Comparing multispectral and hyperspectral UAV data for detecting peatland vegetation patterns

被引:3
|
作者
Pang, Yuwen [1 ]
Rasanen, Aleksi [2 ,3 ]
Wolff, Franziska [4 ]
Tahvanainen, Teemu [5 ]
Mannikko, Milja [6 ]
Aurela, Mika [6 ]
Korpelainen, Pasi [4 ]
Kumpula, Timo [4 ]
Virtanen, Tarmo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Ecosyst & Environm Res Program, Environm Change Res Unit ECRU, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Oulu, Finland
[3] Univ Oulu, Geog Res Unit, Oulu, Finland
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Geog & Hist Studies, Joensuu, Finland
[5] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Environm & Biol Sci, Joensuu, Finland
[6] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Peatland vegetation mapping; Hyperspectral remote sensing; Geographic object-based image analysis; Random forest; IMAGE-ANALYSIS; CARBON STOCKS; R PACKAGE; SEGMENTATION; COMMUNITIES; SCALE; CLASSIFICATION; SELECTION; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2024.104043
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Northern peatland vegetation exhibits fine-scale spatial and spectral heterogeneity that can potentially be captured with uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) data due to their ultra-high spatial resolution (<10 cm). From this perspective, the contribution of different spectral sensors in mapping various vegetation characteristics has not been thoroughly investigated. We delineated spatial patterns of plant community clusters, plant functional types (PFTs), and selected plant species with UAV hyperspectral (HS), UAV multispectral (MS), and airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) topography (TP) data in two northern peatlands. We conducted random forest (RF) regressions in a geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) framework and compared the relative contributions of the different datasets. In the best regression models, the percentage of explained variance was 24-74 % (RMSE:0.24-0.31), 40-90 % (RMSE:0.12-0.41), and 18-90 % (RMSE:0.03-0.40) for plant community clusters, PFTs, and plant species, respectively. The MS-TP combination had, in many cases, the highest performance, while HS-based models had better performance for some plant community clusters, PFTs, and plant species. TP features were useful only in certain situations. Overall, our results suggest that UAV MS imagery combined with TP data outperformed or performed at least almost as well as the models using UAV HS data and while all data combinations are capable for fine-scale detection of vegetation in northern peatlands. A more comprehensive investigations of data processing and methodology selection is needed to conclude if there is an added value of UAV HS data for peatland vegetation monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing the effectiveness of hyperspectral and multispectral data in detecting citrus nitrogen and water stresses
    Bhandari, Subodh
    Raheja, Amar
    Chaichi, Mohammad Reza
    Pham, Frank
    Sherman, Tristan
    Dohlen, Matthew
    Khan, Sharafat
    AUTONOMOUS AIR AND GROUND SENSING SYSTEMS FOR AGRICULTURAL OPTIMIZATION AND PHENOTYPING IV, 2019, 11008
  • [2] Comparing the Performance of Multispectral and Hyperspectral Images for Estimating Vegetation Properties
    Lu, Bing
    He, Yuhong
    Dao, Phuong D.
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 12 (06) : 1784 - 1797
  • [3] Harmonization of Hyperspectral and Multispectral Data for Calculation of Vegetation Index
    Nurmukhametov, A. L.
    Sidorchuk, D. S.
    Skidanov, R. V.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS, 2024, 69 (1-3) : 38 - 45
  • [4] Harmonization of Hyperspectral and Multispectral Data for Calculation of Vegetation Index
    Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
    127051, Russia
    不详
    443086, Russia
    不详
    443001, Russia
    J. Commun. Technol. Electron.,
  • [5] Detecting peatland vegetation patterns with multi-temporal field spectroscopy
    Pang, Yuwen
    Rasanen, Aleksi
    Lindholm, Viivi
    Aurela, Mika
    Virtanen, Tarmo
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 59 (01) : 2111 - 2126
  • [6] Detecting northern peatland vegetation patterns at ultra-high spatial resolution
    Rasanen, Aleksi
    Aurela, Mika
    Juutinen, Sari
    Kumpula, Timo
    Lohila, Annalea
    Penttila, Timo
    Virtanen, Tarmo
    REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 6 (04) : 457 - 471
  • [7] Comparing the Potential of Multispectral and Hyperspectral Data for Monitoring Oil Spill Impact
    Khanna, Shruti
    Santos, Maria J.
    Ustin, Susan L.
    Shapiro, Kristen
    Haverkamp, Paul J.
    Lay, Mui
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (02)
  • [8] Agreement analysis and spatial sensitivity of multispectral and hyperspectral sensors in detecting vegetation stress at management scales
    Morin, Mikindra
    Lawrence, Rick
    Repasky, Kevin
    Sterling, Tracy
    McCann, Cooper
    Powell, Scott
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 11
  • [9] Empirical Modelling of Vegetation Abundance from Airborne Hyperspectral Data for Upland Peatland Restoration Monitoring
    Cole, Beth
    McMorrow, Julia
    Evans, Martin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 6 (01) : 716 - 739
  • [10] Spectral unmixing of vegetation, soil and dry carbon cover in arid regions: comparing multispectral and hyperspectral observations
    Asner, GP
    Heidebrecht, KB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 23 (19) : 3939 - 3958