Is Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair a Viable Option? A Systematic Review of Recurrent Instability following Bankart Repair

被引:0
|
作者
Baur, Alexander [1 ]
Raghuwanshi, Jasraj [2 ]
Gwathmey, F. Winston [3 ]
机构
[1] Liberty Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, Lynchburg, VA 24502 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[3] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Sports Med, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
anterior shoulder dislocation; glenoid labrum repair; GBL; HSL; Latarjet technique; SHOULDER INSTABILITY; LATARJET PROCEDURE; BONE DEFECTS; STABILIZATION; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; SALVAGE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13113067
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Recurrent shoulder instability following Bankart lesion repair often necessitates surgical revision. This systematic review aims to understand the failure rates of arthroscopic revision Bankart repair. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO, this systematic review examined twenty-five articles written between 2000 and 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility across three databases, focusing on recurrent instability as the primary endpoint, while also noting functional measures, adverse events, revision operations, and return-to-sport rates when available. Results: The key surgical techniques for recurrent instability post-Bankart repair were identified, with revision arthroscopic Bankart being the most common (685/1032). A comparative analysis revealed a significantly lower recurrence for open coracoid transfer compared to arthroscopic revision Bankart repair (9.67% vs. 17.14%; p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between remplissage plus Bankart repair and Bankart repair alone (23.75% vs. 17.14%; p = 0.24). The majority of studies did not include supracritical glenoid bone loss or engaging Hill-Sachs lesions, and neither subcritical nor non-engaging lesions significantly influenced recurrence rates (p = 0.85 and p = 0.80, respectively). Conclusions: Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair remains a viable option in the absence of bipolar bone loss; however, open coracoid transfer appears to have lower recurrence rates than arthroscopic Bankart repair, consistent with prior evidence. Further studies should define cutoffs and investigate the roles of critical glenoid bone loss and off-track Hill-Sachs lesions. Preoperative measurements of GBL on three-dimensional computed tomography and characterizing lesions based on glenoid track will help surgeons to choose ideal candidates for arthroscopic revision Bankart repair.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic electrothermal capsulorrhaphy with Bankart repair and isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair
    Sheila McRae
    Jeff Leiter
    Kanthalu Subramanian
    Robert Litchfield
    Peter MacDonald
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 414 - 421
  • [42] ARTHROSCOPIC BANKART SUTURE REPAIR
    GRANA, WA
    BUCKLEY, PD
    YATES, CK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (03): : 348 - 353
  • [43] Acute arthroscopic Bankart repair?
    Arciero, RA
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2000, 8 (02) : 127 - 128
  • [44] The arthroscopic extraarticular Bankart repair
    Golser, K
    Wambacher, M
    Hausberger, K
    Krallinger, F
    Wischatta, R
    Kinigadner, M
    Sperner, G
    ORTHOPADE, 1998, 27 (08): : 532 - 541
  • [45] Editorial Commentary: Is It Time to Take a Stand? When Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Is No Longer a Viable Option for Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (09): : 2537 - 2540
  • [46] Randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic electrothermal capsulorrhaphy with Bankart repair and isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair
    McRae, Sheila
    Leiter, Jeff
    Subramanian, Kanthalu
    Litchfield, Robert
    MacDonald, Peter
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (02) : 414 - 421
  • [47] Arthroscopic Bankart repair following traumatic recurrent shoulder dislocation: A prospective review of 30 cases
    Parmar, R. S.
    Kapoor, Sanjeev
    Sharma, Bhanu
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 27 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [48] Return to Sport After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage: A Systematic Review
    Gouveia, Kyle
    Harbour, Eric
    Athwal, George S.
    Khan, Moin
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (04): : 1046 - +
  • [49] Revision Open Bankart Surgery After Arthroscopic Repair for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Cho, Nam Su
    Yi, Jin Woong
    Lee, Bong Gun
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (11): : 2158 - 2164
  • [50] Instability Severity Index Score predicts recurrent shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair
    van Blommestein, Matthijs Y. H.
    Govaert, Lonneke H. M.
    van der Palen, Job
    Verra, Wiebe C.
    Koorevaar, Rinco C. T.
    Schroeder, Femke F.
    Veen, Egbert Jan D.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2024, 32 (08) : 2152 - 2160