Price effects of residents' consumption carbon emissions: Evidence from rural and urban China

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Chengjun [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Rendong [3 ]
Fei, Ximin [3 ]
Li, Lei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Res Acad Rural Revitalizat Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou 311300, Peoples R China
[2] Hainan Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Haikou 571100, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Hangzhou 311300, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Consumption structure; Price elasticity; Carbon emissions; Demand system models; DEMOGRAPHIC DYNAMICS; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; INCOME INEQUALITY; FOOD-CONSUMPTION; DEMAND SYSTEMS; LIFE-STYLE; ENERGY USE; IMPACT; TAX; ELASTICITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107662
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Price policy applied to specific products may mitigate consumption carbon emissions (CCE). Nevertheless, the extent to which price effects, such as carbon taxes, differ across income groups and between rural and urban areas in China remains uncertain. With unbalanced provincial panel data from 1999 to 2020, we estimated the demand elasticities of eight major groups of consumer goods and services across income groups separately in rural and urban areas of China, using the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) and the Exact Affine Stone Index Implicit Marshallian demand system (EASI) in this study. The estimated price elasticities were then used to predict the impact of different price policies on CCE. The results show that taxing the wealthiest individuals and subsidizing the poorest individuals in both rural and urban areas have a beneficial impact on the reduction in CCE. Moreover, expanding transfer payments can further facilitate reductions in CCE. Our findings suggest that achieving CCE equality can be realized through intra-urban and intra-rural transfers, as well as urban-rural transfers achieved by taxing urban residents and subsidizing rural residents.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis on the environmental effect of renewable energy consumption by rural residents in daily life in China-from the perspectives of carbon emissions
    Chen Yan
    Zhu Yanli
    2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 : 1642 - 1646
  • [22] Diverse Effects of Consumer Credit on Household Carbon Emissions at Quantiles: Evidence from Urban China
    Xu, Xinkuo
    Han, Liyan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (09)
  • [23] Spatial Spillover Effects of Financial Development on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Urban Agglomerations in China
    Yuan, Ruixi
    Wang, Congqi
    Masron, Tajul Ariffin
    Liu, Pengzhen
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2025, 34 (03): : 3407 - 3423
  • [24] Analysis on Clothing Consumption Differences between Urban and Rural Residents in China
    Jianghong
    Zhaohong
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH, 2016, 69 : 142 - 147
  • [25] Rural Residents' Income Structure, Population Aging and Tourism Consumption: Evidence from China
    Zhao, Gaosong
    REVISTA DE CERCETARE SI INTERVENTIE SOCIALA, 2018, 63 : 200 - 219
  • [26] Studying the Relationship Between Coal Consumption and Health of Rural Residents: Evidence from China
    Cao, Zi
    Wei, Jie
    Fan, Hang
    Liu, Jun
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSIGHTS, 2025, 19
  • [27] The impact of fintech ecosystem on urban carbon emissions: evidence from China
    Huang, Jie
    Duan, Xinyu
    Dai, Shengli
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [28] Digital infrastructure empowerment and urban carbon emissions: Evidence from China
    Liao, Kaicheng
    Liu, Juan
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2024, 48 (06)
  • [29] The asymmetric effects of international oil prices, oil price uncertainty and income on urban residents? consumption in China
    Long, Shaobo
    Zhang, Rui
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2022, 74 : 789 - 805
  • [30] Factors of carbon emissions from Chinese urban and rural residents: a time-varying study
    Cheng, Yutai
    Xiao, Yao
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 29 (18) : 1696 - 1701