Comparative study on the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:2
|
作者
Yang, Jing [1 ]
Shang, Xianfu [1 ]
Li, Junbiao [1 ]
Wei, Ning [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, 99 West Huaihai Rd, Xuzhou 221006, Peoples R China
关键词
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE); hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC); hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); large; survival prognosis; RATIONALE;
D O I
10.21037/jgo-23-821
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are two new treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous studies had reported that TACE combined with HAIC conferred better survival benefit than TACE alone. The study was to evaluate the availability and safety of TACE combined with HAIC for the treatment of large HCC. Methods: Patients with unresectable large HCC who underwent TACE combined with HAIC (TACEHAIC group) and HAIC alone (HAIC group) at the Department of Interventional Radiology between August 2018 and September 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two groups by using log-rank test. The independent factors of OS of large HCC patients were investigated by Cox regression model. Results: A total of 73 patients (mean age, 59.8 +/- 8.8; 60 men) with unresectable large HCC were finally screened in the current study, including 32 who received TACE combined with HAIC and 41 who received HAIC alone. Compared with patients in HAIC group, TACE-HAIC group had higher median OS (37.1 vs. 14.9 months, P=0.0014). Similarly, PFS in the TACE-HAIC group was longer than that in the HAIC group (16.5 vs. 6.9 months, P=0.0037). The objective response rate (ORR) was 65.6% vs. 53.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90.6% vs. 78.0% in the two groups, neither was statistically significant (P=0.345 and 0.208, respectively). All AEs related to therapy were manageable, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of any grade and grade 3/4 AEs between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: TACE combined with HAIC yielded a promising prognosis in treating patients with large HCC compared with HAIC alone, with tolerable toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 355
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chemotherapy for transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wu, Jie
    Song, Lei
    Zhao, Dan-Yi
    Guo, Bing
    Liu, Jing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (31) : 10960 - 10968
  • [32] Chemoembolization alone vs combined chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma patients
    Gao, Song
    Zhang, Peng-Jun
    Guo, Jian-Hai
    Chen, Hui
    Xu, Hai-Feng
    Liu, Peng
    Yang, Ren-Jie
    Zhu, Xu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (36) : 10443 - 10452
  • [33] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Large Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Zhang, Haixia
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Peng, Ye
    Tan, Chongqing
    Wan, Xiaomin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [34] Chemoembolization alone vs combined chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma patients
    Song Gao
    Peng-Jun Zhang
    Jian-Hai Guo
    Hui Chen
    Hai-Feng Xu
    Peng Liu
    Ren-Jie Yang
    Xu Zhu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (36) : 10443 - 10452
  • [35] Transarterial chemoembolization as salvage therapy after unsuccessful hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Fukumori, Kazuta
    Yan, Yoichi
    Ando, Eiji
    Sumie, Shur
    Kuwaki, Kotoro
    Yamashita, Fumihiko
    Tanaka, Masatoshi
    Sata, Michio
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2008, 1 (04) : 521 - 524
  • [36] Transarterial chemoembolization versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as first treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion
    He, Benyi
    Deng, Min
    Li, Shaohua
    Mei, Jie
    Lu, Lianghe
    Zuo, Zhijun
    Guo, Rongping
    Wei, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 22 (06): : 1415 - 1424
  • [37] Efficacy and safety analysis of selective hepatic vein occlusion combined with arterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Chang, Jiang
    Wang, Haochen
    Li, Jian
    Jin, Long
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (02) : 710 - 720
  • [38] Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibodies with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy or Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Yu, Bingran
    Zhang, Ning
    Feng, Yun
    Zhang, Yongfa
    Zhang, Ti
    Wang, Lu
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA, 2023, 10 : 1735 - 1748
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of cisplatin versus miriplatin in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and transarterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial
    Otsuji, Kentarou
    Takai, Koji
    Nishigaki, Yoichi
    Shimizu, Shougo
    Hayashi, Hideki
    Imai, Kenji
    Suzuki, Yusuke
    Hanai, Tatsunori
    Ideta, Takayasu
    Miyazaki, Tsuneyuki
    Tomita, Eiichi
    Shimizu, Masahito
    Moriwaki, Hisataka
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 45 (05) : 514 - 522
  • [40] Safety and Short-term Efficacy of Licartin Combined with Conventional Transcatheter Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Yu, Z.
    Zhang, Y.
    Nie, C.
    Zhou, T.
    Zhou, G.
    Zhu, T.
    Chen, X.
    Wang, B.
    Chen, S.
    Li, Jing
    Wu, Li-Ming
    Zheng, S.
    Sun, J.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 82 : 40 - 44