A randomized controlled trial to compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer following the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response

被引:5
|
作者
Chen, Zhi Qin [1 ]
Ai, Ai [1 ]
Zhang, Yuan [1 ]
Li, He [2 ]
Wang, Jing Yun [1 ]
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Ng, Ernest Hung Yu [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Ctr Assisted Reprod, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Shanghai Ji Ai Genet & IVF Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Clin Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Sch Clin Med,Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PITUITARY SUPPRESSION; LH SURGE; IVF; DYDROGESTERONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) after ovarian stimulation by the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response who were undergoing in vitro fertilization. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: A tertiary assisted reproduction center. Patients: Women with infertility aged <43 years undergoing the first in vitro fertilization cycle and having antral follicle count of >15. Interventions: Medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily was given from the start of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger in the PPOS protocol. In the antagonist protocol, an antagonist 0.25 mg daily was given from the sixth day of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger. Blinding was not possible for women or physicians but the biostatistician was blinded to the group assignment. Main Outcome Measure: Live birth rate of the first FET cycle. Results: A total of 784 women were recruited from June 2020 and October 2021 and assigned randomly in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: PPOS group (n = 392) and antagonist group (n = 392). Embryo transfer was either cancelled or postponed in 62 women (62/392, 15.8%) in the PPOS group and 65 (65/392, 16.6%) in the antagonist group because of no transferable embryos or no FET within 6 months after randomization. The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics and the numbers of oocytes obtained or fertilized, cleaving embryos, good-quality embryos at day 3, blastocysts developed, and embryos or blastocysts frozen. There was no statistically significant difference in the live birth rate of the first FET cycle between the PPOS and antagonist groups on the basis of both the intention-to-treat analysis (37.5.0% [147/392] vs. 32.7% [128/392]; relative risk, 1.148 [95% confidence interval, 0.949-1.390]) and per-protocol analysis (44.5% [147/330] vs. 39.1% [128/327]; relative risk, 1.138 [95% confidence interval, 0.950-1.364]). Both groups showed comparable clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and cumulative live birth rates. Conclusion: The live birth rates of the first FET following the PPOS and antagonist protocols were comparable in women with an anticipated high ovarian response.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 945
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus Mild Stimulation Protocol in Advanced Age Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing Their First In Vitro Fertilization Cycle: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Tu, Xiaoyu
    You, Bingbing
    Jing, Miaomiao
    Lin, Chenxi
    Zhang, Runju
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [22] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in combination with clomiphene citrate in normalovulatory women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatments: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Y.
    Chen, Q.
    Yu, S.
    Lyu, Q.
    Ai, A.
    Kuang, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 297 - 297
  • [23] Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Versus Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients With Asynchronous Follicular Development During Controlled Ovulation Stimulation: A Retrospective Study
    Dong, Mei
    Sun, Li
    Huang, Li
    Wang, Fang
    Zhang, Xiqian
    Liu, Fenghua
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [24] Flexible progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus a GnRH antagonist protocol in predicted suboptimal responders undergoing freeze-all cycles: a randomized non-inferiority trial
    Cai, He
    Shi, Zan
    Liu, Danmeng
    Bai, Haiyan
    Zhou, Hanying
    Xue, Xia
    Li, Wei
    Li, Mingzhao
    Zhao, Xiaoli
    Ma, Chun
    Wang, Hui
    Wang, Tao
    Li, Na
    Wen, Wen
    Wang, Min
    Zhang, Dian
    Mol, Ben W.
    Shi, Juanzi
    Tian, Li
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 40 (02)
  • [25] Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles
    Vidal, M. del Mar
    Martinez, Francisca
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 (05) : 1098 - 1104
  • [26] Effect of Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Outcomes of Aged Infertile Women Who Failed to Get Pregnant in the First IVF/ICSI Cycle: A Self-controlled Study
    Chen, Yin-mei
    Qi, Qian-rong
    Xie, Qing-zhen
    Yang, Yi-fan
    Xia, Yi
    Zhou, Xiao-dan
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 38 (03) : 513 - 518
  • [27] Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial
    Luo, Xiu
    Pei, Li
    Li, Fujie
    Li, Chunli
    Huang, Guoning
    Ye, Hong
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [28] Fixed versus flexible antagonist protocol in women with predicted high ovarian response except PCOS: a randomized controlled trial
    Xiu Luo
    Li Pei
    Fujie Li
    Chunli Li
    Guoning Huang
    Hong Ye
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [29] Effect of Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Outcomes of Aged Infertile Women Who Failed to Get Pregnant in the First IVF/ ICSI Cycle: A Self-controlled Study
    Yin-mei Chen
    Qian-rong Qi
    Qing-zhen Xie
    Yi-fan Yang
    Yi Xia
    Xiao-dan Zhou
    Current Medical Science, 2018, 38 : 513 - 518
  • [30] Pregnancy outcomes of PCOS overweight/obese patients after controlled ovarian stimulation with the GnRH antagonist protocol and frozen embryo transfer
    Chen, Rui
    Chen, Shiping
    Liu, Manting
    He, Hua
    Xu, Haiyan
    Liu, Hanyan
    Du, Hongzi
    Wang, Weihua
    Xia, Xuefeng
    Liu, Jianqiao
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 16