Improving medication access within integrated treatment for individuals with co-occurring disorders in substance use treatment agencies

被引:7
|
作者
Ford II, James H. [1 ]
Kaur, Arveen [1 ]
Rao, Deepika [1 ]
Gilson, Aaron [1 ]
Bolt, Daniel M. [2 ]
Garneau, Helene Chokron [3 ]
Saldana, Lisa [4 ]
Mcgovern, Mark P. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, Social & Adm Sci Div, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Educ, Educ Psychol Div, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Behav Hlth Serv & Implementat Res, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Div Publ Hlth & Populat Sci,Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Oregon Social Learning Ctr, Eugene, OR USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Stanford, CA USA
来源
关键词
Implementation strategy; co-occurring disorders; access to medications; implementation fidelity; integrated care; substance abuse treatment; quality improvement; network for the improvement of addiction treatment; addiction medications; psychotropic medications; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS; MENTAL-HEALTH; PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS; TREATMENT INITIATION; ABUSE TREATMENT; DUAL DIAGNOSIS; SIGMA; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/26334895211033659
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The best approach to provide comprehensive care for individuals with co-occurring disorders (CODs) related to substance use and mental health is to address both disorders through an integrated treatment approach. However, only 25% of behavioral health agencies offer integrated care and <7% of individuals who need integrated treatment receive it. A project used a cluster-randomized waitlist control group design to evaluate the effectiveness of network for the improvement of addiction treatment (NIATx) implementation strategies to improve access to addiction and psychotropic medications. Methods This study represents a secondary analysis of data from the NIATx project. Forty-nine agencies were randomized to Cohort1 (active implementation group, receiving the NIATx strategy [n = 25]) or Cohort2 (waitlist control group [n = 24]). Data were collected at three time points (Baseline, Year1, and Year2). A two-level (patient within an agency) multinomial logistic regression model investigated the effects of implementation strategy condition on one of four medication outcomes: both medication types, only psychotropic medication, only addiction medication, or neither medication type. A per-protocol analysis included time, NIATx fidelity, and agency focus as predictors. Results The intent-to-treat analysis found a statistically significant change in access to addiction versus neither medication, but Cohort1 compared to Cohort2 at Year 1 showed no differences. Changes were associated with the experimental intervention and occurred in the transition from Year1 to Year2, where greater increases were seen for agencies in Cohort2 versus Cohort1. The per-protocol analysis showed increased access to both medications and addiction medications from pre- to post-intervention for agencies in both cohorts; however, differences in change between high- and low-implementation agencies were not significant. Conclusions Access to integrated services for people with CODs is a long-standing problem. NIATx implementation strategies had limited effectiveness in improving medication access for individuals with CODs. Implementation strategy adherence is associated with increased medication access. Plain language summary Individuals with co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders face significant challenges in receiving care. With only 25% of behavioral health organizations offering integrated substance use and mental health services, it is not surprising that only 7% of individuals with a co-occurring disorder (COD) receive integrated care. The use of implementation strategies including feedback reports, external coaching, and in-person learning can provide staff with the necessary skills to implement changes in their organization. In this study, staff in addiction treatment agencies provided comprehensive assessments and treatment plans that targeted patients' CODs, using proven implementation strategies. Results found that the application of these strategies increased patient access to addiction medications and their access to both addiction and psychotropic medications for their CODs. Higher implementation strategy adherence appears to be associated with improved access to addiction medications or both addiction and psychotropic medications but not psychotropic medications exclusively. Implementation researchers and addiction treatment agencies have evidence that implementation strategies can be utilized to improve access to medications as part of integrated treatment for individuals with CODs. However, additional research is needed to understand how adherence and fidelity to the implementation strategies are associated with more significant improvements. In addition, the results from this study raise questions as to whether efforts to improve access to psychotropic medications or addiction and psychotropic medications take longer to implement in addiction treatment agencies that do not typically provide integrated treatment for individuals with CODs.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Co-Occurring Substance Use and Personality Disorders: Current Thinking on Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
    Straussner, Shulamith
    Nemenzik, Jean
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE IN THE ADDICTIONS, 2007, 7 (1-2) : 5 - 23
  • [42] Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Co-Occurring Substance Use Disorders: Advances in Assessment and Treatment
    McCauley, Jenna L.
    Killeen, Therese
    Gros, Daniel F.
    Brady, Kathleen T.
    Back, Sudie E.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2012, 19 (03) : 283 - 304
  • [43] Treatment for co-occurring mental and substance use disorders in five state Medicaid programs
    Clark, Robin E.
    Samnaliev, Mihail
    McGovern, Mark P.
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2007, 58 (07) : 942 - 948
  • [44] Health Insurance and Treatment of Adolescents With Co-Occurring Major Depression and Substance Use Disorders
    DiCola, Laura A.
    Gaydos, Laura M.
    Druss, Benjamin G.
    Cummings, Janet R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 52 (09): : 953 - 960
  • [45] Perceived Treatment Needs Among Women With Co-occurring Substance Use Disorders and PTSD
    Resko, Stella M.
    Brown, Suzanne
    Mendoza, Natasha S.
    Crosby, Shantel
    Gonzalez-Prendes, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF DUAL DIAGNOSIS, 2016, 12 (3-4) : 271 - 281
  • [46] Young adults with co-occurring disorders: substance use disorder treatment response and outcomes
    Bergman, Brandon G.
    Greene, M. Claire
    Slaymaker, Valerie
    Hoeppner, Bettina B.
    Kelly, John F.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2014, 46 (04) : 420 - 428
  • [47] Available Treatment for Bipolar Disorder with Co-Occurring Substance and Alcohol Use Disorders: A Review
    Lavoie, Shannon
    Levy, Boaz
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REVIEWS, 2012, 8 (02) : 83 - 96
  • [48] Developing standards of care for individuals with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders
    Minkoff, K
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2001, 52 (05) : 597 - 599
  • [49] Treatment for Co-Occurring Stimulant and Opioid Use Disorders
    Howell, Benjamin A.
    Lin, Lewei
    Coughlin, Lara N.
    JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 81 (09) : 853 - 854
  • [50] Stimulant treatment profiles predicting co-occurring substance use disorders in individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Groenman, Annabeth P.
    Schweren, Lizanne J. S.
    Weeda, Wouter
    Luman, Marjolein
    Noordermeer, Siri D. S.
    Heslenfeld, Dirk J.
    Franke, Barbara
    Faraone, Stephen V.
    Rommelse, Nanda
    Hartman, Catharina A.
    Hoekstra, Pieter J.
    Buitelaar, Jan
    Oosterlaan, Jaap
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 28 (09) : 1213 - 1222