Rethinking the clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) signal-to-noise ratio

ObjectiveDistortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels are repeatable over time in normal-hearing individuals making DPOAE levels an ideal measurement for monitoring cochlear status in clinic and research applications. However, if DPOAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values instead of levels are used for monitoring, the repeatability of this value needs to be established. This retrospective, cross-sectional study sought to determine DPOAE SNR repeatability in younger children, older children, young adults and a patient population with normal hearing.DesignEach participant attended four sessions where DPOAE discrete frequency sweeps were collected at conventional (<= 8kHz) and/or extended-high frequencies (> 8kHz). To examine the extent of variability to be expected for DPOAE SNR, average absolute SNR differences-between-trials were determined and compared to average absolute DPOAE level differences-between-trials.Study samplesOne hundred forty-five participants, incorporating four different groups from three different studies. Ages ranged from 3 to 55years.ResultsAverage SNR differences-between-trials across all frequencies are greater than differences for average DPOAE levels. Improved calibration methods result in SNR differences-between-trials that are similar across all frequenciesConclusionsWhen monitoring cochlear health over an extended bandwidth, DPOAE levels are less variable across trials than SNR values, thus allowing earlier indicators of cochlear damage.