A deep learning anthropomorphic model observer for a detection task in PET

被引:1
|
作者
Shao, Muhan [1 ]
Byrd, Darrin W. [2 ]
Mitra, Jhimli [1 ]
Behnia, Fatemeh [2 ]
Lee, Jean H. [2 ]
Iravani, Amir [2 ]
Sadic, Murat [2 ]
Chen, Delphine L. [2 ]
Wollenweber, Scott D. [3 ]
Abbey, Craig K. [4 ]
Kinahan, Paul E. [2 ]
Ahn, Sangtae [1 ]
机构
[1] GE HealthCare Technol & Innovat Ctr, 1 Res Circle,K1-5C8A, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA USA
[3] GE HealthCare, Waukesha, WI USA
[4] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
channelized Hotelling observer (CHO); convolutional neural network (CNN); deep learning; detection; model observer; positron emission tomography (PET); transformer; two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC); IDEAL-OBSERVER; HOTELLING OBSERVER; SIGNAL-DETECTION; RECONSTRUCTION; PERFORMANCE; NOISE;
D O I
10.1002/mp.17303
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundLesion detection is one of the most important clinical tasks in positron emission tomography (PET) for oncology. An anthropomorphic model observer (MO) designed to replicate human observers (HOs) in a detection task is an important tool for assessing task-based image quality. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) has been the most popular anthropomorphic MO. Recently, deep learning MOs (DLMOs), mostly based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been investigated for various imaging modalities. However, there have been few studies on DLMOs for PET.PurposeThe goal of the study is to investigate whether DLMOs can predict HOs better than conventional MOs such as CHO in a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) detection task using PET images with real anatomical variability.MethodsTwo types of DLMOs were implemented: (1) CNN DLMO, and (2) CNN-SwinT DLMO that combines CNN and Swin Transformer (SwinT) encoders. Lesion-absent PET images were reconstructed from clinical data, and lesion-present images were reconstructed with adding simulated lesion sinogram data. Lesion-present and lesion-absent PET image pairs were labeled by eight HOs consisting of four radiologists and four image scientists in a 2AFC detection task. In total, 2268 pairs of lesion-present and lesion-absent images were used for training, 324 pairs for validation, and 324 pairs for test. CNN DLMO, CNN-SwinT DLMO, CHO with internal noise, and non-prewhitening matched filter (NPWMF) were compared in the same train-test paradigm. For comparison, six quantitative metrics including prediction accuracy, mean squared errors (MSEs) and correlation coefficients, which measure how well a MO predicts HOs, were calculated in a 9-fold cross-validation experiment.ResultsIn terms of the accuracy and MSE metrics, CNN DLMO and CNN-SwinT DLMO showed better performance than CHO and NPWMF, and CNN-SwinT DLMO showed the best performance among the MOs evaluated.ConclusionsDLMO can predict HOs more accurately than conventional MOs such as CHO in PET lesion detection. Combining SwinT and CNN encoders can improve the DLMO prediction performance compared to using CNN only.
引用
收藏
页码:7093 / 7107
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ACTOR AND OBSERVER PERCEPTIONS OF LEARNING OF A TASK
    MILLER, AG
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 11 (02) : 95 - 111
  • [22] Analysis on dendritic deep learning model for AMR task
    Yin, Peng
    Zhu, Sanli
    Yu, Yang
    Wang, Ziqian
    Chen, Zhuangzhi
    CYBERSECURITY, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [23] Comparison of Deep Learning and Human Observer Performance for Lesion Detection and Characterization
    De Man, Ruben
    Gang, Grace J.
    Li, Xin
    Wang, Ge
    15TH INTERNATIONAL MEETING ON FULLY THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION IN RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 11072
  • [24] Deep Learning Model for Object Detection
    Hristeva, T.
    Marinova, M.
    Lazarov, V.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLICATION OF MATHEMATICS IN ENGINEERING AND ECONOMICS (AMEE'19), 2019, 2172
  • [25] Deep Generalized Learning Model for PET Image Reconstruction
    Zhang, Qiyang
    Hu, Yingying
    Zhao, Yumo
    Cheng, Jing
    Fan, Wei
    Hu, Debin
    Shi, Fuxiao
    Cao, Shuangliang
    Zhou, Yun
    Yang, Yongfeng
    Liu, Xin
    Zheng, Hairong
    Liang, Dong
    Hu, Zhanli
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 43 (01) : 122 - 134
  • [26] Deep Packet: Deep Learning Model for Intrusion Detection
    Kiet Nguyen Tuan
    Nguyen Duc Thai
    INTELLIGENCE OF THINGS: TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, ICIT 2024, VOL 2, 2025, 230 : 339 - 348
  • [27] Facial Landmark Detection by Deep Multi-task Learning
    Zhang, Zhanpeng
    Luo, Ping
    Loy, Chen Change
    Tang, Xiaoou
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2014, PT VI, 2014, 8694 : 94 - 108
  • [28] Deep Multi-task Learning for Interpretable Glaucoma Detection
    Mojab, Nooshin
    Noroozi, Vahid
    Yu, Philip S.
    Hallak, Joelle A.
    2019 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION FOR DATA SCIENCE (IRI 2019), 2019, : 167 - 174
  • [29] A Human-Trained Numerical Observer Model for PET Lesion Detection Tasks
    Schaefferkoetter, Josh
    Townsend, David
    2015 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2015,
  • [30] BEST IN PHYSICS (IMAGING): Validation of a Deep-Learning Model Observer in a Realistic Lung-Nodule Detection Task with Convolutional Neural Network-Based CT Denoising
    Gong, H.
    Huber, N.
    Koo, C.
    Johnson, T.
    Inuoe, A.
    Marsh, J.
    Thorne, J.
    Leng, S.
    Fletcher, J.
    McCollough, C.
    Yu, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)