Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Matched-Cohort Study

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the predominant regimen in outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but induction often is unsuccessful, unobtainable, or against patient preference. We compared outcomes of same -day discharge (SDD) TJA with spinal versus general anesthesia in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Methods: We took 105 general anesthesia TJA and one-to-one nearest -neighbor matched them to 105 spinal anesthesia TJA over 7 years at 1 ASC. The rate of successful SDD, minutes to discharge, postoperative pain and nausea, and 90 -day complications were compared. Postanesthesia care unit outcomes were additionally strati fied by spinal anesthetic (mepivacaine versus bupivacaine). Results: All spinal anesthetic patients underwent SDD compared with 103 (98%) general anesthetic patients ( P = .498). Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia patients spent the fewest minutes in postanesthesia care unit prior to discharge from the facility (206), followed by general anesthesia (227), and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (291; P < .001). General anesthesia patients had the highest levels of pain at 1 hour (5.2 versus 1.5 versus 1.5) and 2 hours (3.2 versus 2.0 versus 1.3) postoperatively, and rates of nausea (48 versus 22 versus 28%) compared with mepivacaine and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, respectively. The 90 -day complications (6 versus 7), admissions (1 versus 3), and reoperations (5 versus 2) were similar among spinal and general anesthesia, respectively ( P >= .445). Conclusions: Both spinal and general anesthesia led to reliable SDD with similar 90 -day complication rates. General anesthesia facilitated faster discharge from the ASC compared with bupivacaine spinal anesthesia but led to higher levels of pain and incidence of nausea postoperatively. Level of Evidence: Level 3, Retrospective Cohort Comparison. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.