Impact of Early Direct Patient Notification on Follow-Up Completion for Nonurgent Actionable Incidental Radiologic Findings

被引:0
|
作者
Loftus, James Ryan [1 ]
Kadom, Nadja [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Baran, Timothy M. [1 ]
Hans, Kristen [1 ]
Waldman, David [1 ]
Wandtke, Ben [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Imaging Sci, 601 Elmwood Ave,POB 648, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Emory Healthcare, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Emory Healthcare, ACR Metr Comm, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Emory Healthcare, Radiol Qual, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Imaging Sci, Qual & Safety, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Radiology; Pennsylvania Act 112; imaging follow-up; recommendation tracking; actionable incidental fi ndings; PENNSYLVANIA ACT 112; RECORDS; MESSAGE; LOOP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2023.07.026
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether early direct patient notification in addition to an existing multistage recommendation -tracking system (Backstop) increases follow-up completion rates for actionable incidental findings (AIFs). Patient attitudes toward early notification were also assessed. Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial recruited patients with AIFs requiring follow-up being enrolled into the Backstop system. Patients were randomized into four groups: those receiving additional early direct notification in a mailed letter (group 1, similar to Pennsylvania Act 112), by phone (group 2), or in an electronic portal message (group 3) and a control group (group 4) without additional notifications added to the existing Backstop system. Differences in follow-up completion rates among these groups were determined using chi(2) tests. Patients were surveyed on binary yes/no and Likert-type scale questions, and descriptive statistics are reported. Results: Data from 2,548 randomized patients were analyzed for the study, including 593 patients notified by letter, 637 notified by phone, 701 notified by portal, and 617 control patients. Group 3 demonstrated the lowest rate of follow-up completion within 1 month of the follow-up due date at 36.4%, compared with 58.7% for group 1, 60.4% for group 2, and 53.2% for group 4 ( P < .0001 for all). Group 2 was the only group to have a signi fi cantly higher completion rate than group 4 ( P 1 / 4 .014). Patients responded positively regarding early noti fi cation and preferred electronic portal communication. Conclusions: Early direct notification had a mixed impact on follow-up completion rates on the basis of communication modality but was positively received by patients and may have health care bene fi ts when implemented within a recommendation -tracking system.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 566
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results - A physician survey
    Boohaker, EA
    Ward, RE
    Uman, JE
    McCarthy, BD
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (03) : 327 - 331
  • [22] Catching Those Who Fall Through the Cracks: Integrating a Follow-Up Process for Emergency Department Patients with Incidental Radiologic Findings
    Barrett, Tyler W.
    Garland, Nicholas M.
    Freeman, Clifford L.
    Klar, Katharine
    Dahlke, Jan
    Lancaster, Penny
    Prisco, Larry
    Chang, Sam S.
    Goff, Laura W.
    Russ, Stephan
    Jones, Ian D.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [23] Early Impact of Pennsylvania Act 112 on Follow-up of Abnormal Imaging Findings
    Mattay, Govind S.
    Mittl, Gregory S.
    Zafar, Hanna M.
    Cook, Tessa S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (12) : 1676 - 1683
  • [24] The impact of completion and follow-up endoleaks on survival, reintervention, and rupture
    Li, Chun
    de Guerre, Livia E. V. M.
    Dansey, Kirsten
    Lu, Jinny
    Patel, Priya B.
    Yao, Mengdi
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    Jones, Douglas W.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (06) : 1676 - 1684
  • [25] IMPROVING PATIENT FOLLOW-UP IN INCIDENTAL SCREENING THROUGH REFERRAL LETTERS
    VELEZ, R
    ANDERSON, L
    MCFALL, S
    MAGRUDERHABIB, K
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 145 (12) : 2184 - 2187
  • [26] Management Strategies to Promote Follow-Up Care for Incidental Findings: A Scoping Review
    Crable, Erika L.
    Feeney, Timothy
    Harvey, Joshua
    Grim, Valerie
    Drainoni, Mari-Lynn
    Walkey, Allan J.
    Steiling, Katrina
    Drake, Frederick Thurston
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (04) : 566 - 579
  • [27] Impact of practice recommendations on patient follow-up
    Decullier, E.
    Touzet, S.
    Bourdy, S.
    Termoz, A.
    Bellon, G.
    Pin, I.
    Cracowski, C.
    Colin, C.
    Durieu, I.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2007, : 405 - 405
  • [28] Prevalence and Follow-Up of Incidental Findings in Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Examinations
    Valenzuela, J.
    Stilson, B.
    Amini, R.
    Patanwala, A.
    Adhikari, S.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 74 (04) : S148 - S148
  • [29] PATIENT NOTIFICATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF ABNORMAL TEST-RESULTS - A PHYSICIAN SURVEY
    BOOHAKER, EA
    WARD, RE
    UMAN, JE
    MCCARTHY, BD
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 41 (03): : A712 - A712
  • [30] Physicians' perceptions of breast density notification laws and appropriate patient follow-up
    Manning, Mark
    O'Neill, Suzanne
    Purrington, Kristen
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (07): : 586 - 594