Bayesian updating model of failure probability function and its solution

被引:1
|
作者
Guo, Yifan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu, Zhenzhou [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Xiaomin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feng, Kaixuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Aeronaut, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Aeronaut, State Key Lab Clean & Efficient Turbomachinery Pow, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Key Lab Aircraft Configurat Design, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Failure probability function; Bayesian updating; Kriging model; Importance sampling; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; INTERVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106778
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
When new observations are collected, the failure probability function (FPF) should be calibrated to match the new observations. However, there is a lack of FPF updating model and corresponding solution at present. Therefore, this paper devotes to the corresponding research. The main contribution of this paper includes two aspects. The first is constructing a Bayesian updating model of FPF, and the second is proposing two methods, i. e., combination sampling (CS) method and combination importance sampling (CIS) method, to solve the FPF updating model. In the constructed FPF updating model, the likelihood function, which approximately describes the probability of the observation error, is combined with the prior information to calibrate the prior FPF by Bayesian theory. And by sharing the sample information of the constructed CS density or the CIS density, the complete FPF can be updated through a single simulation run. Moreover, to enhance the efficiency of the CS and CIS, the adaptive Kriging model of performance function is nested in the CS and CIS methods. Five examples show that the two proposed methods need much less computational cost than the competitive methods under the similar accuracy of calibrating FPF, and the proposed CIS method is more efficient than the proposed CS method.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the Bayesian sensor placement for two-stage structural model updating and its validation
    Bansal, Sahil
    Cheung, Sai Hung
    Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 169
  • [42] Bayesian updating of a prediction model for sewer degradation
    Korving, H.
    van Noortwijk, J. M.
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2008, 5 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [43] ESTIMATION OF SCRAM FAILURE PROBABILITY IN A BAYESIAN FRAMEWORK
    FULLWOOD, RR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1976, 23 (JUN18): : 316 - 316
  • [44] BAYESIAN INFERENCE TO ESTIMATE RANDOM FAILURE PROBABILITY
    Sim, Hyun Su
    Kim, Yong Soo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2023, 30 (06): : 1525 - 1539
  • [45] Bayesian Model Updating and Its Limitations for Detecting Local Damage of an Existing Truss Bridge
    Mustafa, Samim
    Matsumoto, Yasunao
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2017, 22 (07)
  • [46] Bayesian model updating with consideration of modeling error
    Zhang, Erliang
    Feissel, Pierre
    Antoni, Jerome
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2010, 19 (1-3): : 255 - 266
  • [47] Bayesian updating of a unified soil compression model
    Jung, B. -C.
    Biscontin, G.
    Gardoni, P.
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2009, 3 (02) : 87 - 96
  • [48] SOFTWARE FAILURE PROBABILITY ASSESSMENT BY BAYESIAN INFERENCE
    Park, Gee-Yong
    Eom, Heung-Seop
    Jang, Seung Cheol
    Kang, Hyun Gook
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 183 (01) : 107 - 118
  • [49] An axiomatic model of non-Bayesian updating
    Epstein, LG
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2006, 73 (02): : 413 - 436
  • [50] On prediction error correlation in Bayesian model updating
    Simoen, Ellen
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    Lombaert, Geert
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2013, 332 (18) : 4136 - 4152