Patient-Centered Quality Measures for Dialysis Care: A Report of a Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation

被引:9
|
作者
Weiner, Daniel E. [1 ]
Delgado, Cynthia [2 ,3 ]
Flythe, Jennifer E. [6 ]
Forfang, Derek L. [4 ]
Manley, Thomas [7 ]
McGonigal, Lisa J.
McNamara, Elizabeth [8 ]
Murphy, Heather [7 ]
Roach, Jesse L.
Watnick, Suzanne G. [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Weinhandl, Eric [5 ,11 ,12 ]
Willis, Kerry [7 ]
Berns, Jeffrey S.
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[2] San Francisco Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Natl Kidney Fdn, San Pablo, CA USA
[5] Satellite Healthcare, San Jose, CA USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Natl Kidney Fdn, New York, NY USA
[8] Northwest Kidney Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[9] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA USA
[10] Puget Sound VA, Seattle, WA USA
[11] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[12] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
STANDARDIZED OUTCOMES; OLDER-ADULTS; ASSOCIATION; NEPHROLOGY; MORTALITY; CHILDREN; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.09.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Providing high-quality patient-centered care is the central mission of dialysis facilities. Assessing quality and patient-centeredness of dialysis care is necessary for continuous dialysis facility improvement. Based predominantly on readily measured items, current quality measures in dialysis care emphasize biochemical and utilization outcomes, with very few patient-reported items. Additionally, current metrics often do not account for patient preferences and may compromise patient-centered care by limiting the ability of providers to individualize care targets, such as dialysis adequacy, based on patient priorities rather than a fi xed numerical target. Developing, implementing, and maintaining a quality program using readily quanti fi able data while also allowing for individualization of care targets that emphasize the goals of patients and their care partners provided the motivation for a September 2022 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Workshop on Patient-Centered Quality Measures for Dialysis Care. Workshop participants focused on 4 questions: (1) What are the outcomes that are most important to patients and their care partners? (2) How can social determinants of health be accounted for in quality measures? (3) How can individualized care be effectively addressed in population-level quality programs? (4) What are the optimal means for collecting valid and robust patient-reported outcome data? Workshop participants identi fi ed numerous gaps within the current quality system and favored a conceptually broader, but not larger, quality system that stresses highly meaningful and adaptive measures that incorporate patient-centered principles, individual life goals, and social risk factors. Workshop participants also identi fi ed a need for new, low-burden tools to assess patient goals and priorities.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 647
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Morbidity and mortality in redefining adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: A step beyond the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative
    Chatoth, DK
    Golper, TA
    Gokal, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1999, 33 (04) : 617 - 632
  • [12] Implementation of the National Kidney Foundation's Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative: The need for continued renal community involvement
    Eknoyan, G
    Levin, NW
    SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 1997, 10 (01) : 9 - 10
  • [13] Patient-centered inpatient psychiatry is associated with outcomes, ownership, and national quality measures
    Shields, Morgan C.
    Hollander, Mara A. G.
    Busch, Alisa B.
    Kantawala, Zohra
    Rosenthal, Meredith B.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR, 2023, 1 (01):
  • [14] What are the major changes in dialysis practice recommended by the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI)?
    Eknoyan, G
    Levin, NW
    SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 1997, 10 (03) : 151 - 157
  • [15] The role of providers in implementation of the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative: Fresenius Medical Care North America perspective
    Lazarus, JM
    Wick, G
    Borella, L
    ADVANCES IN RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 1999, 6 (01): : 59 - 66
  • [16] National kidney foundation: Dialysis outcome quality initiative - Development of methodology for clinical practice guidelines
    Levin, N
    Eknoyan, G
    Pipp, M
    Steinberg, E
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 12 (10) : 2060 - 2063
  • [17] Hyperuricemia, Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Report of a Scientific Workshop Organized by the National Kidney Foundation
    Johnson, Richard J.
    Bakris, George L.
    Borghi, Claudio
    Chonchol, Michel B.
    Feldman, David
    Lanaspa, Miguel A.
    Merriman, Tony R.
    Moe, Orson W.
    Mount, David B.
    Sanchez Lozada, Laura Gabriella
    Stahl, Eli
    Weiner, Daniel E.
    Chertow, Glenn M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 71 (06) : 851 - 865
  • [18] Optimizing vascular access: A team perspective using the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Guidelines
    Brouwer, DJ
    ADVANCES IN RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 1999, 6 (01): : 93 - 96
  • [19] Introduction of Biosimilar Therapeutics Into Nephrology Practice in the United States: Report of a Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation
    Wish, Jay B.
    Charytan, Chaim
    Chertow, Glenn M.
    Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar
    Kliger, Alan S.
    Rubin, Robert J.
    Yee, Jerry
    Fishbane, Steven
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2016, 68 (06) : 843 - 852
  • [20] The Role of Vitamin D in CKD Stages 3 to 4: Report of a Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation
    Melamed, Michal L.
    Chonchol, Michel
    Gutierrez, Orlando M.
    Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar
    Kendrick, Jessica
    Norris, Keith
    Scialla, Julia J.
    Thadhani, Ravi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 72 (06) : 834 - 845