The relationship of technological and organizational innovation with firm performance: Opening the black box of dynamic complementarities

被引:0
|
作者
Vahter, Priit [1 ]
Vadi, Maaja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Tartu, Estonia
关键词
Complementarities of innovation types; Sequential complementarity; Upward and downward dynamics in; complementarity bundle; Technological innovation; Organizational innovation; ATTENTION-BASED VIEW; PROPENSITY SCORE; PERSISTENCE; ADOPTION; PRODUCT; PATTERNS; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123516
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the dynamic nature of complementarities between technological and organizational innovation at firms. Using Spanish panel data of manufacturing firms (PITEC) over the period 2008-2016, it investigates how the formation and ending of the joint adoption of these two core types of innovation is associated with firm performance. We observe clear evidence that some sequential as well as simultaneous strategy switches towards combining technological and organizational novelties are associated with significant performance premia at firms. Our findings point out the crucial role of technological innovation in these complementarities. In the case of giving up the adoption of new elements of the complementarity bundle of innovation types, the critical disadvantage for the firm is related to dropping the adoption of technological innovation. Giving up adoption of new organizational innovation while keeping the adoption of new technological innovation appears to have no negative effect, on average, on firm performance. Our findings suggest significant coordination failures at firms attempting to introduce both core types of innovation in tandem. For many firms, the retention of the joint adoption of technological and organizational innovation over time is a costly and hard-to-maintain choice and not necessarily the one with the highest performance benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] OPENING THE BLACK-BOX OF INNOVATION
    AGHION, P
    TIROLE, J
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1994, 38 (3-4) : 701 - 710
  • [12] Firm size and dynamic technological innovation
    Stock, GN
    Greis, NP
    Fischer, WA
    TECHNOVATION, 2002, 22 (09) : 537 - 549
  • [13] Opening the “black box” of organizational coaching for implementation
    Kathryn Fleddermann
    Nora Jacobson
    Julie Horst
    Lynn M Madden
    Eric Haram
    Todd Molfenter
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [14] Opening the "black box" of organizational coaching for implementation
    Fleddermann, Kathryn
    Jacobson, Nora
    Horst, Julie
    Madden, Lynn M.
    Haram, Eric
    Molfenter, Todd
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [15] ORGANIZATIONAL PATH DEPENDENCE: OPENING THE BLACK BOX
    Sydow, Joerg
    Schreyoegg, Georg
    Koch, Jochen
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 34 (04): : 689 - 709
  • [16] The Moderating Role of Organizational Context on the Relationship Between Innovation and Firm Performance
    De Clercq, Dirk
    Thongpapanl, Narongsak
    Dimov, Dimo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2011, 58 (03) : 431 - 444
  • [17] RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OPEN INNOVATION, ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND FIRM'S INNOVATION PERFORMANCE
    He Yu-bing
    Chen Yi
    PROCEEDING OF 2012 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY (ISMOT'2012), 2012, : 473 - 477
  • [18] Dynamic Capabilities, Innovation and Organizational Learning: Interrelations and Impact on Firm Performance
    Giniuniene, Jurgita
    Jurksiene, Lolita
    20TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT 2015 (ICEM-2015), 2015, 213 : 985 - 991
  • [19] Technological innovation capabilities and Firm Performance
    Yam, Richard C.M.
    Lo, William
    Tang, Esther P.Y.
    Lau, Antonio K.W.
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2010, 66 : 1023 - 1031
  • [20] Organizational culture and innovation: exploring the "black box"
    Vargas-Halabi, Tomas
    Yague-Perales, Rosa Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2024, 33 (02) : 174 - 194