Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of an immunochromatographic test for Chlamydia trachomatis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Shu-Lian [2 ]
Lin, Hui-Ling [2 ]
Mi, Hong-Fei [3 ]
Meng, Qing-Qi [4 ]
Yan, Ya [4 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Luo [1 ,6 ]
Gu, Wei-Ming [5 ,7 ]
Xiao, Yao [1 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Hosp Infect Management, Sch Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Huli Dist Matern & Child Care Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Xiamen Branch, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Ctr Clin Lab, Sch Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Skin Dis Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] 201-209 Hubinnan Rd, Xiamen 361004, Peoples R China
[7] 238 Wuyi Rd, Shanghai 200050, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chlamydia trachomatis; Immunochromatographic test; Diagnostic performance; Clinical application; Quality control; SYPHILIS; POINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00412
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different brands of immunochromatographic test (ICT) reagents for Chlamydia trachomatis using homogenized samples to provide a reference for reagent quality control. Methods: Eight commercially available ICT reagents were evaluated, of which three used the latex method and five used the colloidal gold method. Analytical performance evaluation using a pure culture broth of C. trachomatis, as well as clinical application validation using cervical epithelial cell samples acquired from the research subjects, were conducted. The concentration of C. trachomatis was quantified using a nucleic acid amplification test. Results: The limit of detection (LOD) of different ICT reagents in the analytical performance evaluation varied from 9.5 x 103 to 1 x 105 IFU/mL, and only one reagent met the LOD specified in the manufacturer's instructions. Likewise, only one reagent in the clinical application validation achieved the analytical LOD, four reagents were 2.1-4.2-fold of the analytical LODs, and three reagents failed to detect positive results in clinical samples. Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of different methods and different brands of ICT reagents in clinical practice was different from the manufacturer's instructions and the results of laboratory evaluation. The diagnostic performance of reagents should be evaluated before they are actually used in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a field test for antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis during trachoma surveillance in Nepal
    Sun, Michelle J.
    Zambrano, Andrea I.
    Dize, Laura
    Munoz, Beatriz
    Gwyn, Sarah
    Mishra, Sailesh
    Martin, Diana L.
    Sharma, Shekhar
    West, Sheila K.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2017, 88 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [32] Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a ligase chain reaction test kit for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis
    Miyashita, N
    Matsumoto, A
    Niki, Y
    Matsushima, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (06) : 515 - 517
  • [33] Diagnostic Performance of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Test Kit for Detecting Canine Parvovirus Infection
    Shima, Felix K.
    Gberindyer, Fidelis A.
    Tion, Matthew T.
    Fagbohun, Olusegun A.
    Omobowale, Temidayo O.
    Nottidge, Helen O.
    TOPICS IN COMPANION ANIMAL MEDICINE, 2021, 45
  • [34] EVALUATION OF SENSITIVITY OF 10 DIAGNOSTIC ASSAYS FOR CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS BY USE OF A SIMPLE LABORATORY PROCEDURE
    THOMAS, BJ
    MACLEOD, EJ
    TAYLORROBINSON, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (10) : 912 - 914
  • [35] SIMPLIFIED SEROLOGICAL TEST FOR ANTIBODIES TO CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS
    THOMAS, BJ
    REEVE, P
    ORIEL, JD
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1976, 4 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [36] Reproducibility problems with the AMPLICOR PCR Chlamydia trachomatis test
    Peterson, EM
    Darrow, V
    Blanding, J
    Aarnaes, S
    delaMaza, LM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (04) : 957 - 959
  • [37] EVALUATION OF SENSITIVITY OF 10 DIAGNOSTIC ASSAYS FOR CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS BY USE OF A SIMPLE LABORATORY PROCEDURE
    THOMAS, BJ
    MACLEOD, EJ
    TAYLORROBINSON, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (05) : 408 - 410
  • [38] Evaluation of a lightcycler confirmatory assay for Chlamydia trachomatis
    Bennett, L
    Landt, O
    Jones, M
    Bromhead, C
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2004, 6 (02): : 151 - 151
  • [39] CHLAMYDIAZYME TEST FOR RAPID DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS
    SHARMA, M
    NAYAK, N
    MALHOTRA, S
    KUMAR, B
    HEMAL, A
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH SECTION A-INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1989, 89 : 87 - 91
  • [40] Chlamydia trachomatis in a thin-prep Papanicolaou test
    Weisenberg, E
    Froula, E
    Tan, B
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2001, 125 (07) : 981 - 981