Comparing multispectral and hyperspectral UAV data for detecting peatland vegetation patterns

被引:3
|
作者
Pang, Yuwen [1 ]
Rasanen, Aleksi [2 ,3 ]
Wolff, Franziska [4 ]
Tahvanainen, Teemu [5 ]
Mannikko, Milja [6 ]
Aurela, Mika [6 ]
Korpelainen, Pasi [4 ]
Kumpula, Timo [4 ]
Virtanen, Tarmo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Ecosyst & Environm Res Program, Environm Change Res Unit ECRU, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Oulu, Finland
[3] Univ Oulu, Geog Res Unit, Oulu, Finland
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Geog & Hist Studies, Joensuu, Finland
[5] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Environm & Biol Sci, Joensuu, Finland
[6] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Peatland vegetation mapping; Hyperspectral remote sensing; Geographic object-based image analysis; Random forest; IMAGE-ANALYSIS; CARBON STOCKS; R PACKAGE; SEGMENTATION; COMMUNITIES; SCALE; CLASSIFICATION; SELECTION; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2024.104043
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Northern peatland vegetation exhibits fine-scale spatial and spectral heterogeneity that can potentially be captured with uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) data due to their ultra-high spatial resolution (<10 cm). From this perspective, the contribution of different spectral sensors in mapping various vegetation characteristics has not been thoroughly investigated. We delineated spatial patterns of plant community clusters, plant functional types (PFTs), and selected plant species with UAV hyperspectral (HS), UAV multispectral (MS), and airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) topography (TP) data in two northern peatlands. We conducted random forest (RF) regressions in a geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) framework and compared the relative contributions of the different datasets. In the best regression models, the percentage of explained variance was 24-74 % (RMSE:0.24-0.31), 40-90 % (RMSE:0.12-0.41), and 18-90 % (RMSE:0.03-0.40) for plant community clusters, PFTs, and plant species, respectively. The MS-TP combination had, in many cases, the highest performance, while HS-based models had better performance for some plant community clusters, PFTs, and plant species. TP features were useful only in certain situations. Overall, our results suggest that UAV MS imagery combined with TP data outperformed or performed at least almost as well as the models using UAV HS data and while all data combinations are capable for fine-scale detection of vegetation in northern peatlands. A more comprehensive investigations of data processing and methodology selection is needed to conclude if there is an added value of UAV HS data for peatland vegetation monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fourier analysis for detecting vegetation in hyperspectral images
    Chanchi-Golondrino, Gabriel E.
    Ospina-Alarcon, Manuel A.
    Saba, Manuel
    INGENIERIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD, 2024, 26 (03):
  • [22] The value of hyperspectral UAV imagery in characterizing tundra vegetation
    Putkiranta, Pauli
    Rasanen, Aleksi
    Korpelainen, Pasi
    Erlandsson, Rasmus
    Kolari, Tiina H. M.
    Pang, Yuwen
    Villoslada, Miguel
    Wolff, Franziska
    Kumpula, Timo
    Virtanen, Tarmo
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 308
  • [23] COTS UAV-borne Multispectral System for Vegetation Monitoring
    Kazantsev, Taras
    Shevchenko, Viktor
    Bondarenko, Oksana
    Furier, Mykhailo
    Samberg, Andre
    Ametov, Fevzi
    Iakovenko, Valerii
    REMOTE SENSING FOR AGRICULTURE, ECOSYSTEMS, AND HYDROLOGY XX, 2018, 10783
  • [24] Discrimination of arid vegetation with airborne multispectral scanner hyperspectral imagery
    Lewis, M
    Jooste, V
    de Gasparis, AA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 39 (07): : 1471 - 1479
  • [25] Environmental factors explaining the vegetation patterns in a temperate peatland
    Pellerin, Stephanie
    Lagneau, Louis-Adrien
    Lavoie, Martin
    Larocque, Marie
    COMPTES RENDUS BIOLOGIES, 2009, 332 (08) : 720 - 731
  • [26] Classification of Atlantic Coastal Sand Dune Vegetation Using In Situ, UAV, and Airborne Hyperspectral Data
    Laporte-Fauret, Quentin
    Lubac, Bertrand
    Castelle, Bruno
    Michalet, Richard
    Marieu, Vincent
    Bombrun, Lionel
    Launeau, Patrick
    Giraud, Manuel
    Normandin, Cassandra
    Rosebery, David
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [27] UAV hyperspectral and lidar data and their fusion for arid and semi-arid land vegetation monitoring
    Sankey, Temuulen T.
    McVay, Jason
    Swetnam, Tyson L.
    McClaran, Mitchel P.
    Heilman, Philip
    Nichols, Mary
    REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 4 (01) : 20 - 33
  • [28] New Generation and Old Generation Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data and their Comparisons with Multispectral Data in the Study of Global Agriculture and Vegetation
    Thenkabail, Prasad S.
    Aneece, Itiya
    Teluguntla, Pardhasaradhi
    Oliphant, Adam
    Foley, Daniel
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2022), 2022, : 5744 - 5745
  • [29] Remote sensing of terrestrial non-photosynthetic vegetation using hyperspectral, multispectral, SAR, and LiDAR data
    Li, Zhaoqin
    Guo, Xulin
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 40 (02): : 276 - 304
  • [30] IMAGE SHARPENING USING HYPERSPECTRAL AND MULTISPECTRAL DATA
    Mayumi, Norimasa
    Iwasaki, Akira
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2011, : 519 - 522