Responsibility to future generations: A strategy for combatting climate change across political divides
被引:1
|
作者:
Syropoulos, Stylianos
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Boston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USA
Boston Coll, Schiller Inst Integrated Sci & Soc, Boston, MA USABoston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USA
Syropoulos, Stylianos
[1
,2
]
Law, Kyle Fiore
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
SUNY Albany, Dept Psychol, Albany, NY USABoston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USA
Law, Kyle Fiore
[3
]
Kraft-Todd, Gordon
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Boston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USABoston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USA
Kraft-Todd, Gordon
[1
]
Mah, Andrea
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Amherst, MA USABoston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USA
Mah, Andrea
[4
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Markowitz, Ezra
[5
]
Young, Liane
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Boston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USABoston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USA
Young, Liane
[1
]
机构:
[1] Boston Coll, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boston, MA 02467 USA
[2] Boston Coll, Schiller Inst Integrated Sci & Soc, Boston, MA USA
[3] SUNY Albany, Dept Psychol, Albany, NY USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Amherst, MA USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA USA
climate change;
future generations;
legacy;
moral reframing;
responsibility;
PSYCHOLOGY;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1111/bjso.12775
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
Individuals and governments often fail to take action to address climate change owing largely to widespread politicization of the issue and related discourse. In response to recent appeals for non-partisan approaches to pro-environmentalism, we propose that highlighting one's responsibility to future generations (RFG) could offer promise across the political spectrum. We argue that RFG may be effective because it is widely endorsed, uncorrelated with demographic indicators and less tied to political ideology compared to other forms of responsibility, such as personal responsibility for climate change mitigation. Across six main and seven supplementary studies (N = 161,633), we provide evidence for these claims. RFG is not only widely endorsed across countries and demographic groups but it also significantly predicts various measures of pro-environmental behaviour, both in correlational and pre-registered experimental contexts. These findings confirm established effects, reconcile inconsistencies and suggest prioritizing intergenerational responsibility may effectively reshape climate change narratives for the most resistant parties.