A systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials evaluating colchicine for cardiovascular prevention: There is an elephant in the room

被引:1
|
作者
Alunno, Alessia [1 ]
Martini, Cecilia [1 ]
Moronti, Veronica [1 ]
Santilli, Jessica [1 ]
Schoones, Jan W. [2 ]
Mariani, Francesco Maria [1 ]
Di Ruscio, Evy [1 ]
Altieri, Piera [1 ]
Ferri, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, San Salvatore Hosp, Dept Clin Med Life Hlth & Environm Sci, Internal Med & Nephrol Div, Laquila, Italy
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Directorate Res Policy, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Colchicine; Cardiovascular risk; Cardiovascular prevention; Rheumatic disease; POSTOPERATIVE ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; LOW-DOSE-COLCHICINE; POSTPERICARDIOTOMY-SYNDROME; ANTIINFLAMMATORY TREATMENT; SYNDROME COPPS; RESTENOSIS; RECURRENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejim.2023.12.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To review randomised controlled trials (RCT) investigating colchicine (COL) for cardiovascular (CV) prevention in patients at high to very high CV risk aiming to extract data that could be useful in rheumatology practice. Methods: A systematic search of multiple databases according to the PICO framework was performed from inception to April 3, 2023. Three researchers independently screened abstracts/titles and reviewed full texts reviewed. Data extraction was performed using a pilot-tested data extraction form. Results: A total of 14,096 references were retrieved by the search and 30 articles, describing 28 RCTs, were included in the review (Total number of patients 16,795, of which 8,463 randomised to COL; dose 0.5-2 mg/day, treatment duration 1day-29 months). Only one of the 28 RCTs provided clear information on whether patients with rheumatic diseases (more specifically gout) were enrolled in the study cohorts and previous use of COL was an exclusion criterion only in 14 (50 %) RCTs. Previous therapy with glucocorticoids and/or non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs and/or immune suppressive therapies was an exclusion criterion only in 9 (32 %) RCTs. Conclusion: Our results highlight the need to redefine the eligibility criteria as well as the reporting of results in future RCTs in order to minimise bias or previous exposure to COL and also obtain data that could be useful in rheumatology practice.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Systematic review of definitions and methods of measuring falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials
    Hauer, K
    Lamb, SE
    Jorstad, EC
    Todd, C
    Becker, C
    AGE AND AGEING, 2006, 35 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [23] Randomised controlled trials on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diabetes in African countries: a systematic review
    Sandholzer-Yilmaz, Angelika Sabine
    Kroeber, Eric Sven
    Ayele, Wondimu
    Frese, T.
    Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna
    Unverzagt, Susanne
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05): : e050021
  • [24] Effects of herbs and spices on blood pressure: a systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials
    Driscoll, Kate S.
    Appathurai, Amanda
    Jois, Markandeya
    Radcliffe, Jessica E.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2019, 37 (04) : 671 - 679
  • [25] Randomised controlled trials of yoga interventions for women with breast cancer: a systematic literature review
    H. Harder
    L. Parlour
    V. Jenkins
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012, 20 : 3055 - 3064
  • [26] Randomised controlled trials of yoga interventions for women with breast cancer: a systematic literature review
    Harder, H.
    Parlour, L.
    Jenkins, V.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (12) : 3055 - 3064
  • [27] Randomised controlled trials addressing Australian Aboriginal health needs: A systematic review of the literature
    Morris, PS
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 1999, 35 (02) : 130 - 135
  • [28] Randomised controlled trials of homeopathy in humans: characterising the research journal literature for systematic review
    Mathie, Robert T.
    Hacke, Daniela
    Clausen, Juergen
    Nicolai, Ton
    Riley, David S.
    Fisher, Peter
    HOMEOPATHY, 2013, 102 (01) : 3 - 24
  • [29] 223 The Definition of a Hemodynamic Significant Duct in Randomised Controlled Trials, a Systematic Literature Review
    I Zonnenberg
    K De Waal
    Pediatric Research, 2010, 68 : 116 - 117
  • [30] Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review
    Meher, S.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (10) : 1188 - 1194