COMPREHENSIVE VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION OF A CFD ANALYSIS

被引:0
|
作者
Amaral, Tiago [1 ]
Rentschler, Manuel [2 ]
Vaz, Guilherme [2 ,3 ]
Baltazar, Joao [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] blueOASIS, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Southampton, Dept Civil Maritime & Environm Engn, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Inst Super Tecn, Dept Mech Engn, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Wave Energy Converter; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Decay Test; Cylinder; ReFRESCO; Hydrodynamic Damping;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Wave energy converters (WECs) are designed to operate near the resonance region, being excited at or close to its natural frequencies. Therefore, they are strongly affected by the interaction with waves, motion and mooring restraints. Floating WECs, such as point absorbers, present small dimensions in relation to the wave length, being typically subjected to large amplitude motions. An oscillating floating vertical cylinder is a simple representative geometry of WECs and component of many different floating structures. Over the past years it has been addressed in multiple studies revealing several difficulties. The pitch and heave free decay responses of a floating vertical cylinder will be studied throughout this paper. The present case was based on an experiment and subject of different CFD validation studies. Both have found significant discrepancies regarding the damping and natural period of the system, specially for the pitch motion. Throughout this work a rigorous verification study was performed, with special focus on the iterative convergence and discretisation errors relative to the hydrodynamic damping coefficients. Moreover, the main phenomena contributing to the hydrodynamic damping of the system were identified. Furthermore, the results were further compared with an experimental investigation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The uncertainty and truth-value assessment in the verification and validation of CFD
    Zhang, Han-Xin
    Zha, Jun
    Kongqi Donglixue Xuebao/Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2010, 28 (01): : 39 - 45
  • [22] A procedure for verification, validation, and reporting of indoor environment CFD analyses
    Chen, QY
    Srebric, J
    HVAC&R RESEARCH, 2002, 8 (02): : 201 - 216
  • [23] CFD VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION EXERCISE: TURBULENT MIXING OF STRATIFIED LAYER
    Thompson, Jason
    Boyd, Christopher
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION SYMPOSIUM, VVS2020, 2020,
  • [24] Thorough Verification and Validation of CFD Simulation for FPSO Roll Damping
    Lee, Donghwan
    Huang, Zhenjia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2019, VOL 1, 2019,
  • [25] An Extended Verification and Validation Study of CFD Simulations for Planing Hulls
    De Luca, Fabio
    Mancini, Simone
    Miranda, Salvatore
    Pensa, Claudio
    JOURNAL OF SHIP RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (02): : 101 - 118
  • [26] A Comprehensive Approach to On-board Autonomy Verification and Validation
    Bozzano, Marco
    Cimatti, Alessandro
    Roveri, Marco
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 12 (04)
  • [27] A COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK FOR KNOWLEDGE-BASE VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION
    FRENCH, SW
    HAMILTON, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 1994, 9 (09) : 809 - 837
  • [28] PART II: VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION OF CFD ANALYSIS FOR NASA SDT TRANSONIC FAN STAGE COUPLED WITH NACELLE
    Lee, Daryl Y.
    Vega, Gregorio Robles
    Ni, Michael
    Ni, Ron-Ho
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME TURBO EXPO 2023: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, GT2023, VOL 13A, 2023,
  • [29] PART I: VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION OF CFD ANALYSIS FOR NASA SDT TRANSONIC FAN STAGE TEST RIG
    Vega, Gregorio Robles
    Lee, Daryl Y.
    Ni, Michael
    Ni, Ron-Ho
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME TURBO EXPO 2023: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, GT2023, VOL 13A, 2023,
  • [30] CFD model for a 3-D inhaling mannequin: Verification and validation
    Anthony, TR
    Flynn, MR
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2006, 50 (02): : 157 - 173