Efficacy and Safety of Lumbar Drainage before Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

被引:0
|
作者
Terakado, Toshitsugu [1 ,2 ]
Ito, Yoshiro [3 ]
Hirata, Koji [4 ]
Sato, Masayuki [3 ]
Takigawa, Tomoji [5 ]
Marushima, Aiki [3 ]
Hayakawa, Mikito [4 ]
Tsuruta, Wataro [6 ]
Kato, Noriyuki [7 ]
Nakai, Yasunobu [1 ]
Suzuki, Kensuke [5 ]
Matsumaru, Yuji [3 ,4 ]
Ishikawa, Eiichi [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsukuba Med Ctr Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Koyama Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Kashima, Ibaraki, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Dept Neurosurg, Tennodai 1 1 1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058575, Japan
[4] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Div Stroke Prevent & Treatment, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[5] Dokkyo Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
[6] Toranomon Gen Hosp, Dept Neuroendovasc Therapy, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Natl Hosp Org Mito Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Higashi, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
cerebrospinal fluid; drainage; subarachnoid hemorrhage; endovascular procedures; SHUNT-DEPENDENT HYDROCEPHALUS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID; COIL EMBOLIZATION; RISK; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0069
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Intraoperative rebleeding during endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms is associated with poor prognosis. Lumbar drainage is performed preoperatively to control intracranial pressure; however, it is associated with a risk of brain herniation or rebleeding because intracranial pressure may change rapidly. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of preoperative lumbar drainage. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 375 patients who underwent endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms at our institution between April 2013 and March 2018. The incidence of rebleeding and clinical outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative lumbar drainage. Results: Among the 375 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms, 324 (86.0%) and 51 (14.0%) patients did and did not undergo lumbar drainage, respectively. The incidence of rebleeding was 11/324 (3.4%) and 2/51 (3.9%) in lumbar drainage and nonlumbar drainage groups, respectively, with no statistical differences (p = 0.98). Of the rebleeding cases, 9/11 (81%) and 2/2 (100%) in lumbar drainage and nonlumbar drainage groups, respectively, were due to intraoperative bleeding, and 2/11 (19%) in the lumbar drainage group, the causes of the rebleeding were undetermined. The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm did not differ significantly between the groups (13.2% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.776), while the incidence of hydrocephalus (24.6% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.043) and meningitis (15.2% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.075) were slightly higher in the lumbar drainage group. Favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score <2) at discharge were less frequent in the lumbar drainage group (55.3% vs. 70.0%, P = 0.051). No significant differences were observed in the propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusion: Lumbar drainage before endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms is a safe procedure that does not increase the incidence of rebleeding.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Hammer, Alexander
    Steiner, Anahi
    Kerry, Ghassan
    Ranaie, Gholamreza
    Yakubov, Eduard
    Lichtenstern, David
    Baer, Ingrid
    Hammer, Christian M.
    Kunze, Stefan
    Steiner, Hans-Herbert
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 98 : 780 - 789
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms
    Raymond, J
    Roy, D
    NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 41 (06) : 1235 - 1245
  • [3] Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Froehler, Michael T.
    CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2013, 13 (02)
  • [4] Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Michael T. Froehler
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2013, 13
  • [5] Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    J.-P. Pruvo
    Xavier Leclerc
    Gustavo Soto Ares
    Jean-Paul Lejeune
    Didier Leys
    Journal of Neurology, 1999, 246 : 244 - 249
  • [6] Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Harold P. Adams
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2004, 4 (1) : 9 - 12
  • [7] Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Pruvo, JP
    Leclerc, X
    Ares, GS
    Lejeune, JP
    Leys, D
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1999, 246 (04) : 244 - 249
  • [8] Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms - Comment
    Stiver, SI
    Ogilvy, CS
    NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 41 (06) : 1246 - 1246
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of ruptured tiny cerebral aneurysms compared with ruptured larger aneurysms
    Wang, Ji-Wei
    Li, Cong-Hui
    Tian, Yang-Yang
    Li, Xin-Yu
    Liu, Jian-Feng
    Li, Hui
    Gao, Bu-Lang
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (03) : 283 - 290
  • [10] Endovascular treatment of ruptured peripheral intracranial aneurysms
    Chen, Zhi
    Yang, Yunfeng
    Miao, Hongpin
    Chen, Jingyu
    Luo, Chunxia
    Feng, Hua
    Zhu, Gang
    NEUROSCIENCES, 2012, 17 (02) : 133 - 138