Comprehensive Evaluation of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic Dental Implant Materials: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical and Esthetic Properties

被引:0
|
作者
Peter, Claudia [1 ]
Shah, Krupali [2 ]
Simon, Lovebin [3 ]
Shyama, P. M. [4 ]
Ashwathi, N. [5 ]
El-Shamy, Fahiem Mohammad [6 ]
机构
[1] Rajas Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Tirunelveli, India
[2] KM Shah Dent Coll & Hosp, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Dept Periodontol & Implantol, Vadodara, India
[3] Century Dent Coll, Dept Prosthodont, Thekkil, India
[4] Kunhitharuvai Mem Charitable Trust KMCT Dent Coll, Dept Prosthodont, Kozhikode, India
[5] Kannur Dent Coll, Dept Orthodont, Anjarakandy, India
[6] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Biomat, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
implants; ceramics; titanium; aesthetic properties; zirconia; TRANSLUCENT ZIRCONIA;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.60582
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant materials play a pivotal role in the success of restorative dentistry. This study comprehensively compares the mechanical and esthetic properties of three commonly used dental implant materials: titanium, zirconia, and ceramic. Objective: This study aimed to provide insights into the suitability of titanium, zirconia, and ceramic for various clinical applications within implant dentistry. Methods: Ninety dental implants, 30 for each material, were selected based on their well -established usage in dental implantology. Mechanical properties, including tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and fatigue resistance, were assessed using state-of-the-art testing machines. Esthetic properties, such as color stability and translucency, were scrutinized through immersion in staining solutions and spectrophotometer measurements. Fracture properties and biocompatibility were also evaluated. Results: Mechanical testing revealed that titanium exhibited the highest tensile strength (810 +/- 55 MPa), while zirconia demonstrated the highest modulus of elasticity (208 +/- 8 GPa). Titanium also displayed the greatest fatigue resistance (1,010,000 +/- 95,000 cycles), whereas zirconia had the highest hardness (1190 +/- 45 Vickers hardness number (VHN)). Esthetically, zirconia showed superior color stability ( Delta E: 1.7 +/- 0.2), while ceramic exhibited the highest translucency (TP%: 15.3 +/- 1.7). Zirconia presented the lowest surface roughness (0.28 +/- 0.04 mu m). Conclusion: This study provides insights into potential dental implant material performance, with zirconia emerging as a promising alternative. Future research should validate these findings in clinical settings, considering a broader array of variables and long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optical Properties of Five Esthetic Ceramic Materials Used for Monolithic Restorations: A Comparative In Vitro Study
    Almohammed, Saleh N.
    Alshorman, Belal
    Abu-Naba'a, Layla A.
    CERAMICS-SWITZERLAND, 2022, 5 (04): : 961 - 980
  • [32] A Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Nanofibrous Materials
    Lybun, German P.
    Bessudnova, Nadezda O.
    SARATOV FALL MEETING 2013: OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN BIOPHYSICS AND MEDICINE XV; AND LASER PHYSICS AND PHOTONICS XV, 2014, 9031
  • [33] Corrosion Resistance of Titanium Dental Implant Abutments: Comparative Analysis and Surface Characterization
    Kowalski, Jakub
    Rylska, Dorota
    Januszewicz, Bartlomiej
    Konieczny, Bartlomiej
    Cichomski, Michal
    Matinlinna, Jukka P.
    Radwanski, Mateusz
    Sokolowski, Jerzy
    Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (20)
  • [34] Chemo-mechanical effects on the tribocorrosion behavior of titanium/ceramic dental implant pairs in artificial saliva
    Dalmau Borras, A.
    Buch, A. Roda
    Rovira Cardete, A.
    Navarro-Laboulais, J.
    Munoz, A. Igual
    WEAR, 2019, 426 : 162 - 170
  • [35] Zirconia Based Dental Biomaterials: Structure, Mechanical Properties, Biocompatibility, Surface Modification, and Applications as Implant
    Lin, Hua
    Yin, Cuilan
    Mo, Anchun
    FRONTIERS IN DENTAL MEDICINE, 2021, 2
  • [36] Comparative analysis on the precision fit of dental prosthesis between the variously fabricated copings of nickel-chromium alloy, titanium and zirconia ceramic
    Lee, S. W.
    Kim, J. W.
    Hwang, S. H.
    Han, D. H.
    Moon, H. S.
    BIOCERAMICS, VOL 19, PTS 1 AND 2, 2007, 330-332 : 1373 - +
  • [37] Comparative In Vitro Evaluation Between Zirconia and Veneer Ceramic Materials Using Different Techniques
    Abdullah, Adil O.
    Yu, Hui
    Sun Xudong
    Muhammed, Fenik K.
    Pollington, Sarah
    Liu, Yi
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2019, 28 (11) : 6656 - 6668
  • [38] Comparative In Vitro Evaluation Between Zirconia and Veneer Ceramic Materials Using Different Techniques
    Adil O. Abdullah
    Hui Yu
    Sun Xudong
    Fenik K. Muhammed
    Sarah Pollington
    Yi Liu
    Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2019, 28 : 6656 - 6668
  • [39] Structure and mechanical properties of ceramic materials based on alumina and zirconia with strontium hexaaluminate additives
    Cherkasova, Nina
    Veselov, Sergey
    Bataev, Anatoly
    Kuzmin, Ruslan
    Stukacheva, Natalia
    MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 259
  • [40] Structure and mechanical properties of ceramic materials based on alumina and zirconia with strontium hexaaluminate additives
    Cherkasova, Nina
    Veselov, Sergey
    Bataev, Anatoly
    Kuzmin, Ruslan
    Stukacheva, Natalia
    Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2021, 259