Segmentation of Spinal Computed Tomography to Produce Biomechanically Accurate patient-specific Surgical Models

被引:0
|
作者
Button, Kaelyn L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zaretsky, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pfleging, Kasey M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Malueg, Megan [2 ]
Kruk, Marissa [2 ]
Mullin, Jeffrey [2 ]
Ionita, Ciprian N. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Biomed Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Neurosurg, Buffalo, NY 14203 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Canon Stroke & Vasc Res Ctr, Buffalo, NY 14203 USA
关键词
spine; computed tomography; image segmentation; 3D printing; surgical models; patient-specific; DEFORMITY;
D O I
10.1117/12.3006426
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: Improved Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) surgery outcomes can be achieved with precise anatomical and biomechanical models. Traditional cadavers, limited by scarcity and cost, may not fully meet specific anatomical needs. Patient-tailored 3D-printed spine models offer a promising alternative. This study, leveraging medical image segmentation, CAD, and advanced 3D printing techniques, explores the potential of patient-specific 3D-printed spine models. Materials & Methods: 3DSlicer was used for image segmentation, and MeshMixer for model smoothing. 3D-printing, with Stratasys J750T, specialized for anatomical modeling, integrated materials simulating bone structures, soft tissues, and intervertebral discs. Quantitative material testing was completed on samples of each printed tissue type individually, qualitative model testing and quantitative pilot displacement-controlled load flexion/extension testing were completed on L3-L5 vertebral models. Results: The 3D-printing process for these detailed functional unit models was completed within approximately 20 hours. Qualitative assessment by neurosurgical residents affirmed the models' resemblance to human spinal tissue in a simulated procedural context. However, mechanical testing of the material samples revealed discrepancies when compared to established biomechanical properties in the literature. This suggests that while the models provide a degree of procedural realism, their material properties require further refinement to fully replicate the biomechanical characteristics of actual spinal tissues. Additional testing on the L3-L5 model is planned to further investigate these findings. Conclusions: Using medical image segmentation and advanced 3D-printing techniques, we introduce a method for swiftly generating anatomically and biomechanically accurate spine models tailored to individual patients. This approach has transformative potential for ASD pre-surgical planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ACCURATE PATIENT-SPECIFIC MACHINE LEARNING MODELS OF GLIOBLASTOMA INVASION USING TRANSFER LEARNING
    Hu, Leland
    Yoon, Hyunsoo
    Eschbacher, Jennifer
    Baxter, Leslie
    Smith, Kris
    Nakaji, Peter
    Mcgee, Samuel
    Dueck, Amylou
    Quarles, Christopher
    Karis, John
    Hawkins-Daarud, Andrea
    Jackson, Pamela
    Massey, Susan
    Wu, Teresa
    Swanson, Kristin
    Li, Jing
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 : 157 - 158
  • [32] Patient-Specific Atrium Models for Training and Pre-Procedure Surgical Planning
    Laing, Justin
    Moore, John
    Bainbridge, Daniel
    Drangova, Maria
    Peters, Terry
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2017, 10135
  • [33] Optimization of surgical parameters based on patient-specific models: Application to arcuate keratotomy
    Truffer, Oskar
    Abler, Daniel
    Pajic, Bojan
    Grabner, Guenther
    Kraker, Hannes
    Buechler, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (08): : 1084 - 1091
  • [34] Cardiac patient-specific three-dimensional models as surgical planning tools
    Bateman, Michael G.
    Durfee, William K.
    Iles, Tinen L.
    Martin, Cindy M.
    Liao, Kenneth
    Erdman, Arthur G.
    Iaizzo, Paul A.
    SURGERY, 2020, 167 (02) : 259 - 263
  • [35] Effects of Degree of Surgical Correction for Flatfoot Deformity in Patient-Specific Computational Models
    Spratley, E. M.
    Matheis, E. A.
    Hayes, C. W.
    Adelaar, R. S.
    Wayne, J. S.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 43 (08) : 1947 - 1956
  • [36] Accurate Patient-Specific Machine Learning Models of Glioblastoma Invasion Using Transfer Learning
    Hu, L. S.
    Yoon, H.
    Eschbacher, J. M.
    Baxter, L. C.
    Dueck, A. C.
    Nespodzany, A.
    Smith, K. A.
    Nakaji, P.
    Xu, Y.
    Wang, L.
    Karis, J. P.
    Hawkins-Daarud, A. J.
    Singleton, K. W.
    Jackson, P. R.
    Anderies, B. J.
    Bendok, B. R.
    Zimmerman, R. S.
    Quarles, C.
    Porter-Umphrey, A. B.
    Mrugala, M. M.
    Sharma, A.
    Hoxworth, J. M.
    Sattur, M. G.
    Sanai, N.
    Koulemberis, P. E.
    Krishna, C.
    Mitchell, J. R.
    Wu, T.
    Tran, N. L.
    Swanson, K. R.
    Li, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2019, 40 (03) : 418 - 425
  • [37] Effects of Degree of Surgical Correction for Flatfoot Deformity in Patient-Specific Computational Models
    E. M. Spratley
    E. A. Matheis
    C. W. Hayes
    R. S. Adelaar
    J. S. Wayne
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2015, 43 : 1947 - 1956
  • [38] Patient-specific models of cardiac biomechanics
    Krishnamurthy, Adarsh
    Villongco, Christopher T.
    Chuang, Joyce
    Frank, Lawrence R.
    Nigam, Vishal
    Belezzuoli, Ernest
    Stark, Paul
    Krummen, David E.
    Narayan, Sanjiv
    Omens, Jeffrey H.
    McCulloch, Andrew D.
    Kerckhoffs, Roy C. P.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2013, 244 : 4 - 21
  • [39] Patient-Specific Simulation of Cardiac Blood Flow From High-Resolution Computed Tomography
    Lantz, Jonas
    Henriksson, Lilian
    Persson, Anders
    Karlsson, Matts
    Ebbers, Tino
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2016, 138 (12):
  • [40] Semi-Automated Construction of Patient-Specific Aortic Valves from Computed Tomography Images
    Lior, Dan
    Puelz, Charles
    Edwards, Colin
    Molossi, Silvana
    Griffith, Boyce E.
    Birla, Ravi K.
    Rusin, Craig G.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 51 (01) : 189 - 199