject to the processes and dynamics associated with retrieval from memory. We apply Query theory to the study of attendance to attributes to approximate the thoughts generated by individuals while they make choices in a choice experiment. Our results demonstrate that the stated and query approaches improve model fit and performance. The query approach has distinct advantages but also important limitations.
引用
收藏
页码：392 / 409
页数：22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Varying choice set sizes in discrete choice experiments
    Akinc, Deniz
    Street, Deborah J.
    Vandebroek, Martina
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2024, 52
  • [42] Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Rigby, Dan
    Burton, Michael
    Pluske, Jo
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 65 (02): : 441 - 461
  • [43] Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Richard Norman
    Benjamin M. Craig
    Paul Hansen
    Marcel F. Jonker
    John Rose
    Deborah J. Street
    Brendan Mulhern
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12 : 281 - 285
  • [44] Optimal design for discrete choice experiments
    Grasshoff, Ulrike
    Grossmann, Heiko
    Holling, Heinz
    Schwabe, Rainer
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2013, 143 (01) : 167 - 175
  • [45] Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    Flynn, Terry N.
    Carson, Richard T.
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2010, 3 (03) : 57 - 72
  • [46] RISK COMMUNICATION FOR DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
    Weissler, E.
    Wallace, M. J.
    Yang, J. C.
    Brotzman, L. E.
    Corriere, M. A.
    Ea, Secemsky
    Sutphin, J.
    Johnson, R.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Me, Tarver
    Saha, A.
    Gebben, D.
    Chen, A. L.
    Malone, M.
    Farb, A.
    Zikmund-Fisher, B. J.
    Reed, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S556 - S556
  • [47] Latent variables in discrete choice experiments
    Rungie, Cam M.
    Coote, Leonard V.
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2012, 5 (3.) : 145 - 156
  • [48] Strategic bias in discrete choice experiments
    Meginnis, Keila
    Burton, Michael
    Chan, Ron
    Rigby, Dan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 109
  • [49] Effects coding in discrete choice experiments
    Bech, M
    Gyrd-Hansen, D
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (10) : 1079 - 1083
  • [50] Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Norman, Richard
    Craig, Benjamin M.
    Hansen, Paul
    Jonker, Marcel F.
    Rose, John
    Street, Deborah J.
    Mulhern, Brendan
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (03): : 281 - 285
12345