A multi-level and multi-actor approach to risk governance: a conceptual framework to support policy development for Ambrosia weed control

被引:8
|
作者
Lansink, Alfons Oude [1 ]
Schut, Marc [2 ,3 ]
Kamanda, Josey [4 ]
Klerkx, Laurens [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Business Econ Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Knowledge Technol & Innovat Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] IITA, Kigali, Rwanda
[4] Africa Rice Ctr AfricaRice, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
关键词
Common Ragweed; innovation; multi-scale; participatory policy development; public-private partnerships; AGRICULTURAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS; RAAIS RAPID APPRAISAL; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; INTEGRATED ANALYSIS; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; PLANT-DISEASE; MANAGEMENT; BIOSECURITY; INVASION; ARTEMISIIFOLIA;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2016.1247376
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Invasive species such as Ambrosia (an annual weed) pose a biosecurity risk whose management depends on the knowledge, attitudes and practices of many stakeholders. It can therefore be considered a complex policy and risk governance problem. Complex policy problems are characterised by high uncertainty, multiple dimensions, interactions across different spatial and policy levels, and the involvement of a multitude of actors and organisations. This paper provides a conceptual framework for analysing the multi-level and multi-actor dimensions of Ambrosia management. Potential and existing public, private and public-private management strategies are identified to address the interests and needs of different actor groups across different levels. We conclude that policies that promote a mix of public and private Ambrosia management strategies may respond better to the needs and interests of different actor groups across different levels than a one-size-fits-all approach. However, multiple policy strategies need to be aligned in order to lead to synergies and spreading coherent messages to the public. Collaboration may enhance the likelihood of biosecurity management and risk governance of Ambrosia being adequately implemented and enforced.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 799
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-level Policy Approach in the Governance of Labour Migration: Considerations From the Philippine Experience
    Battistella, Graziano
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (04) : 419 - 446
  • [42] Allocating responsibilities in multi-level governance for sustainable development
    Karlsson, Sylvia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 34 (1-2) : 103 - 126
  • [43] MULTI-LEVEL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE: A EUROPEAN TYPOLOGY
    Cotella, Giancarlo
    Rivolin, Umberto Janin
    Pede, Elena
    Pioletti, Maurizio
    EUROPEAN SPATIAL RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2021, 28 (01) : 201 - 221
  • [44] Regional policy and organizational fields in multi-level sport governance
    Rich, Kyle A.
    Nelson, Grace
    Borgen-Flood, Tammy
    Pegoraro, Ann
    EUROPEAN SPORT MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY, 2024, 24 (01) : 51 - 71
  • [45] Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks
    Di Gregorio, Monica
    Fatorelli, Leandra
    Paavola, Jouni
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Pramova, Emilia
    Nurrochmat, Dodik Ridho
    May, Peter H.
    Brockhaus, Maria
    Sari, Intan Maya
    Kusumadewi, Sonya Dyah
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2019, 54 : 64 - 77
  • [46] Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multi-level governance
    Rees, N
    JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 1998, 36 (01): : 133 - 134
  • [47] The European automobile industry: Multi-level governance, policy and politics
    Wells, P
    JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2000, 38 (02): : 360 - 361
  • [48] Health policy and federalism: A comparative perspective on multi-level governance
    Uzych, L
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2003, 94 (04): : 316 - 316
  • [49] Multi-level Governance in Competition Policy: the European Competition Network
    Cengiz, Firat
    EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW, 2010, 35 (05) : 660 - 677
  • [50] Cohesion Policy and Multi-level Governance in South East Europe
    Pan, Jing
    POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2012, 10 (02) : 287 - 288