Systematic Review of Instruments for the Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Childhood Glaucoma

被引:0
|
作者
Stingl, Julia V. [1 ]
Ortolano, Lorena Cascant [2 ]
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto [3 ]
Hoffmann, Esther M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Ophthalmol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr Johannes Gutenberg, Dept Lib, Mainz, Germany
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, North Ireland
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA | 2024年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
Childhood glaucoma; Congenital glaucoma; Patient-reported outcome measures; Quality of life; Systematic review; CONGENITAL GLAUCOMA; FUNCTIONAL VISION; CHILDREN; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; SATISFACTION; ADOLESCENTS; RELIABILITY; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ogla.2024.02.009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Topic: To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been used in children and adolescents with glaucoma and to evaluate their methodologic quality. Clinical relevance: Childhood glaucoma impairs vision and quality of life (QoL) throughout all stages of life. Thus, a PROM needs to cover many different age groups and topics. Various instruments have been used to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with childhood glaucoma, however, it is unclear which PROM has the highest methodologic quality and complies best with the needs of patients with childhood glaucoma. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed searching MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (EBSCO). We included peer-reviewed full-text articles of the past 10 years in English, German, or Spanish language that reported PROMs in children with glaucoma. The study selection and methodologic quality assessment of the identified PROMs was performed by 2 independent reviewers using a 7-point checklist. The content was mapped onto the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42022353936). Results: The search strategy retrieved 3295 matches. A total of 2901 studies were screened, and 11 relevant articles were identified using 10 different instruments. The instruments addressed functional visual ability, vision- related QoL, health-related QoL, and life satisfaction. Six instruments were applicable for the use in children. Seven of the questionnaires received the highest number of positive ratings (5/7). None of the instruments considered the views of patients with childhood glaucoma during their development. Conclusion: This systematic review provides a descriptive catalog of vision-specific and generic health PRO instruments that have been used in childhood glaucoma cohorts. An instrument specifically developed for childhood glaucoma is lacking which might result in missing important factors, such as permanent treatment with eye drops, repeated surgeries, and heritability of the disease, when investigating the QoL in children with glaucoma. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. Ophthalmology Glaucoma 2024;7:391-400 (c) 2024 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 400
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes in Celiac Disease (Ced): a Systematic Literature Review
    Langley, Paul C.
    Keith, Michael S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A640 - A640
  • [22] Effect of onychomycosis and treatment on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes: A systematic review
    Stewart, Claire R.
    Algu, Leah
    Kamran, Rakhshan
    Leveille, Cameron F.
    Abid, Khizar
    Rae, Charlene
    Lipner, Shari R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 85 (05) : 1227 - 1239
  • [23] Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review
    Verma, Vivek
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Mishra, Mark V.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2018, 110 (04): : 341 - 353
  • [24] Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
    Church, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (03) : 157 - 158
  • [25] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in retinal diseases: a systematic review
    Senthil, Mallika Prem
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 62 (04) : 546 - 582
  • [26] Health-related quality of life instruments and other patient-reported outcomes
    Valderasa, Jose Maria
    Ferrer, Montse
    Alonso, Jordi
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2005, 125 : 56 - 60
  • [27] Quality of reporting and assessment of patient-reported health-related quality of life in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review
    DiRisio, Aislyn C.
    Harary, Maya
    van Westrhenen, Anouk
    Nassr, Eman
    Ermakova, Anastasia
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Dirven, Linda
    Taphoorn, Martin J. B.
    Mekary, Rania A.
    Broekman, Marike L. D.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 5 (04) : 214 - 222
  • [28] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN GLAUCOMA
    Aggarwal, S.
    Segal, J.
    Topaloglu, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A509 - A509
  • [29] PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN GLAUCOMA A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Aggarwal, S.
    Segal, J.
    Messenger, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A178 - A178
  • [30] PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN GLAUCOMA A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Aggarwal, S.
    Topaloglu, H.
    Kumar, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A184 - A184