Wettability modification effects on relative permeability end-points: Comparative analysis of surfactant agents for enhanced oil recovery

被引:2
|
作者
Hosseini, Erfan [1 ]
Hosseini, Negar [2 ]
Sarmadivaleh, Mohammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Iranian Oil Co NIOC, Explorat Directorate, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ IAU, Dept Petr Engn, Ilam, Iran
[3] Curtin Univ, WA Sch Mines Minerals Energy & Chem Engn, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Wettability alteration; Relative permeability; Core flooding; Tx-10; 0; Cedar; Contact angle; DISPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ptlrs.2023.09.002
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This research examines the impact of wettability alteration on the end points of relative permeability, a crucial property of fluids and porous media that influences the displacement processes of immiscible fluids through such media. The estimation of the mobility ratio for oil recovery relies on these end points, which are influenced by connate water saturation and residual oil saturation. To investigate this relationship, carbonate rock is generally subjected to wettability alteration using surfactant agents, and core flooding is employed to determine the relative permeability before and after the alteration. The wettability of the rock is commonly assessed through contact angle measurements. Two surfactants, TritonX-10 0 (Tx -100) and Cedar, were tested in reducing the wettability of the porous media for oil. The contact angle measurements revealed that Tx -10 0 was more effective for this purpose than Cedar. Furthermore, the relative permeability tests indicated that both surfactants decreased residual oil saturation, but Tx -10 0 also improved system pressure. In contrast, Cedar reduced residual oil saturation but increased system pressure, possibly because of its high viscosity. The results also demonstrate that injecting Tx -10 0 leads to a 14% increase in ultimate oil recovery compared with water injection, while Cedar injection increased the recovery factor by 5%. This difference may be attributed to the incomplete coverage of the pore wall by Cedar or its weaker chemical structure than Tx -100. Notably, in carbonate cores, neither non-ionic surfactant enhanced oil recovery. (c) 2023 The Authors. Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communication Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 218
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [11] A Comparative Study of Surfactant Solutions Used for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Formations: Experimental Evaluation and Numerical Analysis
    Chen, Weidong
    Geng, Xiangfei
    Ding, Bin
    Liu, Weidong
    Jiang, Ke
    Xu, Qinglong
    Guan, Baoshan
    Peng, Lin
    Peng, Huan
    MOLECULES, 2024, 29 (14):
  • [12] Modification Wettability and Interfacial Tension of Heavy Crude Oil by Green Bio-surfactant Based on Bacillus licheniformis and Rhodococcus erythropolis Strains under Reservoir Conditions: Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Mahmoud, Tahany
    Samak, Nadia A.
    Abdelhamid, M. M.
    Aboulrous, A. A.
    Xing, Jianmin
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2021, 35 (02) : 1648 - 1663
  • [13] Enhanced oil recovery and carbon sequestration in low-permeability reservoirs: Comparative analysis of CO2 and oil-based CO2 foam
    Wang, Zhoujie
    Li, Songyan
    Li, Minghe
    Husein, Maen M.
    FUEL, 2025, 381
  • [14] Double-Chain Single-Head modification of extracted saponin from Anabasis Setifera plant and its effects on chemical enhanced oil recovery process by surfactant-alkali slug injection into carbonate oil reservoirs
    Nowrouzi, Iman
    Mohammadi, Amir H.
    Manshad, Abbas Khaksar
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 201