Harnessing ML and GIS for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Prioritization

被引:0
|
作者
Shalu [1 ]
Acharya, Twinkle [1 ]
Gharekhan, Dhwanilnath [1 ]
Samal, Anddipak [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Environm Planning & Technol CEPT Univ, Fac Technol, Kasturbhai Lalbhai Campus, Ahmadabad 380009, India
[2] Tata Inst Social Sci, VN Purav Marg, Mumbai 400088, India
来源
关键词
Machine learning; earthquake; artificial neural network; random forest; seismic vulnerability; HAZARD; INDIA;
D O I
10.32604/rig.2024.051788
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Seismic vulnerability modeling plays a crucial role in seismic risk assessment, aiding decision-makers in pinpointing areas and structures most prone to earthquake damage. While machine learning (ML) algorithms and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have emerged as promising tools for seismic vulnerability modeling, there remains a notable gap in comprehensive geospatial studies focused on India. Previous studies in seismic vulnerability modeling have primarily focused on specific regions or countries, often overlooking the unique challenges and characteristics of India. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to seismic vulnerability modeling, leveraging ML and GIS to address these gaps. Employing Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Random Forest algorithms, we predict damage intensity values for earthquake events based on various factors such as location, depth, land cover, proximity to major roads, rivers, soil type, population density, and distance from fault lines. A case study in the Satara district of Maharashtra underscores the effectiveness of our model in identifying vulnerable buildings and enhancing seismic risk assessment at a local level. This innovative approach not only fills the gap in existing research by providing predictive modeling for seismic damage intensity but also offers a valuable tool for disaster management and urban planning decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 134
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Data mining methods for GIS analysis of seismic vulnerability
    Leon, Florin
    Atanasiu, Gabriela M.
    ICSOFT 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND DATA TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 2, 2006, : 153 - +
  • [42] Seismic risk prioritization of residential buildings in Istanbul
    Yakut, Ahmet
    Sucuoglu, Haluk
    Akkar, Sinan
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (11): : 1533 - 1547
  • [43] Vulnerability assessment of forest landslide risk using GIS adaptation to climate change
    Lim, Soo Jeong
    Park, Hee Jung
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    Park, Se Ik
    Han, Sang Sub
    Kim, Hyun June
    Lee, Sang Hyun
    FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 12 (04) : 207 - 213
  • [44] Regional radiation risk and vulnerability assessment by integration of mathematical modelling and GIS analysis
    Rigima, O
    Baklanov, A
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 27 (07) : 527 - 540
  • [45] Context-Based Vulnerability Risk Scoring and Prioritization
    Shah, Dhruv Prashant
    Patel, Shreyans Munesh
    Tailor, Jainam Vinay
    Bhagat, Shubh Rajiv Kumar
    Nanade, Archana
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, ICICC 2022, VOL 1, 2023, 473 : 685 - 693
  • [46] Prioritization of Flood Vulnerability Zones Using Remote Sensing and GIS for Hydrological Modelling
    Anees, Mohd Talha
    Abdullah, K.
    Nawawi, M. N. M.
    Rahman, Nik Norulaini Nik A.
    Ismail, Ahmad Zuhdi
    Syakir, M. I.
    Kadir, Mohd Omar Abdul
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2019, 68 (02) : 176 - 190
  • [47] Combining hazard, social vulnerability and resilience to provide a proposal for seismic risk assessment
    Azzimonti, Oscar Luigi
    Colleoni, Matteo
    De Amicis, Mattia
    Frigerio, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2020, 23 (09) : 1225 - 1241
  • [48] On the utility of story loss functions for regional seismic vulnerability modeling and risk assessment
    O'Reilly, Gerard J.
    Shahnazaryan, Davit
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (03) : 1933 - 1955
  • [49] Seismic risk analysis: a method for the vulnerability assessment of built-up areas
    Giovinazzi, S
    Lagomarsino, S
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 671 - 679
  • [50] Modernist Unreinforced Masonry (URM) Buildings of Barcelona: Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment
    Gonzalez-Drigo, R.
    Avila-Haro, A.
    Barbat, A. H.
    Pujades, L. G.
    Vargas, Y. F.
    Lagomarsino, S.
    Cattari, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2015, 9 (03) : 214 - 230