Comparison of two percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy

被引:1
|
作者
Karkin, Kadir [1 ,4 ]
Aydamirov, Mubariz [2 ]
Aksay, Bugra [1 ]
Kaplan, Eyuep [3 ]
Gurlen, Guclu [1 ]
Altunkol, Adem [1 ]
Ortaoglu, Ferhat [1 ]
Akgun, Omer Faruk [1 ]
Vuruskan, Ediz [1 ]
Gurbuz, Zafer Gokhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ, Adana City Training & Res Hosp, Urol Clin, Adana, Turkiye
[2] Baskent Univ, Alanya Applicat & Res Ctr, Alanya, Turkiye
[3] Abdulkadir Yuksel State Hosp, Urol Clin, Gaziantep, Turkiye
[4] Hlth Sci Univ, Adana City Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Pediatric Kidney Stones; PRESCHOOL AGE CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; INFANTS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.4081/aiua.2024.12369
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: In this study, the aim was to compare the results of mini and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones. Materials and Methods: Data for 128 patients < 18 years of age who underwent mini and standard PCNL due to pediatric kidney stones were retrospectively examined. Patients were divided into two groups: mini-PCNL (16-20 Fr) and standard PCNL (26 Fr). Surgery time, number of punctures to the pelvicalyceal system, hospital stay, postoperative hemoglobin drop, complications and stone-free status (SFR) were compared between the groups. Additional surgical intervention (double-J stent, ureterorenoscopy, secondary PCNL) performed after the surgery was recorded. The absence of residual stones or < 3 mm residual stones on kidney, ureter and bladder radiography (KUB) and ultrasonography (USG) performed in the third postoperative month were accepted as success criteria. Results: There were 32 (43.8%) patients in the mini-PCNL group and 41 (56.2%) patients in the standard PCNL group. The mean age was 9.3 +/- 4.1 years in the mini-PCNL group and 10.1 +/- 5.4 years in the standard PCNL group. Mean stone size in the mini-PCNL group was 2.1 +/- 1.2; while for standard PCNL it was 2.3 +/- 1.4. The mean surgery time was statistically significantly higher in the mini-PCNL group (p = 0.005). There was no difference between the groups in terms of intraoperative double J stent use, postoperative complications and SFR. A double J stent was inserted in two patients in the mini-PCNL group and in one patient in the standard PCNL group due to urine leakage from the nephrostomy tract in the postoperative period. Although the postoperative hemoglobin drop was found to be significantly higher in standard PCNL (p = 0.001), hematuria and blood transfusion rates were low in both groups. Mean hospital stay was shorter in the mini-PCNL group compared to standard PCNL (3.6 +/- 1.2 days vs. 2.5 +/- 1.1; p = 0.018). Conclusions: Although mini-PCNL has longer surgery time compared to standard PCNL, it should be preferred for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones due to advantages such as similar success and complication rates to standard PCNL, short hospital stay and less postoperative hemoglobin drop.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Standard versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis
    Deng, J.
    Li, J.
    Wang, L.
    Hong, Y.
    Zheng, L.
    Hu, J.
    Kuang, R.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 110 (03) : 301 - 311
  • [22] Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy the way to go for renal stones? Yes!
    Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
    Desai, Janak D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 309 - 311
  • [23] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is smaller better for kidney stones in patients with neurogenic bladder?
    Bouteille, C.
    Pere, M.
    Chelghaf, I.
    Rigaud, J.
    Madec, F. X.
    Perrouin-Verbe, M. -A.
    Loubersac, T.
    FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 34 (01):
  • [24] Our Experience of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Kidney Stones
    Ekici, Musa
    Nalbant, Ismail
    Goktug, Hasan Nedim Goksel
    Sener, Nevzat Can
    Zengin, Kursad
    Sertcelik, Nurettin
    ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 35 (02) : 68 - 71
  • [25] Experience of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Large Impacted Proximal Ureteral Stones
    Long, Qilai
    Guo, Jianming
    Xu, Zhibing
    Yang, Yuanfeng
    Wang, Hang
    Zhu, Yanjun
    Zhang, Yongkang
    Wang, Guomin
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 90 (04) : 384 - 388
  • [26] The role of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney stones
    Tepeler, Abdulkadir
    Basibuyuk, Ismail
    Tosun, Muhammed
    Armagan, Abdullah
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 42 (04): : 261 - 266
  • [27] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an initial Australian experience
    Hennessey, D.
    Kinnear, N.
    Troy, A.
    Jack, G.
    Angus, D.
    Bolton, D.
    Webb, D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 85 - 85
  • [28] Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for multiple nephrolithiasis
    Lv, Guangda
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Du, Fei
    Qi, Wenqiang
    Zhong, Minglei
    Zhou, Yongheng
    Zhou, Changkuo
    Li, Yan
    Zhang, Dongqing
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [29] The effectiveness and safety of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Thien Phuc Hoang
    Le Chuyen Vu
    Manh Linh Phan
    Cao Tri Duong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 13 - 14
  • [30] Comparison of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position
    Bildirici, Cagdas
    Cetin, Taha
    Yalcin, Mehmet Yigit
    Ozbilen, Mert Hamza
    Karaca, Erkin
    Karabacak, Mahmut Can
    Cakici, Mehmet caglar
    Suelozgen, Tufan
    Koc, Gokhan
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 52 (01)