Impact of D-dimer on in-hospital mortality following aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Srikanth, Sashwath [1 ]
Abrishami, Shabnam [2 ]
Subramanian, Lakshmi [1 ]
Mahadevaiah, Ashwini [3 ]
Vyas, Ankit [4 ]
Jain, Akhil [5 ]
Nathaniel, Sangeetha [6 ]
Gnanaguruparan, Subramanian [6 ]
Desai, Rupak
机构
[1] ECU Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Med, Greenville, NC 27834 USA
[2] Independent Outcomes Res, Dept Res, Los Angeles, CA 90036 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Harvard T H Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Ochsner Clin Fdn, Dept Vasc Med, New Orleans, LA 70121 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Leukemia, Houston, TX 77079 USA
[6] Heart & Vasc Clin, Dept Cardiol, 620 Stanton Christiana Rd,Suite 203, Newark, DE 19713 USA
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2024年 / 16卷 / 06期
关键词
D-dimer; Aortic dissection; Mortality; Biomarker; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; ADMISSION;
D O I
10.4330/wjc.v16.i6.355
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The utility of D-dimer (DD) as a biomarker for acute aortic dissection (AD) is recognized. Yet, its predictive value for in-hospital mortality remains uncertain and subject to conflicting evidence. AIM To conduct a meta-analysis of AD-related in-hospital mortality (ADIM) with elevated DD levels. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar for AD and ADIM literature through May 2022. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics and effect size (hazard or odds ratio) analysis with random-effects models. Sample size, study type, and patients' mean age were used for subgroup analysis. The significance threshold was P < 0.05. RESULTS Thirteen studies (3628 patients) were included in our study. The pooled prevalence of ADIM was 20% (95%CI: 15%-25%). Despite comparable demographic characteristics and comorbidities, elevated DD values were associated with higher ADIM risk (unadjusted effect size: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.34-2.8; adjusted effect size: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.05-1.19, P < 0.01). Studies involving patients with a mean age of < 60 years exhibited an increased mortality risk (effect size: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.23-1.67, P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in studies with a mean age > 60 years. Prospective and larger sample size studies (n > 250) demonstrated a heightened likelihood of ADIM associated with elevated DD levels (effect size: 2.57, 95%CI: 1.30-5.08, P < 0.01 vs effect size: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.00-1.11, P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis shows elevated DD increases in-hospital mortality risk in AD patients, highlighting the need for larger, prospective studies to improve risk prediction models.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 362
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPACT OF D-DIMER ON IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY FOLLOWING AORTIC DISSECTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Srikanth, Sashwath
    Mahadevaiah, Ashwini
    Abrishami, Shabnam
    Niaz, Rabiya
    Aqeel, Mariam
    Narula, Harshit
    Thota, Anjani
    Saeed, Memoona
    Singh, Monika
    Yarrarapu, Siva Naga
    Desai, Rupak
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 2060 - 2060
  • [2] D-dimer as a Biomarker for Acute Aortic Dissection A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Cui, Jia-sen
    Jing, Zai-ping
    Zhuang, Shun-jiu
    Qi, Shao-hong
    Li, Li
    Zhou, Jun-wen
    Zhang, Wang
    Zhao, Yun
    Qi, Ning
    Yin, Yang-jun
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (04)
  • [3] Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tsutsumi, Yusuke
    Tsujimoto, Yasushi
    Takahashi, Sei
    Tsuchiya, Asuka
    Fukuma, Shingo
    Yamamoto, Yosuke
    Fukuhara, Shunichi
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2020, 9 (3_SUPPL) : S32 - S39
  • [4] Plasma D-dimer and in-hospital mortality in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection
    Tian, Li
    Fan, Xiaohan
    Zhu, Jun
    Liang, Yan
    Li, Jiandong
    Yang, Yanmin
    BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2014, 25 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [5] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of D-dimer as a Rule-out Test for Suspected Acute Aortic Dissection
    Asha, Stephen E.
    Miers, James W.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 66 (04) : 368 - 378
  • [6] Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of D-Dimer to Diagnose Acute Aortic Dissection
    Shimony, Avi
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Mottillo, Salvatore
    Dourian, Tara
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 107 (08): : 1227 - 1234
  • [7] D-dimer in preeclampsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pinheiro, Melina de Barros
    Garcia Junqueira, Daniela Rezende
    Coelho, Fernanda Fonseca
    Freitas, Leticia G.
    Carvalho, Maria G.
    Gomes, Karina Braga
    Santana Dusse, Luci Maria
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2012, 414 : 166 - 170
  • [8] The diagnostic value of D-dimer in acute aortic dissection: a meta-analysis
    Jian Yao
    Tao Bai
    Bo Yang
    Lizhong Sun
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 16
  • [9] The diagnostic value of D-dimer in acute aortic dissection: a meta-analysis
    Yao, Jian
    Bai, Tao
    Yang, Bo
    Sun, Lizhong
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [10] Investigating the Efficiency of D-Dimer Test in Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Study and Meta-Analysis
    Ahmadi, Iraj
    Qavam, Samira Mis
    Sayehmiri, Kourosh
    Golitaleb, Mohamad
    Tavan, Hamed
    INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (04) : 142 - 147