Refining research on access to gynecologic cancer care: The DIMeS framework

被引:0
|
作者
Shalowitz, David I. [1 ,2 ]
Rajczi, Alex [3 ]
机构
[1] West Michigan Canc Ctr, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[2] Western Michigan Univ, Homer Stryker MD Sch Med, Dept Med Eth Humanities & Law, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[3] Claremont McKenna Coll, Dept Philosophy, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
Gynecologic cancers; Bioethics; Access to care; Health equity; Cancer care delivery research; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Despite its importance, there is no consensus de finition of access to care, and several fundamental philosophical questions about access remain unanswered. Lack of clarity impedes interventional research designed to develop and test methods of correcting barriers to access. To help remedy this problem, we propose a conceptual framework to help guide empirical research about access to gynecologic cancer care. Methods. Relevant philosophical and empirical literature was reviewed and analyzed to highlight key elements needed to re fine research on access to care. Results. The DIMeS framework involves 1) choice and justi fication of a De finition of access to cancer care that will guide research; 2) Identi fication of essential gynecologic cancer care services for which access disparities are ethically unacceptable; 3) quantitative MEasurement of speci fic parameters that affect access to care; and 4) Selection of a target threshold on measured parameters above which access is acceptable. Conclusions. The DIMeS framework provides clarity and reproducibility for investigators seeking to develop and test interventions to improve cancer health equity. This framework should be considered for use in research on access to gynecologic cancer care. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 161
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Supportive care needs of women with gynecologic cancer
    Steele, Rose
    Fitch, Margaret I.
    CANCER NURSING, 2008, 31 (04) : 284 - 291
  • [32] Palliative and hospice care in gynecologic cancer: A review
    Lopez-Acevedo, Micael
    Lowery, William J.
    Lowery, Ashlei W.
    Lee, Paula S.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (01) : 215 - 221
  • [33] Disparities in prior authorization for gynecologic cancer care
    Smith, Anna Jo
    Mulugeta-Gordon, Lakeisha
    Pena, Daniella
    Kanter, Genevieve
    Bekelman, Justin
    Haggerty, Ashley
    Ko, Emily
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 : S85 - S85
  • [34] Availability of gynecologic oncologists for ovarian cancer care
    Cooney, D.
    Spruelll, B.
    Rim, S.
    Foster, S.
    Lawverel, S.
    Richardson, L.
    Thomas, C.
    Stewart, S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : S35 - S35
  • [35] Centralized, Specialist Care for Gynecologic Cancer Patients
    Christie, Janice
    CANCER NURSING, 2016, 39 (01) : 82 - 83
  • [36] Using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and levels of evidence to prioritize research focus in gynecologic cancer care
    Spencer, R.
    Rice, L. W.
    Uppal, S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 : 35 - 35
  • [37] Gynecologic Care of Black Breast Cancer Survivors
    Pleasant, Versha
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 16 (01) : 84 - 97
  • [38] ADVANCE CARE PLANNING FOR OUTPATIENT WITH GYNECOLOGIC CANCER
    Aihara, Satomi
    Kamishita, Yu
    Hashiguchi, Mariko
    Hayashi, Chizuru
    Ishimaru, Hiromi
    Murao, Chiyuki
    Ookubo, Rumiko
    Shirahama, Izumi
    Nakao, Yoshifumi
    Yokoyama, Masatoshi
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25
  • [39] Gynecologic cancer patients' awareness of palliative care
    Hicks-Courant, K.
    Graul, A.
    Ko, E. M.
    Giuntoli, R. L., II
    Cory, L.
    Martin, L. P.
    Morgan, M. A.
    Haggerty, A. F.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 313 - 314
  • [40] Gynecologic Care of Black Breast Cancer Survivors
    Versha Pleasant
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2024, 16 : 84 - 97