MULTIFIDELITY UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR ONLINE SIMULATIONS OF AUTOMOTIVE PROPULSION SYSTEMS

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Hang [1 ]
Gorodetsky, Alex [2 ]
Fujii, Yuji [3 ]
Wang, Kon-Well [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Mech Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Ford Motor Co, Res & Adv Engn, Dearborn, MI 48124 USA
关键词
POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; PROPAGATION; EXPANSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The increasing complexity and demanding performance requirement of modern automotive propulsion systems necessitate more intelligent and robust predictive controls. Due to the significant uncertainties from both unavoidable modeling errors and probabilistic environmental disturbances, the ability to quantify the effect of these uncertainties to the system behaviors is of crucial importance to enable advanced control designs for automotive propulsion systems. Furthermore, the quantification of uncertainty must be computationally efficient such that it can be conducted on board a vehicle in real-time. However, traditional uncertainty quantification methods for complicated nonlinear systems, such as Monte Carlo, often rely on sampling - a computationally prohibitive process for many applications. Previous research has shown promises of using spectral decomposition methods such as generalized Polynomial Chaos to reduce the online computational cost of uncertainty quantification. However, such method suffers from scalability and bias issues. This paper seeks to alleviate these computational bottlenecks by developing a multifidelity uncertainty quantification method that combines low-order generalized Polynomial Chaos with Monte Carlo estimation via Control Variates. Results on the mean and variance estimates of the axle shaft torque show that the proposed method can correct the bias of low-order Polynomial Chaos expansions while significantly reducing variance compared to the conventional Monte Carlo.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multifidelity Surrogate Models for Efficient Uncertainty Propagation Analysis in Salars Systems
    Christelis, Vasileios
    Hughes, Andrew G.
    FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2022, 4
  • [42] Uncertainty quantification of dynamic earthquake rupture simulations
    Daub, Eric G.
    Arabnejad, Hamid
    Mahmood, Imran
    Groen, Derek
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2021, 379 (2197):
  • [43] Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in generic MonteCarlo simulations
    Saracco, P.
    Batie, M.
    Hoff, G.
    Pia, M. G.
    2012 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2012, : 651 - 656
  • [44] Uncertainty quantification of shock–bubble interaction simulations
    J. Jin
    X. Deng
    Y. Abe
    F. Xiao
    Shock Waves, 2019, 29 : 1191 - 1204
  • [45] Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations
    Mathelin, L
    Hussaini, MY
    Zang, TA
    NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 2005, 38 (1-3) : 209 - 236
  • [46] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF PARAMETRIC ROLL
    Duz, Bulent
    Ypma, Egbert
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 37TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2018, VOL 7A, 2018,
  • [47] Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations
    Lionel Mathelin
    M. Yousuff Hussaini
    Thomas A. Zang
    Numerical Algorithms, 2005, 38 : 209 - 236
  • [48] Multifidelity Sparse-Grid-Based Uncertainty Quantification for the Hokkaido Nansei-oki Tsunami
    de Baar, Jouke H. S.
    Roberts, Stephen G.
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2017, 174 (08) : 3107 - 3121
  • [49] Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: A review
    Xiao, Heng
    Cinnella, Paola
    PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2019, 108 : 1 - 31
  • [50] Evaluation of SOFC Hybrid Systems for Automotive Propulsion Applications
    Rajashekara, Kaushik
    MacBain, John A.
    Grieve, M. James
    CONFERENCE RECORD OF THE 2006 IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, FORTY-FIRST IAS ANNUAL MEETING, VOL 1-5, 2006, : 1593 - 1597