Long-term survival after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement for low or intermediate surgical risk aortic stenosis: Comparison with general population

被引:6
|
作者
Maeda, Shusaku [1 ]
Toda, Koichi [1 ]
Shimamura, Kazuo [1 ]
Yoshioka, Daisuke [1 ]
Maeda, Koichi [1 ]
Yamada, Yu [1 ]
Igeta, Masataka [2 ]
Sakata, Yasushi
Sawa, Yoshiki [1 ,3 ]
Miyagawa, Shigeru [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Hyogo Coll Med, Dept Biostat, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation; Choice of intervention; Long-term outcome; Real-world population; DURABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.08.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Long-term survival after surgery for severe aortic stenosis (AS) provides important information regarding the choice between surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter (TAVR) aortic valve replacement. This study investigated the long-term survival of AS patients with low or intermediate surgical risk who underwent SAVR or TAVR in our institution versus that of the Japanese general population. Methods: From 2009 to 2019, 1276 consecutive patients underwent SAVR or TAVR for severe AS. Among them, we retrospectively investigated those with low (n = 383) or intermediate (n = 137) surgical risk treated with SAVR and those with low (n = 86) or intermediate (n = 333) surgical risk treated with TAVR. Their post-intervention survival was compared with that of an age-and gender-matched Japanese general population. Results: The overall 5-year survival rate of SAVR for patients with low surgical risk (mean age, 72 +/- 9 years) was not significantly different from that of the general population (90 % vs. 89%, respectively; p = 0.58), whereas that of patients with intermediate surgical risk (77 +/- 6 years) was significantly lower than that of the general popu-lation (77 % vs. 84 %, respectively; p = 0.03). After TAVR, the 5-year survival of patients with low (78 +/- 8 years) or intermediate (83 +/- 5 years) surgical risk was significantly lower than that of the general population (low risk, 64 % vs. 81 %, p < 0.01; intermediate risk, 66 % vs. 71 %, respectively, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that long-term survival after SAVR for AS patients with low surgical risk was as good as that of the age-and gender-matched general population, while the long-term survival after SAVR for intermediate-risk or TAVR for low-or intermediate-risk patients was lower than that of the general population. These findings suggest that SAVR is an appropriate option for AS patients with low surgical risk and good life expectancy, especially in Japan, where the life expectancy is the longest worldwide. (c) 2022 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 75
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT VERSUS SURGICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN A LOW TO INTERMEDIATE RISK POPULATION
    Macon, Conrad
    Singh, Vikas
    O'Neill, Brian
    Kattan, Cesia Gallegos
    Tanawuttiwat, Tanyanan
    Lucero, Thomas
    Carrillo, Roger
    Williams, Donald B.
    O'Neill, William
    Heldman, Alan
    Martinez, Claudia
    Alfonso, Carlos
    Cohen, Mauricio
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A1976 - A1976
  • [2] Comparison of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic stenosis at low-intermediate risk
    Khan, Mahin R.
    Kayani, Waleed T.
    Manan, Malalai
    Munir, Aland
    Hamazeh, Ihab
    Virani, Salim S.
    Birnbaum, Yochai
    Jneid, Hani
    Alam, Mahboob
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2020, 10 (02) : 135 - +
  • [3] Matched comparison of surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in intermediate to low risk aortic stenosis patients
    Castrodeza, J.
    Amat Santos, J.
    Blanco, M.
    Lopez, J.
    Di Stefano, A.
    Tobar, J.
    Cortes, C.
    Revilla, A.
    Gomez, I.
    San Roman, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 1050 - 1051
  • [4] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Low Surgical Risk
    Sondergaard, Lars
    Costa, Giulia
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (12) : 1541 - 1542
  • [5] Comparison of long-term outcomes and risk factors of aortic stenosis treatment in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement
    Marzec, Karolina
    Jaworska-Wilczynska, Maria
    Kowalik, Ilona
    Nieznanska, Malgorzata
    Witkowski, Adam
    Dabrowski, Maciej
    Kusmierski, Krzysztof
    Hryniewiecki, Tomasz
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2022, 80 (7-8) : 792 - 798
  • [6] Long-term outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low risk, elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis
    Kang, D-H.
    Oh, J. K.
    Lee, S-A.
    Lee, S.
    Kim, D-H.
    Park, D-W.
    Song, J-M.
    Choi, K-J.
    Song, J-K.
    Zo, J-H.
    Park, S-J.
    Park, S-J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 1145 - 1145
  • [7] Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low Operative Risk
    Virtanen, Marko P. O.
    Eskola, Markku
    Jalava, Maina P.
    Husso, Annastiina
    Laakso, Teemu
    Niemela, Matti
    Ahvenvaara, Tuomas
    Tauriainen, Tuomas
    Maaranen, Pasi
    Kinnunen, Eeva-Maija
    Dahlbacka, Sebastian
    Jaakkola, Jussi
    Vasankari, Tuija
    Airaksinen, Juhani
    Anttila, Vesa
    Rosato, Stefano
    D'Errigo, Paola
    Savontaus, Mikko
    Juvonen, Tatu
    Laine, Mika
    Makikallio, Timo
    Valtola, Antti
    Raivio, Peter
    Biancari, Fausto
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (06) : e195742
  • [8] Comparison of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Hahn, Rebecca T.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Stewart, William J.
    Weissman, Neil J.
    Gopalakrishnan, Deepika
    Keane, Martin G.
    Anwaruddin, Saif
    Wang, Zuyue
    Bilsker, Martin
    Lindman, Brian R.
    Herrmann, Howard C.
    Kodali, Susheel K.
    Makkar, Raj
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    Akin, Jodi J.
    Anderson, William N.
    Leon, Martin B.
    Douglas, Pamela S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (25) : 2514 - 2521
  • [9] Long-Term Outcome of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis
    Putra, Hendy Bhaskara Perdana
    Juslim, Richardus Rukma
    Jovie, Benny
    Pintaningrum, Yusra
    Rahadisiwi, Sekar
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (15) : S14 - S14
  • [10] Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk
    Kolkailah, Ahmed A.
    Doukky, Rami
    Pelletier, Marc P.
    Volgman, Annabelle S.
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    Nabhan, Ashraf F.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (12):