A deep learning anthropomorphic model observer for a detection task in PET

被引:1
|
作者
Shao, Muhan [1 ]
Byrd, Darrin W. [2 ]
Mitra, Jhimli [1 ]
Behnia, Fatemeh [2 ]
Lee, Jean H. [2 ]
Iravani, Amir [2 ]
Sadic, Murat [2 ]
Chen, Delphine L. [2 ]
Wollenweber, Scott D. [3 ]
Abbey, Craig K. [4 ]
Kinahan, Paul E. [2 ]
Ahn, Sangtae [1 ]
机构
[1] GE HealthCare Technol & Innovat Ctr, 1 Res Circle,K1-5C8A, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA USA
[3] GE HealthCare, Waukesha, WI USA
[4] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
channelized Hotelling observer (CHO); convolutional neural network (CNN); deep learning; detection; model observer; positron emission tomography (PET); transformer; two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC); IDEAL-OBSERVER; HOTELLING OBSERVER; SIGNAL-DETECTION; RECONSTRUCTION; PERFORMANCE; NOISE;
D O I
10.1002/mp.17303
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundLesion detection is one of the most important clinical tasks in positron emission tomography (PET) for oncology. An anthropomorphic model observer (MO) designed to replicate human observers (HOs) in a detection task is an important tool for assessing task-based image quality. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) has been the most popular anthropomorphic MO. Recently, deep learning MOs (DLMOs), mostly based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been investigated for various imaging modalities. However, there have been few studies on DLMOs for PET.PurposeThe goal of the study is to investigate whether DLMOs can predict HOs better than conventional MOs such as CHO in a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) detection task using PET images with real anatomical variability.MethodsTwo types of DLMOs were implemented: (1) CNN DLMO, and (2) CNN-SwinT DLMO that combines CNN and Swin Transformer (SwinT) encoders. Lesion-absent PET images were reconstructed from clinical data, and lesion-present images were reconstructed with adding simulated lesion sinogram data. Lesion-present and lesion-absent PET image pairs were labeled by eight HOs consisting of four radiologists and four image scientists in a 2AFC detection task. In total, 2268 pairs of lesion-present and lesion-absent images were used for training, 324 pairs for validation, and 324 pairs for test. CNN DLMO, CNN-SwinT DLMO, CHO with internal noise, and non-prewhitening matched filter (NPWMF) were compared in the same train-test paradigm. For comparison, six quantitative metrics including prediction accuracy, mean squared errors (MSEs) and correlation coefficients, which measure how well a MO predicts HOs, were calculated in a 9-fold cross-validation experiment.ResultsIn terms of the accuracy and MSE metrics, CNN DLMO and CNN-SwinT DLMO showed better performance than CHO and NPWMF, and CNN-SwinT DLMO showed the best performance among the MOs evaluated.ConclusionsDLMO can predict HOs more accurately than conventional MOs such as CHO in PET lesion detection. Combining SwinT and CNN encoders can improve the DLMO prediction performance compared to using CNN only.
引用
收藏
页码:7093 / 7107
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of deep learning reconstruction on task-based model observer performance in CT: an anthropomorphic head phantom study
    Hernandez-Giron, Irene
    Kaasalainen, Touko
    Makela, Teemu
    Peltonen, Juha
    Kortesniemi, Mika
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2022, 12035
  • [2] Deep-learning-based model observer for a lung nodule detection task in computed tomography
    Gong, Hao
    Hu, Qiyuan
    Walther, Andrew
    Koo, Chi Wan
    Takahashi, Edwin A.
    Levin, David L.
    Johnson, Tucker F.
    Hora, Megan J.
    Leng, Shuai
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    Yu, Lifeng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 7 (04)
  • [3] Anthropomorphic model observer performance in three-dimensional detection task for low-contrast computed tomography
    Ba, Alexandre
    Eckstein, Miguel P.
    Racine, Damien
    Ott, Julien G.
    Verdun, Francis
    Kobbe-Schmidt, Sabine
    Bochud, Francois O.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 3 (01)
  • [4] DeepAMO: An Anthropomorphic Model Observer for Visual Detection Tasks in Volume Images
    Li, Ye
    Chen, Junyu
    Brown, Justin
    Treves, S. Ted
    Cao, Xinhua
    Fahey, Frederic
    Sgouros, George
    Bolch, Wesley
    Frey, Eric
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61
  • [5] An anthropomorphic model observer for spiculated masses
    Avanaki, Ali R. N.
    Espig, Kathryn S.
    Xthona, Albert
    Kimpe, Tom R. L.
    14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI 2018), 2018, 10718
  • [6] On anthropomorphic decision making in a model observer
    Avanaki, Ali R. N.
    Espig, Kathryn S.
    Kimpe, Tom R. L.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 9416
  • [7] Evaluation of CNN as anthropomorphic model observer
    Massanes, Francesc
    Brankov, Jovan G.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 10136
  • [8] Using Transfer Learning for a Deep Learning Model Observer
    Murphy, W.
    Elangovan, P.
    Halling-Brown, M.
    Lewis, E.
    Young, K. C.
    Dance, D. R.
    Wells, K.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2019, 10952
  • [9] A deep learning- and partial least square regression-based model observer for a low-contrast lesion detection task in CT
    Gong, Hao
    Yu, Lifeng
    Leng, Shuai
    Dilger, Samantha K.
    Ren, Liqiang
    Zhou, Wei
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (05) : 2052 - 2063
  • [10] Correlation between a deep-learning-based model observer and human observer for a realistic lung nodule localization task in chest CT
    Gong, Hao
    Walther, Andrew
    Hu, Qiyuan
    Koo, Chi Wan
    Takahashi, Edwin A.
    Levin, David L.
    Johnson, Tucker F.
    Hora, Megan J.
    Leng, Shuai
    Fletcher, J. G.
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    Yu, Lifeng
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2019, 10952