Systematic Review of Instruments for the Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Childhood Glaucoma

被引:0
|
作者
Stingl, Julia V. [1 ]
Ortolano, Lorena Cascant [2 ]
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto [3 ]
Hoffmann, Esther M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Ophthalmol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr Johannes Gutenberg, Dept Lib, Mainz, Germany
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, North Ireland
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA | 2024年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
Childhood glaucoma; Congenital glaucoma; Patient-reported outcome measures; Quality of life; Systematic review; CONGENITAL GLAUCOMA; FUNCTIONAL VISION; CHILDREN; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; SATISFACTION; ADOLESCENTS; RELIABILITY; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ogla.2024.02.009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Topic: To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that have been used in children and adolescents with glaucoma and to evaluate their methodologic quality. Clinical relevance: Childhood glaucoma impairs vision and quality of life (QoL) throughout all stages of life. Thus, a PROM needs to cover many different age groups and topics. Various instruments have been used to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with childhood glaucoma, however, it is unclear which PROM has the highest methodologic quality and complies best with the needs of patients with childhood glaucoma. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed searching MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (EBSCO). We included peer-reviewed full-text articles of the past 10 years in English, German, or Spanish language that reported PROMs in children with glaucoma. The study selection and methodologic quality assessment of the identified PROMs was performed by 2 independent reviewers using a 7-point checklist. The content was mapped onto the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42022353936). Results: The search strategy retrieved 3295 matches. A total of 2901 studies were screened, and 11 relevant articles were identified using 10 different instruments. The instruments addressed functional visual ability, vision- related QoL, health-related QoL, and life satisfaction. Six instruments were applicable for the use in children. Seven of the questionnaires received the highest number of positive ratings (5/7). None of the instruments considered the views of patients with childhood glaucoma during their development. Conclusion: This systematic review provides a descriptive catalog of vision-specific and generic health PRO instruments that have been used in childhood glaucoma cohorts. An instrument specifically developed for childhood glaucoma is lacking which might result in missing important factors, such as permanent treatment with eye drops, repeated surgeries, and heritability of the disease, when investigating the QoL in children with glaucoma. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. Ophthalmology Glaucoma 2024;7:391-400 (c) 2024 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 400
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported Outcomes for Assessment of Quality of Life in Refractive Error: A Systematic Review
    Kandel, Himal
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Goggin, Michael
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2017, 94 (12) : 1102 - 1119
  • [2] Quality of life among breast cancer patients with lymphedema: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments and outcomes
    Andrea L. Pusic
    Yeliz Cemal
    Claudia Albornoz
    Anne Klassen
    Stefan Cano
    Isabel Sulimanoff
    Marisol Hernandez
    Marga Massey
    Peter Cordeiro
    Monica Morrow
    Babak Mehrara
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2013, 7 : 83 - 92
  • [3] Quality of life among breast cancer patients with lymphedema: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments and outcomes
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Cemal, Yeliz
    Albornoz, Claudia
    Klassen, Anne
    Cano, Stefan
    Sulimanoff, Isabel
    Hernandez, Marisol
    Massey, Marga
    Cordeiro, Peter
    Morrow, Monica
    Mehrara, Babak
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2013, 7 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [4] Assessing quality of life of patients with hypospadias: A systematic review of validated patient-reported outcome instruments
    Sullivan, K. J.
    Hunter, Z.
    Andrioli, V.
    Guerra, L.
    Leonard, M.
    Klassen, A.
    Keays, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2017, 13 (01) : 19 - 27
  • [5] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma - instruments and methods: a systematic review
    Ritschel, Michaela
    Kuske, Silke
    Gnass, Irmela
    Andrich, Silke
    Moschinski, Kai
    Borgmann, Sandra Olivia
    Herrmann-Frank, Annegret
    Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
    Wittgens, Charlotte
    Flohe, Sascha
    Sturm, Johannes
    Windolf, Joachim
    Icks, Andrea
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [6] Eczema Trials: Quality of Life Instruments Used and Their Relation to Patient-Reported Outcomes. A Systematic Review
    Heinl, Daniel
    Chalmers, Joanne
    Nankervis, Helen
    Apfelbacher, Christian J.
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2016, 96 (05) : 596 - +
  • [7] Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and Reconstructive breast surgery: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments
    Moskovitz, Martin Jeffery
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 120 (04) : 838 - 839
  • [8] Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments
    Hamzah, Jemaima Che
    Burr, Jennifer M.
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
    Prior, Maria
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (07) : 1141 - 1158
  • [9] Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments
    Jemaima Che Hamzah
    Jennifer M. Burr
    Craig R. Ramsay
    Augusto Azuara-Blanco
    Maria Prior
    Quality of Life Research, 2011, 20 : 1141 - 1158
  • [10] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Quality of Life Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Kotecha, Dipak
    Ahmed, Amar
    Calvert, Melanie
    Lencioni, Mauro
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):