Formative assessment in K-12 English as a foreign language education: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Han [1 ]
Ge, Shigang [1 ]
Saad, Mohd Rashid Bin Mohd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Educ, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
Formative assessment; Assessment for learning; Systematic review; English as a foreign language; ASSESSMENT LITERACY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31367
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The surge of globalisation and the recognition of English as a lingua franca have propelled the worldwide advancement of English as a foreign language (EFL) education. Formative assessment can support the English language teaching and learning in classroom settings. This systematic review critically analyses recent research on formative assessment within K-12 EFL education, underscoring its substantial role in enhancing teaching efficacy and student outcomes. Specifically, it addresses three key aspects: the beliefs, perceptions and literacy of teachers and students regarding formative assessment, the effectiveness of different assessment practices on learners' performance and the contextual challenges in implementing these strategies. A comprehensive analysis of qualitative and quantitative studies reveals that the attitudes of teachers and students considerably influence the effectiveness of formative assessment. Innovative methods, such as technology-assisted and peer assessments, show promise in enhancing learner outcomes. However, the education system and cultural contexts present persistent challenges in implementing formative assessment in EFL classes. The findings highlight the importance of ensuring professional training for educators and raising student awareness regarding the benefits of formative assessment. This study emphasises the need for aligning adaptable assessment practices with diverse educational environments and calls for a closer integration of theoretical and practical approaches in EFL education. Moreover, this review provides valuable insights into formative assessment strategies in EFL learning, offering guidance for educators, policymakers and stakeholders in language education.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nutrition Education and Body Mass Index in Grades K-12: A Systematic Review
    Price, Cayla
    Cohen, Deborah
    Pribis, Peter
    Cerami, Jean
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2017, 87 (09) : 715 - 720
  • [42] Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in K-12 education (2017–2022)
    Martin F.
    Zhuang M.
    Schaefer D.
    Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 6
  • [43] Assessing English Language Proficiency in US K-12 Schools
    Schissel, Jamie L.
    LANGUAGE TESTING, 2021, 38 (03) : 480 - 482
  • [44] A systematic review of threat assessment in K-12 schools: Adult and child outcomes
    Ross, Dorie
    von der Embse, Nathaniel
    Andrews, Jessica L.
    Headley, Mollie McCullough
    Mierzwa, Caroline
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL VIOLENCE, 2022, 21 (04) : 444 - 458
  • [45] Context and Implications Document for: Assessment of Creativity in K-12 Education: A Scoping Review
    Bolden, Benjamin
    DeLuca, Christopher
    Kukkonen, Tiina
    Roy, Suparna
    Wearing, Judy
    REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2020, 8 (02): : 377 - 379
  • [46] K-12 EDUCATION
    SCHMIDT, MT
    GEOTIMES, 1991, 36 (02): : 56 - 56
  • [47] K-12 education
    Brunkhorst, BJ
    GEOTIMES, 1996, 41 (02): : 19 - 20
  • [48] An Assessment of Geospatial Technology Integration in K-12 Education
    Osborne, Zachary M.
    van de Gevel, Saskia L.
    Eck, Montana A.
    Sugg, Margaret
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 119 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [49] The Design and Development of a Classroom Evaluation System for K-12 Formative Assessment in China
    Liu, Qingtang
    Yu, Qinchun
    Ba, Shen
    2021 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ISET 2021), 2021, : 192 - 196
  • [50] A systematic review of the role of learning games in fostering mathematics education in K-12 settings
    Pan, Yanjun
    Ke, Fengfeng
    Xu, Xinhao
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2022, 36