DOES CONFUCIANISM AFFECT CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DECOUPLING? EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Jinyu [1 ]
Chen, Zekun [1 ]
Zhang, Juan [2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Coll Business Adm, Beijing 100072, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Union Univ, Training Ct, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
confucianism; CSR decoupling; legal environment; internal control quality; managerial myopia; equity concentration; INTERNAL CONTROL; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FIRM VALUE; DISCLOSURE; ETHICS; OWNERSHIP; QUALITY; TRUST; LEGITIMACY; BUSINESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given the persistent challenge of corporate social responsibility decoupling (CSR decoupling), we conduct a systematic analysis of the impact of Confucianism on CSR decoupling through the lens of informal institutions instead of previous inherent formal institutions. The empirical results show that Confucianism significantly inhibits CSR decoupling. The substitution effect test indicates that this relationship is more evident in companies with poor internal control quality and regions with weak legal environments, suggesting a substitution effect between informal and formal institutions in restraining CSR decoupling. The mechanism test demonstrates that Confucianism primarily restrains CSR decoupling by mitigating managerial myopia and decreasing equity concentration. The heterogeneity analysis suggests that the inhibitory effect of Confucianism on CSR decoupling is more evident in regions experiencing mild cultural conflicts, companies with poorer operating conditions, and state- owned enterprises. Our research contributes to the literature on the relationship between Confucianism and CSR decoupling, offering a novel perspective for addressing this phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does foreign experience of top management affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China
    Li, Wanfu
    Jiang, Mengmeng
    Zhang, Xuejiao
    Wang, Yu
    Qu, Xiaoyi
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 122
  • [32] How Does Taxation Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from a Korean Tax Reform
    Park, Hyejin
    Lee, Jiyoon
    Shin, Jewon
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2024, 192 (04) : 745 - 774
  • [33] Does board diversity affect quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Pakistan
    Khan, Ismail
    Khan, Imran
    bin Saeed, Bilal
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (06) : 1371 - 1381
  • [34] Does corporate social responsibility matter to management forecast precision? Evidence from China
    Chen, Xiangyu
    Wan, Peng
    Quan, Xiaofeng
    Sial, Muhammad Safdar
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2020, 33 (01): : 1767 - 1795
  • [35] Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness?
    Laguir, Issam
    Stagliano, Raffaele
    Elbaz, Jamal
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 107 : 662 - 675
  • [36] The Corporate Economic Influence and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China
    Guo, Lan
    Yang, Ling
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [37] Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: new evidence from China
    Aboud, Ahmed
    Yang, Xinming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (02) : 211 - 229
  • [38] Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China
    Liao, Lin
    Lin, Teng
    Zhang, Yuyu
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 150 (01) : 211 - 225
  • [39] Corporate social responsibility and corporate innovation efficiency: evidence from China
    Yuan, Ling
    Zheng, Li
    Xu, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2023, 18 (12) : 6125 - 6142
  • [40] Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China
    Lin Liao
    Teng (Philip) Lin
    Yuyu Zhang
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 150 : 211 - 225