MRI-guided dynamic risk assessment in cervical cancer based on tumor hypoxia at diagnosis and volume response at brachytherapy

被引:2
|
作者
Skipar, Kjersti [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hompland, Tord [1 ]
Lund, Kjersti V. [3 ]
Lindemann, Kristina [3 ,4 ]
Hellebust, Taran P. [5 ]
Bruheim, Kjersti [6 ]
Lyng, Heidi [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Biol, Oslo, Norway
[2] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Oncol, Skien, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[4] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[7] Univ Oslo, Dept Phys, Oslo, Norway
[8] Oslo Univ Hosp, Norwegian Radium Hosp, Inst Canc Res, Dept Radiat Biol, Ullernchausseen 70, N-0379 Oslo, Norway
关键词
CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY; WORKING GROUP; RADIOTHERAPY; IMMUNOTHERAPY; REGRESSION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110263
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Improvements in treatment outcome for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) require a better classification of patients according to their risk of recurrence. We investigated whether an imaging -based approach, combining pretreatment hypoxia and tumor response during therapy, could improve risk classification. Material and methods: Ninety-three LACC patients with T2-weigthed (T2W)-, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)- and diffusion weighted (DW)-magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired before treatment, and T2W- and, for 64 patients, DW-MR images, acquired at brachytherapy, were collected. Pretreatment hypoxic fraction (HFpre) was determined from DCE- and DW-MR images using the consumption and supply -based hypoxia (CSH)-imaging method. Volume regression at brachytherapy was assessed from T2W-MR images and combined with HFpre. In 17 patients with adequate DW-MR images at brachytherapy, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), reflecting tumor cell density, was calculated. Change in ADC during therapy was combined with volume regression yielding functional regression explorative response measure. Endpoint was disease free survival (DFS). Results: HFpre was the strongest predictor of DFS, but a significant correlation with outcome was found also for volume regression. The combination of HFpre and volume regression showed a stronger association with DFS than HFpre alone. Patients with disease recurrence were selected to either the intermediate- or high -risk group with a 100 % accuracy. Functional regression showed a stronger correlation to HFpre than volume regression. Conclusion: The combination of pretreatment hypoxia and volume regression at brachytherapy improved patient risk classification. Integration of ADC with volume regression showed promise as a new tumor response parameter.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dose planning variations related to delineation variations in MRI-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer
    Bell, Lauren
    Holloway, Lois
    Bruheim, Kjersti
    Petric, Primoz
    Kirisits, Christian
    Tanderup, Kari
    Poetter, Richard
    Vinod, Shalini
    Lim, Karen
    Pogson, Elise
    Metcalfe, Peter
    Hellebust, Taran Paulsen
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 19 (02) : 146 - 153
  • [22] Treatment outcomes of MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: institutional experiences
    Radovan Vojtíšek
    Petr Hošek
    Emília Sukovská
    Petra Kovářová
    Jan Baxa
    Jiří Ferda
    Jindřich Fínek
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2022, 198 : 783 - 791
  • [23] Treatment outcomes of MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: institutional experiences
    Vojtisek, Radovan
    Hosek, Petr
    Sukovska, Emilia
    Kovarova, Petra
    Baxa, Jan
    Ferda, Jiri
    Finek, Jindrich
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 198 (09) : 783 - 791
  • [24] Risk Group Analyses in Cervical Cancer Patients Based on Residual Tumor Volume and Tumor Reduction Ratio at the Time of Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy
    Nishikawa, R.
    Yoshida, K.
    Ebina, Y.
    Omoteda, M.
    Ejima, Y.
    Miyawaki, D.
    Ishihara, T.
    Takahashi, S.
    Sasaki, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E304 - E305
  • [25] INTRAOPERATIVE MRI-GUIDED BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER: AN INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE OF TREATMENT WORKFLOW, PLANNING AND PATIENT TOXICITY
    Leung, Eric
    D'Alimonte, Laura
    Barbera, Lisa
    Barnes, Elizabeth
    Taggar, Amandeep
    Donovan, Elysia
    Ravi, Ananth
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 150 : S43 - S43
  • [26] Neural network-assisted automated image registration for MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in cervical cancer
    Ecker, Stefan
    Zimmermann, Lukas
    Heilemann, Gerd
    Niatsetski, Yury
    Schmid, Maximilian
    Sturdza, Alina Emiliana
    Knoth, Johannes
    Kirisits, Christian
    Nesvacil, Nicole
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2022, 32 (04): : 488 - 499
  • [27] MRI-guided treatment of cervical cancer patients;: comparing brachytherapy with an IMRT-boost technique.
    Ketelaars, M
    van de Bunt, L
    de Kort, GAP
    Ceylan, C
    Jürgenliemk-Schulz, IM
    van der Heide, UA
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 75 : S12 - S12
  • [28] Treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a patient with a bicornuate uterus with MRI-guided intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy
    Fabian, Denise
    LaRocco, Allison
    Olsen, Meghan
    Quick, Allison
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (03) : 285 - 291
  • [29] Can Volume-Based MRI-Guided Planning for Interstitial Gynecologic Brachytherapy Overcome Clinicopathologic Risk Factors for Fistula Formation?
    Sivananthan, A. P.
    Hara, J.
    Lynch, C.
    Al-Hallaq, H. A.
    Wu, T.
    Son, C. H.
    Hasan, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E544 - E544
  • [30] Comparison of Two Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for MRI-Guided CT-Based Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
    Rong, Y.
    Dyer, B.
    Wright, C.
    Benedict, S.
    Mayadev, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3224 - 3224