Patches in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Systematic Review

被引:3
|
作者
Saxena, Amulya K. [1 ]
Hayward, Romilly K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Paediat Surg, London, England
关键词
congenital diaphragmatic hernia; prosthetic materials; recurrence; patch repair; biomaterials; MINIMALLY INVASIVE REPAIR; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; PROSTHETIC PATCH; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR; MUSCLE FLAP; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; THORACOSCOPIC REPAIR; RECURRENCE RATE; DEFECT SIZE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000006256
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate current choices in practice and outcomes of biomaterials used in patch repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Background: Multiple biomaterials, both novel and combinations of pre-existing materials are employed in patch repair of large size CDHs. Methods: A literature search was performed across Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Publications that explicitly reported patch repair, material used, and recurrences following CDH repair were selected. Results: Sixty-three papers were included, presenting data on 4595 patients, of which 1803 (39.2%) were managed using 19 types of patches. Goretex (R) (GTX) (n=1106) was the most frequently employed patch followed by Dualmesh (R) (n=267), Surgisis (R) (n=156), Marlex (R)/GTX (R) (n=56), Tutoplast dura (R) (n=40), Dacron (R) (n=34), Dacron (R)/GTX (R) (n=32), Permacol (R) (n=24), Teflon (R) (n=24), Surgisis (R)/GTX (R) (n=15), Sauvage (R) Filamentous Fabric (n=13), Marlex (R) (n=9), Alloderm (R) (n=8), Silastic (R) (n=4), Collagen coated Vicryl (R) mesh (CCVM) (n=1), Mersilene (R) (n=1), and MatriStem (R) (n=1) Biomaterials were further subgrouped as: synthetic nonresorbable (SNOR) (n=1458), natural resorbable (NR) (n=241), combined natural and synthetic nonresorbable (NSNOR) (n=103), and combined natural and synthetic resorbable (NSR) (n=1). The overall recurrence rate for patch repair was 16.6% (n=299). For patch types with n>20, recurrence rate was lowest in GTX/Marlex (3.6%), followed by Teflon (4.2%), Dacron (5.6%), Dualmesh (12.4%), GTX (14.8%), Permacol (16.0%), Tutoplast Dura (17.5%), SIS/GTX (26.7%), SIS (34.6%), and Dacron/GTX (37.5%).When analyzed by biomaterial groups, recurrence was highest in NSR (100%), followed by NR (31.5%), NSNOR (17.5%), and SNOR the least (14.0%) Conclusion: In this cohort, over one-third of CDH were closed using patches. To date, 19 patch types/variations have been employed for CDH closure. GTX is the most popular, employed in over 60% of patients; however, excluding smaller cohorts (n<20), GTX/Marlex is associated with the lowest recurrence rate (3.6%). SNOR was the material type least associated with recurrence, while NSR experienced recurrence in every instance.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 234
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Ventricular function in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Prasad, Rameshwar
    Saha, Bijan
    Kumar, Amit
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 181 (03) : 1071 - 1083
  • [12] Congenital diaphragmatic hernia—does the presence of a hernia sac improve outcome? A systematic review of published studies
    Arimatias Raitio
    Adeline Salim
    Paul D. Losty
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2021, 180 : 333 - 337
  • [13] Bronchiolitis prevalence rates in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lewis, Leonie
    Losty, Paul
    Sinha, Ian
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58
  • [14] Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and summary of best-evidence practice strategies
    J W Logan
    H E Rice
    R N Goldberg
    C M Cotten
    Journal of Perinatology, 2007, 27 : 535 - 549
  • [15] Surgical approaches for neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Keita Terui
    Kouji Nagata
    Miharu Ito
    Masaya Yamoto
    Masayuki Shiraishi
    Tomoaki Taguchi
    Masahiro Hayakawa
    Hiroomi Okuyama
    Hideo Yoshida
    Kouji Masumoto
    Yutaka Kanamori
    Keiji Goishi
    Naoto Urushihara
    Motoyoshi Kawataki
    Noboru Inamura
    Osamu Kimura
    Tadaharu Okazaki
    Katsuaki Toyoshima
    Noriaki Usui
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2015, 31 : 891 - 897
  • [16] Neonatal Endosurgical Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lansdale, Nick
    Alam, Sabrina
    Losty, Paul D.
    Jesudason, Edwin C.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [17] Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and summary of best-evidence practice strategies
    Logan, J. W.
    Rice, H. E.
    Goldberg, R. N.
    Cotten, C. M.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (09) : 535 - 549
  • [18] Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review
    Jank, Marietta
    Boettcher, Michael
    Keijzer, Richard
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2024, 7 (03) : 1 - 11
  • [19] Surgical approaches for neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Terui, Keita
    Nagata, Kouji
    Ito, Miharu
    Yamoto, Masaya
    Shiraishi, Masayuki
    Taguchi, Tomoaki
    Hayakawa, Masahiro
    Okuyama, Hiroomi
    Yoshida, Hideo
    Masumoto, Kouji
    Kanamori, Yutaka
    Goishi, Keiji
    Urushihara, Naoto
    Kawataki, Motoyoshi
    Inamura, Noboru
    Kimura, Osamu
    Okazaki, Tadaharu
    Toyoshima, Katsuaki
    Usui, Noriaki
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 31 (10) : 891 - 897
  • [20] Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
    Wijnen, Rene
    Tibboel, Dick
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2012, 22 (05) : 343 - 343