Reprint of "Decision-making in child protective services: Influences at multiple levels of the social ecology

被引:25
|
作者
Font, Sarah A. [1 ]
Maguire-Jack, Kathryn [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Populat Res Ctr, Austin, TX 78704 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Child maltreatment; Foster care; Substantiation; Decision-making; Ecological; HLM; FOSTER-CARE PLACEMENT; ABORIGINAL CHILDREN; CANADIAN INCIDENCE; ALCOHOL OUTLETS; NEGLECT PART; ABUSE; MALTREATMENT; RISK; SUBSTANTIATION; NEIGHBORHOODS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.011
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Decision-making in the child protection system is influenced by multiple factors; agency and geographic contexts, caseworker attributes, and families' unique circumstances all likely play a role. In this study, we use the second cohort of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being to explore how these factors are associated with two key case decisions substantiation and removal to out-of-home care. Analyses are conducted using weighted hierarchical linear models. We find that substantiation is strongly influenced by agency factors, particularly constraints on service accessibility. Substantiation is less likely when agencies can provide services to unsubstantiated cases and when collaboration with other social institutions is high. This supports the concept that substantiation may be a gateway to services in some communities. Agency factors contributed less to the probability of removal among substantiated cases, though time resources and constraints on decision-making had some influence. For both substantiation and removal risks, county, caseworker, and child characteristics were less influential than agency characteristics and family risk factors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 62
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A brain network supporting social influences in human decision-making
    Zhang, Lei
    Glaescher, Jan
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2020, 6 (34):
  • [22] Decision-making and adult protective services workers: Identifying critical factors
    Bergeron, LR
    JOURNAL OF ELDER ABUSE & NEGLECT, 1999, 10 (3-4) : 87 - 113
  • [23] The influence of differential response on decision-making in child protective service agencies
    Janczewski, Colleen E.
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2015, 39 : 50 - 60
  • [24] Group decision-making theories for child and family social work
    Alfandari, Ravit
    Taylor, Brian J.
    Enosh, Guy
    Killick, Campbell
    McCafferty, Paul
    Mullineux, Judith
    Przeperski, Jaroslaw
    Rolver, Michael
    Whittaker, Andrew
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2023, 26 (02) : 204 - 217
  • [25] Multiple levels of social influence on adolescent sexual and reproductive health decision-making and behaviors in Ghana
    Challa, Sneha
    Manu, Abubakar
    Morhe, Emmanuel
    Dalton, Vanessa K.
    Loll, Dana
    Dozier, Jessica
    Zochowski, Melissa K.
    Boakye, Andrew
    Adanu, Richard
    Hall, Kelli Stidham
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2018, 58 (04) : 434 - 450
  • [26] Social rejection influences prosocial sharing decision-making in inequality contexts
    Killian, Haley J.
    Lim, Seung-Lark
    Bruce, Jared M.
    Ha, Oh-Ryeong
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (08) : 6372 - 6385
  • [27] Social standing and quality labels - what influences parental decision-making?
    Faupel, Ulya
    Haselhoff, Vanessa
    Ziesak, Miriam
    Holzmueller, Hartmut H.
    YOUNG CONSUMERS, 2014, 15 (01): : 68 - 83
  • [28] Geophysical and Social Influences on Evacuation Decision-Making: The Case of Hurricane Irma
    Ersing, Robin L.
    Pearce, Christianne
    Collins, Jennifer
    Saunders, Michelle E.
    Polen, Amy
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (08)
  • [29] Social rejection influences prosocial sharing decision-making in inequality contexts
    Haley J. Killian
    Seung-Lark Lim
    Jared M. Bruce
    Oh-Ryeong Ha
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 6372 - 6385
  • [30] Influences on multidisciplinary team decision-making
    Lanceley, A.
    Savage, J.
    Menon, U.
    Jacobs, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (02) : 215 - 222