Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication: A systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Emery, Shahzia Lambat [1 ,2 ]
Jeannot, Emilien [3 ]
Dallenbach, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Petignat, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Dubuisson, Jean [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat Gynaecol & Obstet, 30 Blvd Cluse, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, 30 Blvd Cluse, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Geneva, Inst Global Hlth, Fac Med, CH-1202 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Outpatient surgery; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Cost reduction; Public health; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ENHANCED RECOVERY; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102804
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Outpatient surgery in gynaecology may offer advantages including cost reduction, patient convenience and hospital bed optimisation without compromising patient safety and satisfaction. With the continual rise in health costs since 2000, outpatient surgery could be a line of action to improve financial resource utilisation and a solution for continuing to treat patients during crises such as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Objective: This systematic review provides an overview of the literature on minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for benign indications. Method: A focused systematic review of the medical literature between 2018 and 2022 on outpatient gynaecological surgery for a benign indication was conducted using the PubMed and Google Scholar search engines. We then narrowed our selection to articles that referred to hysterectomy. Successful same-day discharge (SDD) was defined as the patient's return home on the day of the procedure without an overnight stay. Results: Fifteen articles that focused on minimally invasive surgery were included in this review. Most of the studies (n = 11) were conducted in the United States. Outpatient surgery had a mean success rate of 60 % and a mean readmission rate of 3 %. The main reasons for SDD failure were patient choice, failed voiding, the need for pain management, nausea or vomiting, or both and the late timing of surgery. SDD was not associated with more complications and readmissions compared with inpatient care. The three main attribute predictors of SDD were young age, early timing of surgery and short total operative time. Patient satisfaction with SDD was high in absolute terms and relative to satisfaction with hospitalisation. Conclusion: Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication is feasible and safe but is associated with a notable risk of failure. To increase the success rate of outpatient management, patients must be well selected and surgery pathways must be planned in advance. The implementation of enhanced recovery protocols may help promote outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    Zantek, Paul
    Burtt, Glyn
    Martin, Chris
    Martin, Alison
    Springate, Cassandra
    Chughtai, Bilal
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (06) : 534 - 547
  • [42] Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Sajan, Abin
    Mehta, Tej
    Desai, Pratik
    Isaacson, Ari
    Bagla, Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (04) : 359 - +
  • [43] IMPLEMENTATION AND FEASIBILITY OF PROPHYLACTIC BILATERAL SALPINGECTOMY AT BENIGN, MINIMALLY INVASIVE HYSTERECTOMY IN STYRIA (AUSTRIA)
    Hutter, C.
    Tamussino, K.
    Simon, K.
    Kratky, M.
    Mutz-Eckhart, C.
    Blatt-Gunegger, M.
    Klammer, S.
    Bermann, C.
    Huber, A.
    Lessiak, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A232 - A232
  • [44] Effect of Perioperative Transfusion on Postoperative Morbidity Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Indications
    Tyan, Paul
    Taher, Ali
    Carey, Erin
    Amdur, Richard
    Messersmith, Cole
    Robinson, Hannah N.
    Gu, Alex
    Vargas, Maria V.
    Moawad, Gaby N.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 200 - 205
  • [45] Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy
    Chang, Erica J.
    Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
    Nusbaum, David J.
    Violette, Caroline J.
    Matsushima, Kazuhide
    Klar, Maximilian
    Matsuzaki, Shinya
    Machida, Hiroko
    Kanao, Hiroyuki
    Roman, Lynda D.
    Matsuo, Koji
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 1354 - 1362
  • [46] Predictors of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications
    AlAshqar, Abdelrahman
    Wildey, Brian
    Yazdy, Golsa
    Goktepe, Metin E.
    Kilic, Gokhan S.
    Borahay, Mostafa A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 158 (02) : 308 - 317
  • [47] Prediction models for same-day discharge following benign minimally invasive hysterectomy
    Hong, C. X.
    Kamdar, N.
    Morgan, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (03) : S1271 - S1272
  • [48] Gynecologic Surgical Subspecialty Training Decreases Surgical Complications in Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Pfeuti, Courtney Kay
    Makai, Gretchen
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 250 - 257
  • [49] Nationwide trends in and regional factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications in Japan
    Isoyama, Kyoko
    Matsuura, Motoki
    Hayasaka, Misa
    Nagao, Sachiko
    Nishimura, Yoko
    Yoshioka, Toshiki
    Imai, Yuichi
    Miyagi, Etsuko
    Suzuki, Yukio
    Saito, Tsuyoshi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 289 : 129 - 135
  • [50] Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review
    Banczerowski, Peter
    Czigleczki, Gabor
    Papp, Zoltan
    Veres, Robert
    Rappaport, Harry Zvi
    Vajda, Janos
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 38 (01) : 11 - 26