Is the green innovation under the pressure of new environmental protection law of PRC substantive green innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Bi, Qian [1 ]
Feng, Shi [2 ]
Qu, Tianli [1 ]
Ye, Peixi [1 ]
Liu, Zhiyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Econ, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
Heavy-polluting enterprises; New environmental protection law of PRC; pressure; Green innovation; Environmental information disclosure; Enterprise value; LEGITIMACY; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114227
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China's economy is developing rapidly, and the environmental pressure brought by it has attracted much attention. New amendment comes amid growing emphasis on "green hills and clear waters ". From the new perspective of whether the new Environmental Protection Law plays a practical role in the capital market, this paper divides green innovation behavior to study the impact of the new Environmental Protection Law (EPL) pressure on green innovation of heavily polluting enterprises. And it takes the change of environmental information through enterprise green innovation as a point of penetration to study that under the pressure of EPL, the green innovation of heavy pollution enterprises become substantive green innovation or instrumental green innovation. Based on the green innovation data from 2012 to 2016, this paper uses multiple regression model and generalized least square method to analyze the data, and finds that the green innovation of heavy polluting enterprises increased significantly under the pressure of the new EPL; after the green innovation, the environmental information disclosure of these enterprises did not significantly increase, indicating that the green innovation under the pressure of the EPL is not substantive green innovation, it is an instrumental green innovation in response to the law.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental protection tax, management efficiency, and enterprise green technology innovation
    Zhou, Yang
    Su, Qian
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 75
  • [32] Environmental protection tax, corporate ESG performance, and green technological innovation
    Li, Jing
    Li, Shiyu
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [33] Environmental Protection Tax and Green Innovation: The Mediating Role of Digitalization and ESG
    Cao, Guixiang
    She, Jinghuai
    Cao, Chengzi
    Cao, Qiuxiang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [34] Greening through courts:Environmental law enforcement and corporate green innovation
    Lan, Minghui
    Zhang, Guangli
    Yan, Wei
    Qi, Fen
    Qin, Lihua
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 83 : 223 - 242
  • [35] ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND GREEN INNOVATION IN BUSINESSES
    Miklencicova, Renata
    Capkovicova, Bronislava
    MARKETING IDENTITY: EXPLOSION OF INNOVATIONS, 2014, : 482 - 493
  • [36] The role of high-tech certification in enterprise green innovation: from the perspectives of substantive innovation and strategic innovation
    Liang, Zhiqiang
    Shen, Yao
    Yang, Kunyu
    Kuang, Jinsong
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2025, 13
  • [37] The impact of the new environmental protection law on eco-innovation: evidence from green patent data of Chinese listed companies
    Wugan Cai
    Fengru Xu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 10047 - 10062
  • [38] The impact of the new environmental protection law on eco-innovation: evidence from green patent data of Chinese listed companies
    Cai, Wugan
    Xu, Fengru
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (07) : 10047 - 10062
  • [39] Escaping regulation or embracing innovation? Substantive green Innovation's role in moderating environmental policy and outward foreign direct investment
    Zhao, Jinjing
    Li, Ai
    Roh, Taewoo
    Su, Miao
    ENERGY, 2025, 316
  • [40] Shaping sustainable development: External environmental pressure, exploratory green learning, and radical green innovation
    Cui, Rixiao
    Wang, Juanru
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (03) : 481 - 495