Long-term survival after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement for low or intermediate surgical risk aortic stenosis: Comparison with general population

被引:6
|
作者
Maeda, Shusaku [1 ]
Toda, Koichi [1 ]
Shimamura, Kazuo [1 ]
Yoshioka, Daisuke [1 ]
Maeda, Koichi [1 ]
Yamada, Yu [1 ]
Igeta, Masataka [2 ]
Sakata, Yasushi
Sawa, Yoshiki [1 ,3 ]
Miyagawa, Shigeru [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Hyogo Coll Med, Dept Biostat, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation; Choice of intervention; Long-term outcome; Real-world population; DURABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.08.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Long-term survival after surgery for severe aortic stenosis (AS) provides important information regarding the choice between surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter (TAVR) aortic valve replacement. This study investigated the long-term survival of AS patients with low or intermediate surgical risk who underwent SAVR or TAVR in our institution versus that of the Japanese general population. Methods: From 2009 to 2019, 1276 consecutive patients underwent SAVR or TAVR for severe AS. Among them, we retrospectively investigated those with low (n = 383) or intermediate (n = 137) surgical risk treated with SAVR and those with low (n = 86) or intermediate (n = 333) surgical risk treated with TAVR. Their post-intervention survival was compared with that of an age-and gender-matched Japanese general population. Results: The overall 5-year survival rate of SAVR for patients with low surgical risk (mean age, 72 +/- 9 years) was not significantly different from that of the general population (90 % vs. 89%, respectively; p = 0.58), whereas that of patients with intermediate surgical risk (77 +/- 6 years) was significantly lower than that of the general popu-lation (77 % vs. 84 %, respectively; p = 0.03). After TAVR, the 5-year survival of patients with low (78 +/- 8 years) or intermediate (83 +/- 5 years) surgical risk was significantly lower than that of the general population (low risk, 64 % vs. 81 %, p < 0.01; intermediate risk, 66 % vs. 71 %, respectively, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that long-term survival after SAVR for AS patients with low surgical risk was as good as that of the age-and gender-matched general population, while the long-term survival after SAVR for intermediate-risk or TAVR for low-or intermediate-risk patients was lower than that of the general population. These findings suggest that SAVR is an appropriate option for AS patients with low surgical risk and good life expectancy, especially in Japan, where the life expectancy is the longest worldwide. (c) 2022 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 75
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Neurological damage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients
    Abdul-Jawad Altisent, Omar
    Ferreira-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Marsal, Josep R.
    Ribera, Aida
    Auger, Cristina
    Ortega, Gemma
    Cascant, Purificacion
    Urena, Marina
    Garcia Del Blanco, Bruno
    Serra, Vicenc
    Sureda, Carlos
    Igual, Albert
    Rovira, Alex
    Teresa Gonzalez-Alujas, Maria
    Gonzalez, Anna
    Puri, Rishi
    Cuellar, Hug
    Tornos, Pilar
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    Garcia-Dorado, David
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 105 (06) : 508 - 517
  • [42] Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Hawkins, Robert B.
    Deeb, G. Michael
    Sukul, Devraj
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Gualano, Sarah K.
    Chetcuti, Stanley J.
    Grossman, P. Michael
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    Fukuhara, Shinichi
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (08) : 942 - 953
  • [43] 3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis
    Forrest, John K.
    Deeb, G. Michael
    Yakubov, Steven J.
    Gada, Hemal
    Mumtaz, Mubashir A.
    Ramlawi, Basel
    Bajwa, Tanvir
    Teirstein, Paul S.
    DeFrain, Michael
    Muppala, Murali
    Rutkin, Bruce J.
    Chawla, Atul
    Jenson, Bart
    Chetcuti, Stanley J.
    Stoler, Robert C.
    Poulin, Marie-France
    Khabbaz, Kamal
    Levack, Melissa
    Goel, Kashish
    Tchetche, Didier
    Lam, Ka Yan
    Tonino, Pim A. L.
    Ito, Saki
    Oh, Jae K.
    Huang, Jian
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    Kleiman, Neal
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Low Risk Trial Investigators
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (17) : 1663 - 1674
  • [44] Midterm Clinical Outcomes after Isolated Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis
    Handa, Kazuma
    Maeda, Koichi
    Pak, Kyongsun
    Shimamura, Kazuo
    Yamashita, Kizuku
    Kawamura, Ai
    Miyagawa, Shigeru
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 30 (01)
  • [45] Impact of concomitant aortic regurgitation on long-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis
    Suad Catovic
    Zoran B Popovic
    Nebojsa Tasic
    Dusko Nezic
    Predrag Milojevic
    Bosko Djukanovic
    Sinisa Gradinac
    Lazar Angelkov
    Petar Otasevic
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 6
  • [46] Impact of concomitant aortic regurgitation on long-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis
    Catovic, Suad
    Popovic, Zoran B.
    Tasic, Nebojsa
    Nezic, Dusko
    Milojevic, Predrag
    Djukanovic, Bosko
    Gradinac, Sinisa
    Angelkov, Lazar
    Otasevic, Petar
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 6
  • [47] Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Polimeni, Alberto
    Sorrentino, Sabato
    De Rosa, Salvatore
    Spaccarotella, Carmen
    Mongiardo, Annalisa
    Sabatino, Jolanda
    Indolfi, Ciro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [48] Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk, Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Oh, Jin Kyung
    Park, Sung-Ji
    Kim, Ho Jin
    Ahn, Jung-Min
    Kim, Dae-Hee
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    Park, Pyo Won
    Kang, Duk-Hyun
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 1514 - 1515
  • [49] The cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis
    Tam, Derrick Y.
    Azizi, Paymon M.
    Fremes, Stephen E.
    Chikwe, Joanna
    Gaudino, Mario
    Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2021, 7 (06) : 556 - 563
  • [50] Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Young, Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Yerasi, Charan
    Rogers, Toby
    Forrestal, Brian J.
    Case, Brian C.
    Khan, Jaffar M.
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Cohen, Jeffrey E.
    Kitahara, Hiroto
    Shults, Christian
    Waksman, Ron
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (11) : 1169 - 1180