Is Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair a Viable Option? A Systematic Review of Recurrent Instability following Bankart Repair

被引:0
|
作者
Baur, Alexander [1 ]
Raghuwanshi, Jasraj [2 ]
Gwathmey, F. Winston [3 ]
机构
[1] Liberty Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, Lynchburg, VA 24502 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[3] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Sports Med, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
anterior shoulder dislocation; glenoid labrum repair; GBL; HSL; Latarjet technique; SHOULDER INSTABILITY; LATARJET PROCEDURE; BONE DEFECTS; STABILIZATION; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; SALVAGE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13113067
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Recurrent shoulder instability following Bankart lesion repair often necessitates surgical revision. This systematic review aims to understand the failure rates of arthroscopic revision Bankart repair. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO, this systematic review examined twenty-five articles written between 2000 and 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility across three databases, focusing on recurrent instability as the primary endpoint, while also noting functional measures, adverse events, revision operations, and return-to-sport rates when available. Results: The key surgical techniques for recurrent instability post-Bankart repair were identified, with revision arthroscopic Bankart being the most common (685/1032). A comparative analysis revealed a significantly lower recurrence for open coracoid transfer compared to arthroscopic revision Bankart repair (9.67% vs. 17.14%; p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between remplissage plus Bankart repair and Bankart repair alone (23.75% vs. 17.14%; p = 0.24). The majority of studies did not include supracritical glenoid bone loss or engaging Hill-Sachs lesions, and neither subcritical nor non-engaging lesions significantly influenced recurrence rates (p = 0.85 and p = 0.80, respectively). Conclusions: Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair remains a viable option in the absence of bipolar bone loss; however, open coracoid transfer appears to have lower recurrence rates than arthroscopic Bankart repair, consistent with prior evidence. Further studies should define cutoffs and investigate the roles of critical glenoid bone loss and off-track Hill-Sachs lesions. Preoperative measurements of GBL on three-dimensional computed tomography and characterizing lesions based on glenoid track will help surgeons to choose ideal candidates for arthroscopic revision Bankart repair.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors for recurrent instability or revision surgery following arthroscopic Bankart repair
    Mahure, S. A.
    Mollon, B.
    Capogna, B. M.
    Zuckerman, J. D.
    Kwon, Y. W.
    Rokito, A. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (03): : 324 - 330
  • [2] Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    Bedi, Asheesh
    Ryu, Richard K. N.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2010, 18 (03): : 130 - 139
  • [3] Complications following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review
    Rodriguez, Kaitlyn
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Park, Caroline N.
    Bulleit, Clark
    Levin, Jay M.
    Klifto, Christopher S.
    Dickens, Jonathan F.
    Lau, Brian C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (02) : 435 - 440
  • [4] Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    Abouali, Jihad Alexander Karim
    Hatzantoni, Katerina
    Holtby, Richard
    Veillette, Christian
    Theodoropoulos, John
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (09): : 1572 - 1578
  • [5] Arthroscopic revision of Bankart repair
    Neri, Brian R.
    Tuckman, David V.
    Bra, Jonathan Frcsc Andrew S. Rokito Md New York Ny
    Yim, Duke
    Saholpal, Deenesh T.
    Rokito, Andrew S.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (04) : 419 - 424
  • [6] Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
    Yon, Chang-Jin
    Cho, Chul-Hyun
    Kim, Du-Han
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (11) : 1 - 12
  • [7] Return to sport following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review
    Memon, Muzammil
    Kay, Jeffrey
    Cadet, Edwin R.
    Shahsavar, Shayan
    Simunovic, Nicole
    Ayeni, Olufemi R.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (07) : 1342 - 1347
  • [8] Clinical outcomes of revision arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies
    Haskel, Jonathan D.
    Wang, Karina H.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Markus, Danielle H.
    Campbell, Kirk A.
    Alaia, Michael J.
    Millett, Peter J.
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (01) : 209 - 216
  • [9] Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability After a Failed Arthroscopic Soft-Tissue Repair Yields Comparable Failure Rates to Primary Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review
    Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar
    Sakha, Seaher
    Tejpal, Tushar
    Leroux, Timothy
    Kirsch, Jacob M.
    Khan, Moin
    HSS JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (01) : 145 - 155
  • [10] Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Outcomes for Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Asiri, Faya Ali M.
    Alqhtani, Abdulrhman Abdullh
    Assiri, Abdullah Hassan
    Alqahtani, Mohammed Hassan
    Tedla, Jaya Shanker
    Awwadh, Bushra Ali Abdullah
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2024, 30