Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of an immunochromatographic test for Chlamydia trachomatis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Shu-Lian [2 ]
Lin, Hui-Ling [2 ]
Mi, Hong-Fei [3 ]
Meng, Qing-Qi [4 ]
Yan, Ya [4 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Luo [1 ,6 ]
Gu, Wei-Ming [5 ,7 ]
Xiao, Yao [1 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Hosp Infect Management, Sch Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Huli Dist Matern & Child Care Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Xiamen Branch, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Ctr Clin Lab, Sch Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Skin Dis Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] 201-209 Hubinnan Rd, Xiamen 361004, Peoples R China
[7] 238 Wuyi Rd, Shanghai 200050, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chlamydia trachomatis; Immunochromatographic test; Diagnostic performance; Clinical application; Quality control; SYPHILIS; POINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00412
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different brands of immunochromatographic test (ICT) reagents for Chlamydia trachomatis using homogenized samples to provide a reference for reagent quality control. Methods: Eight commercially available ICT reagents were evaluated, of which three used the latex method and five used the colloidal gold method. Analytical performance evaluation using a pure culture broth of C. trachomatis, as well as clinical application validation using cervical epithelial cell samples acquired from the research subjects, were conducted. The concentration of C. trachomatis was quantified using a nucleic acid amplification test. Results: The limit of detection (LOD) of different ICT reagents in the analytical performance evaluation varied from 9.5 x 103 to 1 x 105 IFU/mL, and only one reagent met the LOD specified in the manufacturer's instructions. Likewise, only one reagent in the clinical application validation achieved the analytical LOD, four reagents were 2.1-4.2-fold of the analytical LODs, and three reagents failed to detect positive results in clinical samples. Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of different methods and different brands of ICT reagents in clinical practice was different from the manufacturer's instructions and the results of laboratory evaluation. The diagnostic performance of reagents should be evaluated before they are actually used in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reproducibility and performance of the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis test
    Rosenstraus, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (12) : 3361 - 3362
  • [2] Reproducibility and performance of the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis test - Reply
    Peterson, ER
    delaMaza, LM
    Blanding, J
    Aarnaes, SL
    Darrow, V
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (12) : 3362 - 3362
  • [3] Evaluation of the Vidas Chlamydia test to detect and verify Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens
    Schachter, J
    Jones, RB
    Butler, RC
    Rice, B
    Brooks, D
    VanderPol, B
    Gray, M
    Moncada, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (08) : 2102 - 2106
  • [4] A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ATLAS GENETICS LTD IO® SYSTEM: A NOVEL AND RAPID POINT-OF-CARE IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS
    Cousins, Emma
    Harding-Esch, Emma
    Chow, Christine S-L
    Phillips, Laura T.
    Hall, Cathrine
    Cooper, Nick
    Fuller, Sebastian S.
    Pearce, David
    Green, Marc
    Bannister, Stephanie
    Clarkson, John
    Dunbar, Kevin
    Lowndes, Cathy M.
    Sadiq, STariq
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2017, 93 : A22 - A23
  • [5] Performance evaluation of the PelvoCheck CT/NG test kit for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
    Meyer, Thomas
    Kios, Christian
    Kofler, Regina
    Kilic, Annett
    Haenel, Kristina
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (01):
  • [6] PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF NEW HELICOBACTER PYLORI STOOL ANTIGEN IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC TEST
    Kate, Vikram
    Mohsina, Subair
    Sahoo, Ashok K.
    Cherian, Anchu A.
    Madhuvanti, K.
    Mandal, Jharna
    Sureshkumar, Sathasivam
    Mahalakshmy, Thulasingam
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S507 - S507
  • [7] Evaluation of a new commercial microimmunofluorescence test for detection of antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Chlamydia psittaci
    Freidank, HM
    Vogele, H
    Eckert, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 16 (09) : 685 - 688
  • [8] Cervical specimen order and performance measures of Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing
    Ghanem, KG
    Johnson, RE
    Koumans, EH
    Marrazzo, JM
    Markowitz, LE
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (10) : 5295 - 5297
  • [9] QUANTIFICATION OF THE RISK OF PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE FOLLOWING A CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS TEST BY DIAGNOSTIC TEST TYPE
    Davies, Bethan
    Turner, Katy Me
    Andersen, Berit
    Westh, Henrik
    Ward, Helen
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2017, 93 : A102 - A102
  • [10] PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF AN ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS
    HAMBLING, MH
    KURTZ, JB
    LANCET, 1985, 1 (8419): : 53 - 53