Net zero vs. carbon neutrality: supply chain management challenges and future research agenda

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Guo [1 ]
Lim, Ming K. [1 ,2 ]
Yeo, WeeMeng [1 ]
Tseng, Ming-Lang [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Grad Sch Business, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Asia Univ, Inst Innovat & Circular Econ, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ, China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
Net zero; carbon neutrality; supply chain management; life cycle assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; ENERGY; EMISSIONS; FOREST; IMPACT; STRATEGIES; WASTE; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/13675567.2024.2359058
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Climate change endangers human survival, causing heat waves, floods, storms, polar ice loss, ocean acidification and rising sea levels. These effects harm the food supply and living environments and contribute to chronic diseases. Climate agreements like the Paris Agreement and Kyoto Protocol set net-zero emissions and carbon neutrality targets. However, their definitions, differences and challenges need clarification. This paper reviews net zero and carbon neutrality initiatives in supply chain management. CiteSpace analysis of 61 articles on net zero and 44 on carbon neutrality highlights their differences, challenges, practices and research gaps. Net-zero emissions cover more greenhouse gases and emission stages, fitting supply chain management through life-cycle assessment. A life-cycle perspective and strategies like bio-based materials, optimised transportation and electric vehicles are recommended for effective mitigation. Finally, the paper identifies research gaps at global, country, industry and company levels, suggesting research questions for future exploration.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda
    K. Katsaliaki
    P. Galetsi
    S. Kumar
    Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 319 : 965 - 1002
  • [32] Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda
    Katsaliaki, K.
    Galetsi, P.
    Kumar, S.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 319 (1) : 965 - 1002
  • [33] Harnessing interestingness in supply chain management research: an empirical investigation and research agenda
    El Baz, Jamal
    Jebli, Fedwa
    Gissel, Andreas
    Gourdin, Kent
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (10) : 3782 - 3806
  • [34] Supply chain management of color & appearance: Evolution vs. revolution
    Vasconcellos, JR
    AATCC REVIEW, 2001, 1 (06) : 14 - 18
  • [35] PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE SECTOR PERSPECTIVES ON SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
    Larson, Paul D.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 2009, 9 (02) : 222 - 247
  • [36] A systematic literature review on the service supply chain: research agenda and future research directions
    Choudhury, Tonmoy Toufic
    Paul, Sanjoy Kumar
    Rahman, Humyun Fuad
    Jia, Zhenguo
    Shukla, Nagesh
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2020, 31 (16) : 1363 - 1384
  • [37] Green supply chain game model and contract design: risk neutrality vs. risk aversion
    Cai, Jianhu
    Lin, Huazhen
    Hu, Xiaoqing
    Ping, Minyan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (34) : 51871 - 51891
  • [38] Modeling an Agile Supply Chain: Research Challenges and Future Directions
    Verma, Savita
    Jain, Vipul
    Majumdar, Abhijit
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2011), VOL 2, 2012, 131 : 277 - +
  • [39] Green supply chain game model and contract design: risk neutrality vs. risk aversion
    Jianhu Cai
    Huazhen Lin
    Xiaoqing Hu
    Minyan Ping
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 51871 - 51891
  • [40] A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda
    Fan, Yiyi
    Stevenson, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (03) : 205 - 230