Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Song, Bonnie B.
Anderson, Zachary S.
Masjedi, Aaron D.
Lee, Matthew W.
Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Klar, Maximilian
Roman, Lynda D.
Wright, Jason D.
Matsuo, Koji
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Div Gynecol Oncol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Freiburg, Germany
[5] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2024年 / 144卷 / 01期
关键词
PRESERVATION; POPULATION; OUTCOMES; WOMEN; REGRESSION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000005530
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To describe population-level utilization of fertility-sparing surgery and outcome of reproductive-aged patients with early epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent fertility-sparing surgery in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective study queried the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program. The study included 3,027 patients younger than age 50 years with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer receiving primary surgical therapy from 2007 to 2020. Fertility-sparing surgery was defined as preservation of one ovary and the uterus for unilateral lesion and preservation of the uterus for bilateral lesions. Temporal trend of fertility-sparing surgery was assessed with linear segmented regression with log-transformation. Overall survival associated with fertility-sparing surgery was assessed with Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: A total of 534 patients (17.6%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery. At the cohort level, the utilization of fertility-sparing surgery was 13.4% in 2007 and 21.8% in 2020 (P for trend=.009). Non-Hispanic White individuals (2.8-fold), those with high-grade serous histology (2.2-fold), and individuals with stage IC disease (2.3-fold) had a more than twofold increase in fertility-sparing surgery utilization during the study period (all P for trend<.05). After controlling for the measured clinicopathologic characteristics, patients who received fertility-sparing surgery had overall survival comparable with that of patients who had nonsparing surgery (5-year rates 93.6% vs 92.1%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI, 0.57-1.35). This survival association was consistent in high-grade serous (5-year rates 92.9% vs 92.4%), low-grade serous (100% vs 92.2%), clear cell (97.5% vs 86.1%), mucinous (92.1% vs 86.6%), low-grade endometrioid (95.7% vs 97.7%), and mixed (93.3% vs 83.7%) histology (all P>.05). In high-grade endometrioid tumor, fertility-sparing surgery was associated with decreased overall survival (5-year rates 71.9% vs 93.8%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.90, 95% CI, 1.09-7.67). Among bilateral ovarian lesions, fertility-sparing surgery was not associated with overall survival (5-year rates 95.8% vs 92.5%, P=.364). Among 41,914 patients who had epithelial ovarian cancer with any age and stage, those younger than age 50 years with stage I disease increased from 8.6% to 10.9% during the study period (P for trend=.002). CONCLUSION: Nearly one in five reproductive-aged patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer underwent fertility-sparing surgery in recent years in the United States. More than 90% of reproductive-aged patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent fertility-sparing surgery were alive at the 5-year timepoint, except for those with high-grade endometrioid tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 78
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of chemotherapy in patients with stage I mucinous ovarian cancer undergoing fertility-sparing surgery
    Long, Xingtao
    Li, Rengui
    Tang, Ying
    Yang, Lingling
    Zou, Dongling
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [22] Safety of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (06)
  • [23] Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for women of reproductive age with FIGO stage IC epithelial ovarian cancer
    Kashima, Katsunori
    Yahata, Tetsuro
    Fujita, Kazuyuki
    Tanaka, Kenichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 121 (01) : 53 - 55
  • [24] FEASIBILITY AND SAFETY OF FERTILITY-SPARING SURGERY IN EARLY-STAGE EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER WITH DENSE ADHESION
    Park, J.
    Baek, M. H.
    Rhim, C. C.
    Kim, D. Y.
    Suh, D. S.
    Kim, J. H.
    Kim, Y. M.
    Kim, Y. T.
    Nam, J. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 1466 - 1466
  • [25] Fertility sparing surgery in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer
    Ditto, Antonino
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Haeusler, Edward
    Carcangiu, Marialuisa
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) : 320 - 327
  • [26] Fertility-sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of oncological issues
    Bentivegna, E.
    Gouy, S.
    Maulard, A.
    Pautier, P.
    Leary, A.
    Colombo, N.
    Morice, P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (11) : 1994 - 2004
  • [27] Fertility-sparing surgery for stage II epithelial ovarian carcinoma: Analysis of oncologic outcomes
    Nasioudis, D.
    Frey, M.
    Chapman-Davis, E.
    Caputo, T. A.
    Witkin, S. S.
    Holcomb, M. M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 : 115 - 115
  • [28] Fertility-sparing surgery in stage I unilateral borderline ovarian tumor: is ovarian cystectomy safe?
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Kang, Ok-Ju
    Lee, Shin-Wha
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Suh, Dae Shik
    Kim, Yong Man
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (SUPPL_4) : A200 - A200
  • [29] Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review
    du Bois, Andreas
    Heitz, Florian
    Harter, Philipp
    ONKOLOGIE, 2013, 36 (7-8): : 436 - +
  • [30] Disparities in fertility-sparing surgery in adolescent and young women with stage I ovarian dysgerminoma
    Stafman, Laura L.
    Maizlin, Ilan I.
    Dellinger, Matthew
    Gow, Kenneth W.
    Goldfarb, Melanie
    Nuchtern, Jed G.
    Langer, Monica
    Vasudevan, Sanjeev A.
    Doski, John J.
    Goldin, Adam B.
    Raval, Mehul
    Beierle, Elizabeth A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 224 : 38 - 43