How do private and publicly-traded R&D service firms differ in their innovation performance and strategy? Evidence from the United Kingdom

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiuqin [1 ]
Deng, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Inst Innovat Res, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M13 9PL, England
关键词
TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; PROCESS MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MARKET; TRUNCATION; EFFICIENCY; PATENTS; SEARCH; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/radm.12698
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
R&D service firms (RDSFs) are increasingly recognized as a hidden engine of the UK economy and crucial drivers within the UK's innovation ecosystem, evolving from mere contractors and intermediaries to genuine innovators. Understanding the drivers of their innovation and growth is crucial for catalyzing economic advancement in the UK. Despite their acknowledged importance, research on RDSFs remains nascent, often relying on interviews and case studies without large-scale empirical analysis. This study addresses this gap by comparing the innovation outcomes of private versus publicly-traded RDSFs, reflecting their distinct financial and strategic environments, which influence their innovation trajectories. Using patent and scientific publication data from 2003 to 2019, we provide a robust analysis of the differences in innovation performance, efficiency, and strategic focus between these two categories of RDSFs. Our findings indicate that private RDSFs outperform in patent and publication outputs, exert greater influence on subsequent innovation, and demonstrate superior efficiency and exploration in their innovation process. This study offers critical insights for policymakers and industry leaders to formulate strategies that enhance the innovation impact of RDSFs within the broader UK innovation system.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 281
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How do university IPRs and R&D funding mechanisms affect innovation performance in the healthcare biotechnology industry? Evidence from Europe and the USA
    Gerbin, Ani
    Drnovsek, Mateja
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2013, 115 (01) : 79 - 95
  • [42] Do subsidies and R&D investment boost energy transition performance? Evidence from Chinese renewable energy firms
    Qi, Xiaoyan
    Guo, Yanshan
    Guo, Pibin
    Yao, Xilong
    Liu, Xiuli
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 164
  • [43] Productivity, financial performance, and corporate governance: evidence from Romanian R&D firms
    Albulescu, Claudiu Tiberiu
    Turcu, Camelia
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (51) : 5956 - 5975
  • [44] R&D spillovers and firms' performance in Italy - Evidence from a flexible production function
    Aiello, Francesco
    Cardamone, Paola
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 34 (01) : 143 - 166
  • [45] Do Cash Windfalls Affect Wages? Evidence from R&D Grants to Small Firms
    Howell, Sabrina T.
    Brown, J. David
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2023, 36 (05): : 1889 - 1929
  • [46] Do government subsidies stimulate firms' R&D efforts? Empirical evidence from China
    Sun, Xiaohua
    Yu, Runqun
    Wang, Yun
    Colombage, Sisira R. N.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 2020, 28 (02) : 163 - 180
  • [47] Does Confucian culture influence corporate R&D investment? Evidence from Chinese private firms
    Yan, Youliang
    Xu, Xixiong
    Lai, Jieji
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 40
  • [48] Innovation activities, sources of innovation and R&D cooperation: evidence from firms in Hong Kong and Guangdong Province, China
    Sharif, Naubahar
    Baark, Erik
    Lau, Antonio K. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 59 (3-4) : 203 - 234
  • [49] Heterogeneous Partners, R&D cooperation and corporate innovation capability: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms
    Liu, Ming
    Shan, Yanfei
    Li, Yemei
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2023, 72
  • [50] The Impact of Interfirm Cooperative R&D on Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Publicly Listed Companies
    Lo, Kai Lisa
    Liu, Huizhu
    Xia, Fei
    Mi, Jackson Jinhong
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2023, 59 (02) : 391 - 403