Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames with and without Masonry Infill Walls: Experimental and Numerical Models

被引:2
|
作者
Zhu, Ruizhao [1 ]
Guo, Tong [1 ]
Song, Lianglong [2 ]
Yang, Kun [3 ]
Xu, Gang [3 ]
Tesfamariam, Solomon [4 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 200 Univ Ave, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Masonry infill wall (MIW); Self-centering; Prestressed concrete frame; Quasi-static test; Vulnerability; Mainshock-aftershock; INCLUDING RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS; PERFORMANCE; CONNECTION; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13207
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Interaction between masonry infill walls (MIWs) and a main structural system can impact the overall structural performance. However, there is no test to investigate the impact of MIWs on self-centering prestressed concrete (SCPC) frames, nor has there been a probabilistic performance evaluation considering the coupling effects of peak interstory drift ratio (PIDR) and residual interstory drift ratio (RIDR). This study compares the seismic performance of SCPC frames with and without MIWs through quasi-static tests and seismic risk assessment under mainshock-aftershock (MSAS) sequences. To begin, quasi-static tests on one-story SCPC frames with and without MIWs are performed to assess their seismic performance. A numerical simulation method for the SCPC frame with MIWs is then proposed and validated. Following that, the seismic performance of four multistory SCPC frames with and without MIWs is investigated under MSAS sequences at the maximum considered earthquake level. Finally, the seismic vulnerability assessment, considering the coupling effect of PIDR and RIDR under MSAS sequences, is conducted. The results indicate that cracks on the MIW present diagonal stepped cracks, and the MIW does not cause damage to the SCPC frame. When the MIW is damaged, the RIDR of the SCPC-MIW frame increases significantly; when the crack development is stable, the RIDR increases slowly as the interstory drift increases but remains at a very low level. Besides, when the MIW is damaged, an obvious deformation concentration effect occurs on the SCPC-MIW frame. The SCPC-MIW frame has a lower probability of exceeding the immediate occupancy level P(IO) than the SCPC frame, but it has a higher probability of exceeding the repairable level P(RE) when the seismic intensity is relatively small. Overall, the P(IO) and P(RE) of the SCPC and SCPC-MIW frames are higher under MSAS sequences than under MS-only sequences, except for the SCPC25 frame.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental and numerical study on the seismic behavior of an external prestressed self-centering frame structure
    Xia, Wanqiu
    Lu, Liang
    Liu, Xia
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 76
  • [22] Seismic fragility and risk assessment of self-centering wall structures with traditional and sliding joint infill walls
    Zhu, Xiaoying
    Wu, Hao
    Zhou, Ying
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 284
  • [23] Seismic performance of self-centering prestressed concrete frame with auxetic perforated steel plate shear walls
    Zhu, Yazhi
    Zhang, Jun-Hua
    Cai, Xiaoning
    Wang, Peng
    Chen, Xingwang
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2025, 101
  • [24] Experimental study of a self-centering prestressed concrete frame subassembly
    Song, Liang-Long
    Guo, Tong
    Gu, Yu
    Cao, Zhi-Liang
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 88 : 176 - 188
  • [25] Seismic performance of RC frames with self-centering precast post-tensioned connections considering the effect of infill walls
    Dai, Kaoshan
    Sun, Tongfei
    Liu, Ye
    Li, Tao
    Xu, Jun
    Bezabeh, Matiyas A.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 171
  • [26] Influence of infill configurations on seismic responses of steel self-centering moment resisting frames
    Huang, Xiaogang
    Zhou, Zhen
    Hua, Kun
    Guo, Congming
    Zhu, Dongping
    Xia, Tianyang
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2018, 27 (10):
  • [27] Seismic performance and risk assessment of self-centering steel braced frames considering failure of prestressed tendons
    Ping Y.
    Fang C.
    Chen Y.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43 (07): : 1 - 10and20
  • [28] Seismic Performance of Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Frames with Masonry Infill Walls-II: Collapse Assessment
    Sattar, Siamak
    Liel, Abbie B.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2016, 32 (02) : 819 - 842
  • [29] Energy-based seismic design for self-centering concrete frames
    Ge Song
    T. Y. Yang
    Ying Zhou
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19 : 5113 - 5137
  • [30] Seismic resilience analysis of self-centering prestressed concrete frames with generalized flag-shaped hysteretic behavior
    Zheng, Jule
    Zhou, Zhen
    Zeng, Bin
    Huang, Linjie
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 297