Efficacy and Safety of Lumbar Drainage before Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

被引:0
|
作者
Terakado, Toshitsugu [1 ,2 ]
Ito, Yoshiro [3 ]
Hirata, Koji [4 ]
Sato, Masayuki [3 ]
Takigawa, Tomoji [5 ]
Marushima, Aiki [3 ]
Hayakawa, Mikito [4 ]
Tsuruta, Wataro [6 ]
Kato, Noriyuki [7 ]
Nakai, Yasunobu [1 ]
Suzuki, Kensuke [5 ]
Matsumaru, Yuji [3 ,4 ]
Ishikawa, Eiichi [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsukuba Med Ctr Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Koyama Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Kashima, Ibaraki, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Dept Neurosurg, Tennodai 1 1 1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058575, Japan
[4] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Div Stroke Prevent & Treatment, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[5] Dokkyo Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
[6] Toranomon Gen Hosp, Dept Neuroendovasc Therapy, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Natl Hosp Org Mito Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Higashi, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
cerebrospinal fluid; drainage; subarachnoid hemorrhage; endovascular procedures; SHUNT-DEPENDENT HYDROCEPHALUS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID; COIL EMBOLIZATION; RISK; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0069
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Intraoperative rebleeding during endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with poor prognosis. Lumbar drainage is performed preoperatively to control intracranial pressure; however, it is associated with a risk of brain herniation or rebleeding because intracranial pressure may change rapidly. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of preoperative lumbar drainage. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 375 patients who underwent endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms at our institution between April 2013 and March 2018. The incidence of rebleeding and clinical outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative lumbar drainage. Results: Among the 375 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms, 324 (86.0%) and 51 (14.0%) patients did and did not undergo lumbar drainage, respectively. The incidence of rebleeding was 11/324 (3.4%) and 2/51 (3.9%) in lumbar drainage and nonlumbar drainage groups, respectively, with no statistical differences (p = 0.98). Of the rebleeding cases, 9/11 (81%) and 2/2 (100%) in lumbar drainage and nonlumbar drainage groups, respectively, were due to intraoperative bleeding, and 2/11 (19%) in the lumbar drainage group, the causes of the rebleeding were undetermined. The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm did not differ significantly between the groups (13.2% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.776), while the incidence of hydrocephalus (24.6% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.043) and meningitis (15.2% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.075) were slightly higher in the lumbar drainage group. Favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score <2) at discharge were less frequent in the lumbar drainage group (55.3% vs. 70.0%, P = 0.051). No significant differences were observed in the propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusion: Lumbar drainage before endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms is a safe procedure that does not increase the incidence of rebleeding.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and efficacy of a new prophylactic tirofiban protocol without oral intraoperative antiplatelet therapy for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Liang, Xiao-dong
    Wang, Zi-liang
    Li, Tian-xiao
    He, Ying-kun
    Bai, Wei-xing
    Wang, Yang-yang
    Zhou, Guo-yu
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2016, 8 (11) : 1148 - 1153
  • [32] Safety and efficacy of staged coiling followed by flow diverter in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Li, Yuanzhi
    Fan, Feng
    Chen, Zhen
    Ma, Yajing
    Zhang, Hang
    Liu, Chao
    Fu, Yu
    Guan, Sheng
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2025, 48 (01)
  • [33] Endovascular therapeutic strategies in ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Machi, Paolo
    Lobotesis, Kyriakos
    Vendrell, Jean Francoise
    Riquelme, Carlos
    Eker, Omer
    Costalat, Vincent
    Bonafe, Alain
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (10) : 1646 - 1652
  • [34] Endovascular coiling for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Avila, M.
    De la Maza, M.
    Ponce De Leon, A. Martinez
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 253 : 44 - 44
  • [35] Endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Our experience in a decade
    Ana Maria, Fernandez-Martinez
    Jose Daniel, Samper-Wamba
    Jorge, Valdivia-Ruiz
    Santiago, Rosati
    Oscar, Balboa-Arregui
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE NEUROCIENCIA, 2015, 16 (05): : 3 - 15
  • [36] Endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Our experience in a decade
    Ana Maria, Fernandez-Martinez
    Jose Daniel, Samper-Wamba
    Jorge, Valdivia-Ruiz
    Santiago, Rosati
    Oscar, Balboa-Arregui
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE NEUROCIENCIA, 2015, 16 (01): : 16 - 29
  • [37] Chronic hydrocephalus after neurosurgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Jartti, P.
    Karttunen, A.
    Isokangas, J. -M.
    Jartti, A.
    Koskelainen, T.
    Tervonen, O.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2008, 49 (06) : 680 - 686
  • [38] Anticoagulation and induced hypertension after endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Bernardini, GL
    Mayer, SA
    Kossoff, SB
    Hacein-Bey, L
    Solomon, RA
    Pile-Spellman, J
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (03) : 641 - 644
  • [39] Microsurgical versus endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in young patients
    Ding, Dale
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 115 (11) : 2400 - 2401
  • [40] Acute endovascular treatment by coil embolisation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms - Commentary
    Kitchen, N
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2001, 83 (04) : 257 - 257