Analysis of Air Quality and Health Co-Benefits under Low Carbon Pathway in Taiwan

被引:0
|
作者
Lai, Hsin-Chih [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Shih-Ming [4 ]
Li, Li-Ling [4 ]
Lin, Wen-Yinn [3 ]
Hsiao, Min-Chuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Dept Green Energy & Environm Resources, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Environm Res & Informat Ctr, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Inst Environm Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Ind Technol Res Inst, Green Energy & Environm Res Labs, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Low -carbon path; Air quality; Health benefit; LONG-TERM EXPOSURE; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTION; MORTALITY; PM2.5; POLICIES; CHINA;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.230268
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change has been proven to have adverse effects on human health and ecosystems, especially, the continuous increase in greenhouse gas emissions that are able to drive extreme weather events around the world. Besides greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution also have a mutual relationship. The PM2.5 concentration has been decreasing year by year, but the ozone concentration has been slowly increasing, indicating that ozone issues will be a focus of concern in Taiwan in the future. Therefore, this study focuses on air pollution and its health impacts on power generation on climate change scenario. The air quality in 2050 was estimated in this study by using the Long-range Energy Alternatives Planning System (LEAP) model and the Weather Research and Forecasting-Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling (WRF-CMAQ) system. The future power plants' emissions were calculated by historical inventory and the power generation from 2010 to 2016. The simulation results revealed the low-carbon path in the electricity industry can lead to some improvements in air quality and also the associated health benefits. This study demonstrates that implementing carbon reduction strategies in the power sector would lead to a slight increase in ozone concentration. In detail, the annual PM2.5 concentrations would decrease by 0.7 mu g m-3 (4%) from BAU (Business As Usual) scenario, while the O3 concentrations would have an increase of 0.3 ppb (1%). The reduction of air pollution can prevent 1012 (374- 2463) deaths, saving around 48.9 billion NTD in health monetary costs. In the short term, it is projected that there may be a decrease of 45 patients hospitalized due to respiratory diseases and 53 patients hospitalized due to cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, the reductions in the power sector are expected to have more significant impacts in densely populated areas due to their combination of industrial and residential zones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Climate co-benefits of air quality and clean energy policy in India
    Kushal Tibrewal
    Chandra Venkataraman
    Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4 : 305 - 313
  • [42] Spatial disparities and sources analysis of co-benefits between air pollution and carbon reduction in China
    Xie, Pin
    Duan, Zhicheng
    Wei, Tie
    Pan, Huaihong
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 354
  • [43] Co-benefits as a rationale and co-benefits as a factor for urban climate action: linking air quality and emission reductions in Moscow, Paris, and Montreal
    Roggero, Matteo
    Gotgelf, Anastasiia
    Eisenack, Klaus
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2023, 176 (12)
  • [44] Blue carbon for climate and co-benefits
    Sarah E. Lester
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7 : 967 - 968
  • [45] Co-benefits of a carbon tax in Nepal
    Shree Raj Shakya
    S. Kumar
    Ram M. Shrestha
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2012, 17 : 77 - 101
  • [46] Co-benefits as a rationale and co-benefits as a factor for urban climate action: linking air quality and emission reductions in Moscow, Paris, and Montreal
    Matteo Roggero
    Anastasiia Gotgelf
    Klaus Eisenack
    Climatic Change, 2023, 176
  • [47] Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges
    Toon Vandyck
    Kimon Keramidas
    Alban Kitous
    Joseph V. Spadaro
    Rita Van Dingenen
    Mike Holland
    Bert Saveyn
    Nature Communications, 9
  • [48] Co-benefits of a carbon tax in Nepal
    Shakya, Shree Raj
    Kumar, S.
    Shrestha, Ram M.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2012, 17 (01) : 77 - 101
  • [49] The co-benefits of carbon management on country
    Green, Donna
    Minchin, Liz
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 2 (09) : 641 - 643
  • [50] Beyond cost and carbon: The multidimensional co-benefits of low carbon transitions in Europe
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Martiskainen, Mari
    Hook, Andrew
    Baker, Lucy
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 169