AI-Assisted Treatment Planning for Dental Implant Placement: Clinical vs AI-Generated Plans

被引:3
|
作者
Satapathy, Sukanta K. [1 ]
Kunam, Aishwarya [2 ]
Rashme, Rashme [3 ]
Sudarsanam, Pooja Priyadarshini [3 ]
Gupta, Anuj [4 ]
Kumar, H. S. Kiran [5 ]
机构
[1] Fakirmohan Med Coll, Dept Dent, Balasore, Odisha, India
[2] Indiana Univ, Hlth Informat, Bloomington, IN USA
[3] Rajarajeshwari Dent Coll & Hosp, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[4] Sudha Rustagi Coll Dent Sci & Res, Dept Prosthodont Crown & Bridge, Faridabad, India
[5] Sri Hasanamba Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont & Implantol, Hassan, Karnataka, India
关键词
Accuracy; AI-assisted planning; clinical expertise; dental implant placement; dentistry; efficiency; surgical templates; treatment planning;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1121_23
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant placement is a critical procedure in modern dentistry, requiring precise treatment planning to ensure successful outcomes. Traditionally, treatment planning has relied on the expertise of clinicians, but recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have opened up the possibility of AI-assisted treatment planning. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients requiring dental implant placement were included in this comparative study. For each patient, a clinical treatment plan was created by an experienced dentist, while an AI algorithm, trained on a dataset of implant placement cases, generated an alternative plan. Various parameters, including implant position, angulation, and depth, were compared between the two plans. Surgical templates were fabricated based on both plans to guide implant placement accurately. Results: The results of this study indicate that AI-generated treatment plans closely align with clinical plans in terms of implant positioning, angulation, and depth. Mean discrepancies of less than 1 mm and 2 degrees were observed for implant position and angulation, respectively, between the two planning methods. The AI-generated plans also showed a reduction in planning time, averaging 10 min compared to the clinical planning, which averaged 30 min per case. Additionally, the surgical templates based on AI-generated plans exhibited similar accuracy in implant placement as those based on clinical plans. Conclusion: AI-assisted treatment planning for dental implant placement demonstrates promising results in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:S939 / S941
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Human vs. Machine: A Comparative Study on the Detection of AI-Generated Content
    Tadjine, Amal bou
    Harrag, Fouzi
    Shaalan, Khaled
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ASIAN AND LOW-RESOURCE LANGUAGE INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2025, 24 (02)
  • [22] 'AI-navigating' or 'AI-sinking'? An analysis of verbs in research articles titles suspicious of containing AI-generated/assisted content
    Comas-Forgas, Ruben
    Koulouris, Alexandros
    Kouis, Dimitris
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2025, 38 (01)
  • [23] Comparing the Willingness to Share for Human-generated vs. AI-generated Fake News
    Bashardoust, Amirsiavosh
    Feuerriegel, Stefan
    Shrestha, Yash Raj
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2024, 8 (CSCW2)
  • [24] Identification of Human-Generated vs AI-Generated Research Abstracts by Health Care Professionals
    Ren, Dennis
    Tagg, Andrew James
    Wilcox, Helena
    Roland, Damian
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2024, 178 (06) : 625 - 626
  • [25] Enhancing Breast Pathology: Clinical Validation of AI-Assisted Diagnosis
    Folarin, Olawunmi
    Edelweiss, Marcia
    Zhang, Hong
    Grabenstetter, Anne
    Giri, Dilip
    Wen, Hannah
    Hanna, Matthew
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2024, 104 (03) : S153 - S154
  • [26] AI-generated Clinical Histories for Radiology Reports: Closing the Information Gap
    Tavakoli, Neda
    Kim, Daniel
    RADIOLOGY, 2025, 314 (02)
  • [27] The importance of clinical experience in AI-assisted corneal diagnosis: verification using intentional AI misleading
    Maehara, Hiroki
    Ueno, Yuta
    Yamaguchi, Takefumi
    Kitaguchi, Yoshiyuki
    Miyazaki, Dai
    Nejima, Ryohei
    Inomata, Takenori
    Kato, Naoko
    Chikama, Tai-ichiro
    Ominato, Jun
    Yunoki, Tatsuya
    Tsubota, Kinya
    Oda, Masahiro
    Suzutani, Manabu
    Sekiryu, Tetsuju
    Oshika, Tetsuro
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [28] AI-assisted accelerated MRI of the ankle: clinical practice assessment
    Zhao, Qiang
    Xu, Jiajia
    Yang, Yu Xin
    Yu, Dan
    Zhao, Yuqing
    Wang, Qizheng
    Yuan, Huishu
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [29] Clinical impact of AI-assisted brain volumetry in patients with MS
    Chaves, Hernan
    Shalom, Diego
    Murua, Sofia Rodriguez
    Anania, Pilar
    Marrodan, Mariano
    Correale, Jorge
    Ysrraelit, Celica
    Ferrante, Enzo
    Slezak, Diego Fernandez
    Farez, Mauricio
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2023, 29 : 588 - 588
  • [30] Can AI-Generated Clinical Vignettes in Japanese Be Used Medically and Linguistically?
    Yanagita, Yasutaka
    Yokokawa, Daiki
    Uchida, Shun
    Li, Yu
    Uehara, Takanori
    Ikusaka, Masatomi
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, : 3282 - 3289